1 / 5

Aim

Canadian Occupational Performance Measure performance scale: Validity and responsiveness in chronic pain. Mieke G. Nieuwenhuizen, MSc, PT; Sonja de Groot, PhD; Thomas W. J. Janssen, PhD; Lia C. C. van der Maas, MSc; Heleen Beckerman, PhD. Aim

nell-campbell
Download Presentation

Aim

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure performance scale: Validity and responsiveness in chronic pain Mieke G. Nieuwenhuizen, MSc, PT; Sonja de Groot, PhD; Thomas W. J. Janssen, PhD; Lia C. C. van der Maas, MSc; Heleen Beckerman, PhD

  2. Aim • Examine construct validity and construct responsiveness of Dutch version of Canadian Occupational Performance Measure performance scale (COPM-P) in chronic pain population. • Relevance • COPM-P has not yet been validated in Dutch pain population.

  3. Method • Subjects: • Newly admitted patients with chronic pain in outpatient rehabilitation clinic. • Measures at admission and 12 wk: • COPM-P, Pain Disability Index (PDI), and RAND 36-Item Health Survey (RAND-36). • Construct validity: • Correlations between COPM-P, PDI, and RAND-36 at admission(n = 87). • Construct responsiveness: • Correlations between change scores at 12 wk (n = 57).

  4. Results • COPM-P did not significantly correlate with PDI or any RAND-36 subscale. • Only a moderate correlation was found between change scores of COPM-P and PDI. • Weak to moderate correlations were found between change scores of COPM-P and RAND-36. • Higher correlations for physical function, social functioning, and role limitations (physical) subscales.

  5. Conclusion • For inpatients with chronic pain attending rehabilitation program, COPM-P measures something different than RAND-36 or PDI. • Therefore, construct validity of COPM-P was not confirmed by our data. • We were not able to find support for COPM-P to detect changes in occupational performance.

More Related