1 / 12

Division of Student Affairs Prioritization and Recovery Progress Report

Division of Student Affairs Prioritization and Recovery Progress Report. Monday, October 31, 2005. Prioritization Process. To optimize use of resources within departments to accomplish mission. Some departments are well along in the process Others are just beginning.

nedaa
Download Presentation

Division of Student Affairs Prioritization and Recovery Progress Report

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Division of Student AffairsPrioritization and Recovery Progress Report Monday, October 31, 2005 DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS

  2. Prioritization Process • To optimize use of resources within departments to accomplish mission. • Some departments are well along in the process • Others are just beginning. • Our 05-06 goal is to move from prioritized lists of programs and services to implementation plans. DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS

  3. Student Affairs PrioritizationWhere We’ve Been May 2004 • Visit From Robert Dickeson, Author of “Prioritizing Academic Programs and Services” • University sets prioritization as a 2004-05 priority. • Student Affairs adopts the “spirit” of Dickeson’s strategies • For SA, prioritization within departments, but not between departments or clusters. DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS

  4. Student Affairs PrioritizationWhere We’ve Been June 2004 • TLG establishes prioritization criteria teams in three categories: • Cost Criteria • Demand Criteria • Quality/Outcomes Criteria DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS

  5. Student Affairs PrioritizationWhere We’ve Been August 2004 • TLG retreat: Finalize and distribute prioritization criteria • Reviewed a suggested scoring tool • Departments were to complete a review of their mission and develop a prioritized list of their programs and services. • Student Affairs Cabinet was to review inefficiencies created by our organizational structure. DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS

  6. Cost Criteria • Cost to provide program or service per user served • Potential for greater efficiency • Physical space needs to provide service. DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS

  7. Demand Criteria • Program or service is required • Program or service is supportive • Current unmet need for program or service • Anticipated increase in demand • External constituent support DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS

  8. Quality/Outcomes Criteria • Quality of Inputs • Quality of Outcomes DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS

  9. Summary of 2004-05 Prioritization Efforts • Most departments were able to conduct a prioritization process • Approximately half followed the formal process • The other half used the criteria for a more qualitative analysis of services • Divisional effort: SSEP consolidation from University Advising Center and Educational Equity Services. DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS

  10. Summary of 2005-06 Prioritization Efforts • At our Leadership Group Retreat on September 13, 2005 we reviewed our divisional priorities in light of the vision that the President shared at fall conference, which focused on insuring that Cal Poly Pomona is a learning-centered University, focused on student success. DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS

More Related