1 / 10

Essential Services at a Cross Road

Essential Services at a Cross Road. What are the Options? Anton Roskam. Designation Approach. Approaches to Essential Services. List Approach. List of essential services enumerated in legislation or by way of designation process Advantages: Certainty

neena
Download Presentation

Essential Services at a Cross Road

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Essential Services at a Cross Road What are the Options? Anton Roskam

  2. Designation Approach Approaches to Essential Services List Approach List of essential services enumerated in legislation or by way of designation process Advantages: Certainty Avoids ad hoc determinations in the heat of the moment Disadvantage Inability to distinguish between disputes that endanger essential services and those that do not Essential service defined with reference to potential consequences of industrial action as opposed to nature of work and identity of employer Advantage More flexible Disadvantage Less certain SA follows a designation approach with elements of the list approach

  3. ILO identifies 5 kinds of services • Essential services in the strict sense of the term • Services leading to an acute national crisis • Public services of fundamental importance • Other public services • Employees exercising authority in the name of the state • Ordinary services

  4. Key Problems • The definition of essential services • Interpretation of section 72(b) of the LRA • The conclusion of minimum services agreements (MSAs) • Parties lack capacity • No guidance from labour market institutions • No incentive to employer once designation made • Employers : ineffective sanctions for non-compliance • Dispute resolution regarding the conclusion of MSAs • Eskom Holdings (Pty) Ltd v NUM and others [2009] 1 BLLR 5 (LC) • NUM & another v Eskom Holdings (Pty) Ltd (2010) 31 ILJ 2570 (LAC) • Interest arbitrations • The powers and functions of the Essential Services Committee (ESC)

  5. Interpreting Section 72(b) of the LRA

  6. Key administrative problems • The way the ESC operates • Under-resourced • Part-time commissioners • No secretariat • Research and collection of factual data • Accountability • Composition of the ESC • Qualifications of persons and experience of public service • Debate about these issues – publishing awards

  7. Key Policy Issues • Incentive to conclude MSA • Min. Service too large • Interest arbitrations, if designation more than 50% • Code of Good Practice for MSAs • Effectiveness of interest arbitrators and facilitators of MSAs • Sanctions for non-compliance with essential designation or MSA • Who imposes? - ESC/CCMA/Labour Court/MSAs • Conflict between:

  8. Functions

  9. Options – Institutional Arrangements

More Related