1 / 12

Evaluating Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee Performance during Healthcare Reform in Thailand

This study examines the performance of Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committees (PTCs) in Thai hospitals during a period of healthcare reform, and explores ways to improve PTC performance through the development of practical performance indicators. The results highlight the need for a responsible organization to support and monitor PTCs, as well as the importance of effective PTC Chairpersons and collaboration among PTCs for decision-making. This research provides valuable insights for hospitals aiming to enhance rational drug use activities.

neldam
Download Presentation

Evaluating Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee Performance during Healthcare Reform in Thailand

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Abstract ID: 395

  2. Background • In Thailand, hospitals under the Office of the Permanent Secretary were first required to establish Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committees (PTCs) in 1987. • A Manual of Drug Administration (1987) listed the expected structure, roles and responsibilities of PTCs. • Since 1997, Thai hospitals have faced economic crisis, quality improvement and accreditation, universal coverage health reform and structural change in the Ministry of Public Health (MoPH).

  3. Objectives • To examine PTC performance during this period of change and reform. • To determine the opinion of the PTC Chairpersons and the PTC Secretaries about defining good PTC performance, ways to improving PTC performance, and possible PTC performance indicators. • To create a Manual that provides more practical help on rational drug use activities, including performance indicators.

  4. Methods

  5. Sample & methods • Seventeen hospitals (2 regional hospitals, 3 provincial hospitals, and 12 district hospitals) in 4 regions of Thailand. • Ten key informants who were the Chairperson, the Secretary or members of the PTC were interviewed. • Fifteen key informants who involved with PTC or who are responsible for drug information centers were interviewed. • Questionnaires were distributed to 452 PTC Chairpersons and Secretaries respectively in 25 regional hospitals, 67 provincial hospitals and 360 district hospitals. • Eight key participants who were PTC stakeholders participated in a focus group. • PTCs in 3 regional hospitals were observed.

  6. Questionnaire results (1) • The questionnaire response rate was 36% from PTC Chairpersons and 66% from Secretaries. • Around 90% of PTC Chairpersons were Hospital Directors and 90% of Secretaries were Heads of Pharmacy Department. • The average of the number of PTC members in regional, provincial and district hospitals was 19, 20, and 10 members, respectively. • There were only 2-3 PTC meetings in regional or provincial hospitals and only 1-2 PTC meetings in district hospitals during each fiscal year (from 1996-2002).

  7. Questionnaire results (2) • The most important PTC performance indicators suggested by all PTC Chairpersons: • Is PTC responsible for considering and approving allocation of drug budget proposed by the Pharmacy section? • Does PTC have a document providing criteria for addition and deletion of drug in the hospital drug list? • Does PTC have a policy to develop or implement Clinical Practice Guidelines for common problems such as acute respiratory infection, diarrheal diseases, hypertension, diabetes, epilepsy, and antibiotic prophylaxis, etc.? • Does the PTC monitor Pharmacy drug dispensing to ensure it followswritten standards of pharmacy professional practice? • Does PTC conduct satisfaction surveys on hospital staff to receive feedback on PTC performance?

  8. Questionnaire results (3) • The most important PTC performance indicatorssuggested by PTC Secretaries: • Does a document identifying goal, committee, objectives, and functions of PTC exists? • Is PTC authorised to select drugs to be included and excluded in the hospital drug list? • Does PTC monitor the percentage of drugsused outside hospital drug list? • Does the PTC monitor Pharmacy drug dispensing to ensure it followswritten standards of pharmacy professional practice? • Does PTC have a policy to conduct satisfaction of patients/clients on the hospital treatment service?

  9. Questionnaire results (4) • When asked about the most important factor needed for the development of an effective PTC: • the Chairpersons said it was an effective PTC Secretary; while • the Secretaries said it was an effective PTC Chairperson. • When asked about external factors that can contribute to improved performance of PTC both PTC Chairpersons and Secretaries in all hospitals agreed that the most important aspect was: • a national collaborative drug information center as a hub for information exchange between PTC for a decision making purpose. • In addition, PTC Chairpersons and PTC Secretaries in regional hospitals noted that: • defining the function of PTC in the hospital accreditation criteria would be helpful.

  10. Results (5) • The retrospective document review, in-depth interviews, a focus group and participant observation noted that: • Under new structure of Ministry of Public Health, there was no distinctive responsible organization who support and monitor PTCs. • Some hospitals had not updatedinformation about new PTC members, functions or responsibilities. • Most PTC activities still focused on drug selection and controlling drug budget. Activities on rational drug use were few. • Many PTCs had not set their own specific goals, objectives, role and responsibilities. • Often PTCs had no working plan and there wasalso no orientation about goal, objectives, role and responsibilities for PTC members. • Many suggested the need for a responsible organization (perhaps under the Department of Health Service Support) that would assist PTCs by: • Updating Manual of PTC roles and responsibilities; • Providing opportunities for PTC networking e.g. by web site &/or E-mail discussion groups; • Providing information for PTC to make decisions; • Supporting the incorporation of PTC performance indicators in hospital accreditation (Bureau of Inspection & Evaluation &/or The Institute of Hospital Quality Improvement& Accreditation); • Encouraging Universities to provide educational programs.

  11. Summary • PTCs at all levels of hospital focused their activities on drug selection and budget as this was the main focus of the 1987 “Manual”. • There were limited numbers of meetings of PTCs (1-2 in district hospitals; 2-3 in regional or provincial hospitals). • The recommended PTC performance indicators were the number of PTC meetings and the number of drug items in hospital drug lists. • Suggestions for improving PTC performance: • Setting a responsible organization; • Encouraging educational programs in universities; and • Providing national drug information center and PTC networking.

  12. Conclusion & Policy Implications There is a need for a responsible organization (perhaps under the Department of Health Service Support) that would assist PTCs by: • Updating a Manual regarding PTC roles and responsibilities; • Providing opportunities for PTC networking e.g. by web site &/or E-mail discussion groups; • Providing information for PTC to make decisions; • Supporting the incorporation of PTC performance indicators in hospital accreditation monitored by: • Bureau of Inspection & Evaluation &/or • Institute of Hospital Quality Improvement; • Encouraging Universities to provide PTC educational programs.

More Related