1 / 42

Future of Nuclear Power Lake Forest College March 28, 2008

Perspective: Generation Statistics. U.S. Total Generating Capacity 2006. Source: Global Energy Decisions / Energy Information AdministrationUpdated: 10/07. U.S. Electricity Generation Fuel Shares 2006. Source: Global Energy Decisions / Energy Information AdministrationUpdated: 10/07. Performance Statistics.

natara
Download Presentation

Future of Nuclear Power Lake Forest College March 28, 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. Future of Nuclear Power Lake Forest College March 28, 2008 Notes Notes

    2. Perspective: Generation Statistics

    5. Performance Statistics

    6. Sustained Reliability and Productivity

    10. Fuel Related Costs

    12. Nuclear Fuel Cost Not Directly Related to Uranium Spot Price

    13. Expanding Output of Existing Plants

    15. TVA’s Browns Ferry 1 back in service May 2007 (5-year, $1.8 billion project) TVA approved Watts Bar 2 completion August 2007 (5-year, $2.5 billion project) Notes Notes

    16. Safety

    17. U.S. Industrial Safety Accident Rate 2006

    19. Environmental View

    21. Emissions Avoided by the U.S. Nuclear Industry 1995 - 2006 Year Sulfur Dioxide (Million Short Tons) Nitrogen Oxides (Million Short Tons) Carbon Dioxide (Million Metric Tons) 1995 4.19 2.03 670.60 1996 4.16 1.89 645.30 1997 3.97 1.76 602.40 1998 4.08 1.76 646.40 1999 4.13 1.73 685.30 2000 3.60 1.54 677.20 2001 3.41 1.43 664.00 2002 3.38 1.39 694.80 2003 3.36 1.24 679.80 2004 3.43 1.12 696.60 2005 3.32 1.05 681.92 2006 3.12 0.99 681.18 Total 44.15 17.93 8,025.50 Source: Emissions avoided by nuclear power are calculated using regional fossil fuel emissions rates from the Environmental Protection Agency and plant generation data from the Energy Information Administration Updated: 4/07 Emissions Avoided by the U.S. Nuclear Industry 1995 - 2006 Year Sulfur Dioxide (Million Short Tons) Nitrogen Oxides (Million Short Tons) Carbon Dioxide (Million Metric Tons) 1995 4.19 2.03 670.60 1996 4.16 1.89 645.30 1997 3.97 1.76 602.40 1998 4.08 1.76 646.40 1999 4.13 1.73 685.30 2000 3.60 1.54 677.20 2001 3.41 1.43 664.00 2002 3.38 1.39 694.80 2003 3.36 1.24 679.80 2004 3.43 1.12 696.60 2005 3.32 1.05 681.92 2006 3.12 0.99 681.18 Total 44.15 17.93 8,025.50 Source: Emissions avoided by nuclear power are calculated using regional fossil fuel emissions rates from the Environmental Protection Agency and plant generation data from the Energy Information Administration Updated: 4/07

    22. Emissions Reductions in Perspective The UNFCCC estimates that the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) will generate 1.2 billion tonnes of emission reductions by the end of 2012 Worldwide, nuclear power avoids the emissions of around 2.6 billion tonnes of CO2 annually

    23. World Nuclear Generation 1973 – 2005, Billion kWh

    24. Comparison of Life-Cycle Emissions Tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent per Gigawatt-Hour

    30. Increasing Public Support

    31. Favorability to Nuclear Energy by Political Views Nuclear energy has strong support across the political spectrum.

    32. Growing Public Support For More Nuclear Energy

    33. Near Term Deployment

    34. U.S. Needs 25 Percent More Electricity by 2030 BkWh

    35. Capacity Brought Online by Fuel Type 1950-2007 (Nameplate Capacity, MW)

    37.

    38. New Nuclear Plants Under Consideration

    39. New Nuclear Plants Under Consideration

    40. State Policies Supporting Nuclear Construction

    41. Nuclear: Future Promise

    42. The NGNP Concept – HTGR Demonstration The Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) Demonstration Project is the basis for an entirely new generation of advanced nuclear plants that utilize high temperature gas cooled reactor (HTGR) technology.  This technology extends the application of nuclear energy beyond the generation of electricity to uses in the broader energy sector.  The HTGR reliability, safety, proliferation resistance, waste management and economy will be competitive with and, in some cases, exceed those achieved in existing commercial nuclear plants.  The NGNP Project will result in a full scale prototype that demonstrates the commercialization potential of the HTGR and associated technologies.  It will also help establish the commercial infrastructure.  These advanced nuclear plants can supply competitive, emission-free, high temperature process heat and/or hydrogen.  The hydrogen can be used as an energy carrier or in enhanced oil recovery, refineries, coal-to-liquids and coal-to-gas plants, chemical plants and fertilizer plants.  Accordingly, these advanced nuclear plants can promote the utilization of indigenous coal and uranium resources and extend domestic oil and gas resources thereby reducing dependence and costs associated with imported petroleum and natural gas.  Utilization of these high temperature HTGR heat sources can effectively improve the carbon efficiency of major petrochemical and bulk hydrogen-based complexes.  The Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) Demonstration Project is the basis for an entirely new generation of advanced nuclear plants that utilize high temperature gas cooled reactor (HTGR) technology.  This technology extends the application of nuclear energy beyond the generation of electricity to uses in the broader energy sector.  The HTGR reliability, safety, proliferation resistance, waste management and economy will be competitive with and, in some cases, exceed those achieved in existing commercial nuclear plants.  The NGNP Project will result in a full scale prototype that demonstrates the commercialization potential of the HTGR and associated technologies.  It will also help establish the commercial infrastructure.  These advanced nuclear plants can supply competitive, emission-free, high temperature process heat and/or hydrogen.  The hydrogen can be used as an energy carrier or in enhanced oil recovery, refineries, coal-to-liquids and coal-to-gas plants, chemical plants and fertilizer plants.  Accordingly, these advanced nuclear plants can promote the utilization of indigenous coal and uranium resources and extend domestic oil and gas resources thereby reducing dependence and costs associated with imported petroleum and natural gas.  Utilization of these high temperature HTGR heat sources can effectively improve the carbon efficiency of major petrochemical and bulk hydrogen-based complexes. 

    43. Final Thoughts Water use: a perspective Waste management and recycling Non proliferation Nuclear’s role in climate change challenge

More Related