180 likes | 291 Views
Moving Your Computer Lab(s) to the Cloud. Rick O’Toole & Dave Hicking University of Connecticut Libraries. Introductions / Background. Rick O'Toole , Public Computing Coordinator Dave Hicking , IT Support Coordinator
E N D
Moving Your Computer Lab(s) to the Cloud Rick O’Toole & Dave Hicking University of Connecticut Libraries
Introductions / Background • Rick O'Toole, Public Computing Coordinator • Dave Hicking, IT Support Coordinator • Members of the Libraries' ITS dept, staff of 8; support Library staff and technology in 9 buildings across 6 state-wide campuses • Dependent upon central IT for networking, authentication, other infrastructure services
UConn Libraries at-a-glance • Over 370 public machines • Windows desktops, Macs, laptops • Open computing cafes • “Labs” • Classrooms • Video theaters • Seminar rooms • Collaborative spaces • Lending laptops • Network printing – cost recovery • Black & White • Color
WHY go virtual? Benefits? For the Library: • Deploy software faster across machines • Reduce time/labor to perform desktop updates • Cost savings (equipment, staff, power) * For the Users: • Consistent user experience across labs • Access to software from anywhere, anytime • More up-to-date software available • *Results may vary
UConn Libraries case study • Success in virtualizing servers • Desire to find similar efficiencies with desktops • Partnership with the School of Business and School of Engineering • Common interests • Shared resources • Buying power • Complementary skills and experience
HOW to transition to virtual • Sell the concept, explain the benefits. Use other successful institutions as examples • Get buy-in/support from supervisor(s) or sponsor(s) • Secure funding, up-front and long-term • Stakeholder involvement • Build & train your team • Develop a support network, workflows, etc.
Necessary ingredients • A sensible plan, reasonable scope • Project Management • The right people, the right skills • A phased approach • Patience and flexibility • User involvement and feedback • The right equipment – re-purposing old equip vs. buying new devices • Tech Support • Marketing & Communication • $
Transitioning Steps • Pilot a small # of computers • Ericom browser-based access • Repurpose existing PCs as “thin desktop” model • VMware Whitepaper
OLD Equipment Lifecycle: • budget planning – equipment requests based on needs, outside requests • specification - working with Lib staff to meet user's needs • procurement - working with vendor(s) for best price and model • inventory control - working with material handling; imputing equip into own database • configuration & testing - creating image, applying settings • security - physical and software policies • implementation - space planning; coordinate resources; remove old equip, install equip; document for ongoing support • support - higher level troubleshooting that desk can't address • upgrade - periodic software updates, applying patches, adding new software • replacement - putting better or newer equip in when it becomes obsolete or unable to perform tasks
NEWEquipment Lifecycle: • budget planning – equipment requests based on needs, outside requests • specification - working with Lib staff to meet user's needsMoved to standard zero client device • procurement - working with vendor(s) for best price and model • inventory control - working with material handling; imputing equip into own databaseDevices not under $1000, do not require tagging • configuration & testing - creating image, applying settingsDevices don't have OS of software • security - physical and software policies • implementation - space planning; coordinate resources; remove old equip, install equip; document for ongoing support *Quicker • support - higher level troubleshooting that desk can't address *Quicker • upgrade - periodic software updates, applying patches, adding new softwareDone remotely, quicker via Teradici console • replacement - putting better or newer equip in when it becomes obsolete or unable to perform tasks
Why use zero clients? The benefits include: • Cost of device approxhalf that of desktop *once your back-end hardware is in place • No moving parts reduces support calls, can extend life of equipment, quieter • Energy savings • Smaller footprint saves desk space • Quicker startup
Printing • Initially we had approximately 20 separate printers installed in each virtual machine • Doesn’t scale • Pharos’ Uniprint “one queue” for all locations • Partnering with other labs • Library runs central server • Other labs don’t need to create their own printing solution • Simplified user experience • Students only have to decide if they’re printing in black & white or color • Print jobs can be picked up in any participating lab
Products • VMware – virtualization • Ericom AccessNow • Dell – hardware and services • Server components • Wyse zero clients • Samsung all-in-one zero clients • PharosUniprint printing • Unidesk – virtualization, layering • Labstats – usage reporting • Sassafras K2 – reporting
More info • vpc.uconn.edu • Blog of what we’ve done, learned • About the Technologies and Equipment used • print.uconn.edu • zero clients: http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/view/vmware-top-five-considerations-for-choosing-a-zero-client-environment-techwp.pdf http://zero-blog.com/2013/04/the-value-of-zero-top-5-reason-to-consider-a-zero-client/