1 / 29

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Military Construction and Civil Works Programs Update

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Military Construction and Civil Works Programs Update. Lloyd Caldwell, P.E., SES  Military Programs Integration Stephen R. Deloach, P.E., L.S. Deputy Chief, Engineering and Construction 23 June 2011. Agenda. Military Programs Civil Works

navid
Download Presentation

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Military Construction and Civil Works Programs Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Military Construction and Civil Works Programs Update Lloyd Caldwell, P.E., SES  Military Programs Integration Stephen R. Deloach, P.E., L.S. Deputy Chief, Engineering and Construction 23 June 2011

  2. Agenda • Military Programs • Civil Works • Engineering and Construction

  3. USACE Military Missions • Military Construction • Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) • Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) • Installation Support • Environmental • Energy and Sustainability • Interagency Support • International Services • Real Estate Services • COCOM Support • Research and Development • Geospatial Support Children's Hospital, Basara, Iraq Community Hospital, FT Belvoir, VA FORSCOM HQ, Fort Bragg, NC Border Fence, Imperial Sand Dunes, CA BRAC 133 Mark Center, Arlington, VA 3 National Geospatial Center, FT Belvoir, VA HAAN Bridge, FT Bliss, TX Kabul Road, Bagram, Afghanistan

  4. Military Missions Program TrendsFY00-15 Program ($Millions) AR,AF & DOD Reimbursable ARRA RE Other ECIP RDT&E Host Nation/FMS OCO Engineering & Design Environmental DOD Air Force Construction Army Construction Fiscal Year Current $ as of Mar 11 (FY12 PB) FY09-10 Includes Military Carryover – FY 00 -15 AR, AF and DOD Reimbursable is separate

  5. Near Term MILCON Overview FY 11: Department of Defense & Full-year Continuing Appropriations Act, Section 1119 Across the board rescission (0.2%) for FY11 Budget Authority and additional cuts to each Service Result: Projects’ program amount is reduced; and some projects are deleted from the FY11 program MILCON FY 10 & Prior Unawarded ($709M): Army – 67 projects / $165M (excludes on hold incl. OCO pending cancellation) Air Force – 26 projects / $14M DOD – 14 projects / $530M MILCON FY11 ($7.86B): Army – 257 projects / $4.36B Air Force – 61 projects / $1.0B DOD – 69 projects / $2.1B ECIP – 22 projects / $43M FY 12: $7.1B program for Army, AF, DOD and ECIP MILCON FY12 ($6.35B): Army – 129 projects / $3.4B Air Force – 43 projects / $1.2B DOD – 61 projects / $2.0B ECIP – 18 projects / $52M

  6. FY 11 Program FY 12 Program FY 13 Program FY 14 Program FY 09 Program FY 10 Program Budget Submit Budget Submit Budget Submit Budget Submit FY 15 Program OSD OSD OSD OSD OSD OSD OSD PB PB PB PB PB PB PB Design 1391 work 1391 work 1391 work 1391 work 1391 work 1391 work 1391 work Design Design Design Design Design Design Award, Construction, Turnover Award, Construction, Turnover Award, Construction, Turnover Award, Construction, Turnover Award, Construction, Turnover Award, Construction, Turnover Award, Construction, Turnover Army MILCON Programming Sequence We are here FY04FY05FY06FY07FY08FY09FY10FY11FY12FY13FY14FY15FY16FY17FY18 We are here

  7. Army MILCON Overview Facilities Investment in Army Priorities (MCA, MCAR, MCNG)

  8. Air Force • FY 12 Key projects: • Headquarters STRATCOM Replacement, Offutt AFB, NE, $564M • Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center Sustainment Center, Kirtland AFB, NM, $25M • Dormitories, eight, multiple locations, $254M • F-35 and F-22 Bed-Down Support Facilities (multiple locations)

  9. DoD Education Activity Building 21st Century Schools • DoDEA has a total of 194 schools and currently faced with the challenge of replacing or renovating over 130 schools worldwide for a total program budget of $4.5B over the next seven years. • FY 12 Key Projects: • Elementary School Ft. Benning, GA $37M • Middle School Hanscom AFB $34M • Elementary School Ft. Knox, KY $39M

  10. TRICARE Management Activity Meeting military mission requirements with world-class health care facilities • FY12 Key Projects: • Hospital Landstuhl, Germany $1.2B • Ambulatory Care Center Lackland, AFB – Phase III $161M • Hospital Alteration Ft. Stewart, GA – Phase II $72M • Hospital Alteration Ft. Campbell, KY $57M • Hospital Alteration Ft. Bragg NC $58M • Clinics (3) Eglan AFB & Ft. Drum, NY $32M

  11. FY12 Military Program - $23B ($M)

  12. FY12 MILCON Overview FY12 Budget Overview Document can be found at: http://comptroller.defense.gov/Budget2012.html Links to Budget Materials: US Army Budget Documentation, US Air Force Budget Documentation, and Defense Wide Budget Documentation http://asafm.army.mil/Documents/OfficeDocuments/Budget/BudgetMaterials/FY12/milcon/mca-afh-hoa.pdf http://comptroller.defense.gov/defbudget/fy2012/budget_justification/pdfs/07_Military_Construction/13-TRICARE_Management_Activity.pdf Divisions with the largest programs: North Atlantic – 54 projects South Atlantic – 40 projects Southwestern – 36 projects Lakes & Rivers – 35 projects 12

  13. Energy Army Strategic Direction, Targets and Implementing Guidance • Army Strategic Direction • Reduce total ownership cost through design and construction of operationally and energy efficient buildings. • Reduce future demand on renewable sources • Achieve NET ZERO Energy , Water and/or Waste across select Army Installations in one or more combinations • Energy Targets Established by Law • EPAct 2005, 30 percent better than ASHRAE 90.1 2004 • ESIA 2007, 65 percent fossil fuel reduction by 2015, Net Zero by 2030 • Implementing Guidance • FY10 and earlier - EPAct compliant • FY11-12 - 40 percent more efficient over ASHRAE 90.1 2007 • FY13 and beyond - Compliant with ASHRAE 189.1 as a minimum standard, achieve EISA 2007 targets when project funds allow

  14. Low Energy Solutions – Typical all facilities Improved roof insulation Entrance vestibule Triple-pane windows plus minimize thermal breaks • Other features include: • High efficiency water fixtures • Improved HVAC components • Variable pumps and fans Improved wall insulation – Insulated Concrete Form (ICF) Improved lighting design & control systems

  15. Low Energy Options – Typical Site Specific Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) Solar Hot Water – all packages Radiant heating and cooling mat in ceiling Radiant floor Transpired Solar Collector (TSC)

  16. USACE Civil Works: Value to Our Nation Recreation areas: 370 M Visitors/yr Generate $18B in economic activity, 500,000 jobs 12,000 miles of Commercial Inland Waterways transport goods at ½ the cost of rail or 1/10 the cost of trucks ¼ of Nation’s Hydropower: $800M + in power sales Maintenance of ~200 Shallow & Deep Draft Harbors Water-based Recreation 54,879 Miles Of Shoreline at USACE Lakes 692 Dams and 11,750 Miles of Levees: avg annual flood losses prevented = $25.5B over past 10 years Stewardship of 11.7 Million Acres Public Lands US Ports & Waterways Convey > 2.2 billion Tons Commerce Corps Maintained Ports Provide Strategic Deployment Capability HMTF collects $1.3 billion revenue 137 Major Environmental Restoration Projects

  17. Flood Risk Reduction For more information contact FULL NAME, Office Symbol

  18. USACE Civil Works ProgramFY12 Budget Request Lock and Dam 15 ( Mississippi River ) Dredge ESSAYONS ( Coos Bay, OR ) Flood Wall ( Williamson, KY ) Everglades Bonneville II Powerhouse ( Washington ) Deliver enduring, comprehensive, sustainable, and integrated solutions to the Nation’s water resources and related challenges through collaboration withour stakeholders (Regions, States, Localities, Tribes, Other Federal Agencies ) ($1.575 B) Navigation (34%) ($1.447 B) Flood Risk (31%) Management ($742 M) Ecosystem (16%) Restoration & Infrastructure ($182 M) Hydropower (4%) ($259 M) Recreation & Natural (6%) Resource Management ($196 M) Regulatory Program: (4%) Wetlands & Waterways ($34 M) Disaster Preparedness (0.7%) & Response ($6 M) Water Supply (0.1%) ($185 M) Expenses (3%) Lake Seminole ( Mobile District )

  19. Trends to Watch • National debt and controlled spending • Budgets and Appropriations of discretionary, non-defense related agencies are an early target • FY12 budget is a decrease of 15% below FY 10 appropriations; calls for frozen spending levels for 5 years • Largest CW accounts (Construction, Operation & Maintenance, Miss. R. & Tributaries) and business programs (Navigation, Flood Risk Management, Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration) are being and will be reduced

  20. CW Funding Through FY12 Budget FY11 Work Plan http://www.usace.army.mil/CEPA/NewsReleases/Pages/2012CWBudget.aspx

  21. FY 2012 CW Program by Account($ Millions) • http://www.usace.army.mil/CEPA/NewsReleases/Pages/2012CWBudget.aspx

  22. Navigation Major Construction Projects( $5 M or More in FY12 Budget ) Mt. St. Helens Sediment Control 7 128 Columbia R. Fish Mitigation Missouri R. Fish & Wildlife Recovery 73 Upper Mississippi River Restoration 18 65 NY / NJ Harbor Napa River Salt Marsh Restoration 26 American River Little Calumet River McCook & Thornton Reservoirs 12 Raritan & Sandy Hook Bays Lower Cape May 6 21 Folsom Dam Chicago Sanitary & Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier 14 9 10 Hamilton Airfields Hamilton City 8 10 Dover Dam 8 5 Bluestone Lake Sacramento River Bank Protection S. Sacramento County Streams 11 Poplar Island Chesapeake Bay Oyster Recovery 8 5 Olmsted Lock & Dam 5 70 150 132 Miss. R. betw. Ohio & Missouri R’s 27 Norfolk Hbr./ Craney Island 7 5 18 Success Dam Levisa & Tug Forks Clearwater Lake 33 Wolf Creek Dam 79 Santa Ana River Mainstem 21 Center Hill Dam Rio Grande Floodway 10 Canton Lake 11 24 Miss. R. Levees Savannah Hbr. 5 46 Miss. R. Channel Improvement Portugues and Bucana Rivers, PR 45 Atchafalaya Basin Jacksonville Hbr. 7 6 Rio Puerto Nuevo, PR 7 Lower Colorado River Basin 11 5 Larose to Golden Meadow Flood Risk Management Louisiana Coastal Area Ecosystem Restoration 85 Herbert Hoover Dike 5 Dade County 15 163 Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration S. Fla. Ecosystem Restoration Hydropower

  23. Use of Funds • Make optimal use of available funds • Fund fewer projects more efficiently • More sophisticated asset management • Risk-based maintenance funding • Proportionally more for maintenance, less for new or replacement projects • Eliminate categories of projects with least national benefits • Deliver less (flood control, navigation, recreation, hydropower, ….) • De-authorize constructed projects that no longer serve their authorized purposes • Educate better: Jobs, Infrastructure, Value to Nation

  24. Find Other Funds • Seek other sources of funds • Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund • Seek more of annual revenues for channel maintenance and related activities • Inland Waterways Trust Fund • Seek additional revenue and revenue sources • Direct funding of hydropower or public private partnership funding of some hydro

  25. Change the Debate • From projects – To systems/programs • Navigation: Coastal and Inland • Flood Risk Management: Coastal and Inland • Hydropower • Environment • From Prioritization of Projects -- To Prioritization of Systems • Congress: From ‘Earmarks’ to Categories of Projects

  26. Project Delivery Success with standard designs; Adapting for energy Model for energy, starting during the planning phase Lifecycle Cost Analysis, (LCCA) on building systems to understand total ownership cost - part of every design analysis Watch for Dam Safety Production Centers Building Levee Safety Program Technical skills – How can you help us Continue to watch schedule and focus on quality Be innovative and help us drive energy efficient solutions Continue to push new under utilized technologies Use the full potential of BIM for construction and our customer Engineering and ConstructionCurrent focus areas and a look to the future

  27. CW – Asset Management A persistent catalyst for holistically integrating and enhancing the sustainment, restoration, modernization and disposition of USACE water resources to continually serve the Nation. “Portfolio Based Decision Making” to evenly distribute risk and work in both time and space. Current, quality guidance and standards Stay engaged, look for us at conferences, give us feedback Feedback link: http://usace.army.mil/CECW/Pages/cecwe_index.aspx Engineering and ConstructionCurrent focus areas and a look to the future

  28. USACE won Sec Army/Chief of Staff Safety Award for FY 09 and 10 USACE civilian lost time injury rate reduced from 0.89 to 0.41 (accidents/100 man years) Contractor rate was 0.26 (lost workday cases/100 man year) USACE Safety Success

  29. Wrap Up • The Corps is ready to support the Nation’s needs at home and abroad • USACE programs are adjusting to meet the Nation’s needs • We must optimize available funding • The A/E and construction industries are key to the Corps success

More Related