Cross Town Improvement Project Randy W. Butler Transportation Specialist US Department of Transportation Federal Highway

1. Cross Town Improvement Project Randy W. Butler Transportation Specialist US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Office of Freight Management July 28, 2010

2. Contents • Background • Problem Statement • Potential Cross Town Improvement Project (C-TIP) Interchanges • Goal • C-TIP Partners • Components • Operating Scenario • Next Steps

3. Background Where did the C-TIP concept originate? • Intermodal Freight Technology Working Group • Transportation Stakeholder Group • Meets regionally with representatives from: • MPO • Local government representatives • Local economic development groups • Local transportation companies • Introduces new projects to improve both public and private transportation efficiency • Reviews ongoing projects providing user inputs

4. Manufacturer’s Factory Distribution Center  Mean duration of the Deployment Test’s supply chain  Time = 0 160 hours 100 % Target Of Opportunity Shipment awaiting information exchanges to take place 80 % 60 % Percent of 160 Hour Duration Shipment awaiting physical state change, such as shipment consolidation 40 % 20 % Shipment is in movement 0 % Data are based on preliminary qualitative findings collected during baseline activities along the target supply chain. Background

5. Background What is the Cross Town Improvement Project? • Truck-borne “rubber tire” interchanges are used: • When steel wheel rail-to-rail interchanges are not possible • To save time (steel wheel rail-to-rail interchanges often take 2-3 days) • When service criteria for cutoff connection not met • When railroads have car shortages or don’t want to relinquish scarce assets • Interchange of this traffic must occur, often in metropolitan areas • Truck to rail (near ports) • Rail to truck to rail (rail interchanges)

6. Problem Statement • The inefficiency of cross-town rubber tire interchanges creates conditions that adversely impact: • Congestion • Efficiency of the transportation network • Safety of the motoring public • Environment of neighboring communities • Energy consumption

7. Potential Cross Town Improvement Project (C-TIP) Interchanges Red Dots identify locations for cross town opportunities • Scalable and Transferable • Rail-to-rail: cross-continental moves • Port-to-rail: where on-dock rail facilities do not exist • Port-to-truck: port to distribution centers • Airport-to-truck: airport to distribution centers

8. C-TIP Goal To develop and deploy an information sharing / transfer capability that enables the coordination of moves between parties to Maximize loaded moves and Minimize unproductive moves.

9. SC Benefits Competitiveness Lower Prices Enhanced Quality of Life Better SC Performance Greater Attractiveness Reduced Transport Costs Improved Business Environment Goal: Trip Reduction Public Benefits Less Traffic Volume Improved Efficiency Freight Carrier Benefits Reduced Congestion Higher Profitability Better Safety & Environment Better Labor Conditions Public Private Partnerships – C-TIP Goal

10. Public Private Partnerships • Kansas City Pilot Key Players …..All modes are involved and engaged • USDOT – FHWA: Facilitator and Convener • Railroads – UP, BNSF, NS, & KCS • Trucking Companies – Greer, ITS, IXT, Lake Country • State Governments – MoDOT & KDOT • Metropolitan Planning Organizations – Mid America Regional Council • Economic Development Groups – Kansas City SmartPort • Traffic Management Organizations – KC Scout

11. C-TIP Components • Intermodal Exchange (IMEX) • Wireless Drayage Updating (WDU) • Chassis Utilization Tracking (CUT) • Real Time Traffic Monitoring (RTTM) • Dynamic Route Guidance (DRG)

12. Intermodal Exchange (IMEX) Basic Concept – Open architecture allowing for collaborative dispatch management model among rail lines, truckers and facility operators Component Description: An on-line “exchange” allowing the railroads, facility operators, and truckers to share information about available loads, delivery information, traffic and scheduling.

13. Wireless Drayage Updating (WDU) Basic Concept: Develop a set of platform-independent messages and best practices for drivers and dispatchers to communicate regarding routing and scheduling Component Description: Wireless communications system allowing carriers and their drivers the quick exchange of time-sensitive shipment information.

14. Chassis Utilization Tracking (CUT) Basic Concept: Develop a process and system to commonly manage a shared intermodal chassis fleet Component Description: Providing a transparent view of the chassis inventory available for use, including asset locations, and provides mechanisms for accurately allocating costs among users.

15. Real Time Traffic Monitoring (RTTM) Dynamic Route Guidance (DRG) • RTTM Module will make real-time traffic information available to carriers to facilitate travel routing and scheduling decisions. • Receive and process telemetry data from vehicles • Receive and process travel time data from external sources • Combine travel time data in database • Receive and process travel time report requests • Trigger and communicate with the DRG module • Forward travel time reports • DRG Module will Conduct probabilistic calculations against travel time data in RTTM database • Produce predicted travel time on a15-minute basis • Conduct route alternatives analysis • Notify RTTM of recommendation for alternate route

16. Data Inputs to RTTM and DRG • Roadway data • Traffic data • KC Scout data • Telemetry data (at 30 sec. intervals from iPhones via WDU/IMEX) • Device ID • Latitude/Longitude • Time Stamp • Vehicle Speed • Travel Heading • Requests from IMEX • Travel time calculation request (triggered by driver at origin) • Origin/Destination • Truck/Driver ID (optional)

17. Output from RTTM and DRG • Travel time on current route upon request from the driver • Travel time on alternate route based upon decision point-based calculation • List of roadway segments remaining between the decision point and the destination • Pre-recorded audio file to be presented to driver identifying

18. Operating Scenario WDU IMEX • The Scenario: • Cross Town and Industry Containers identified and shared with IMEX • IMEX produces work orders for truck carriers to move containers Deliver CT RR 2 • Truck Carriers query and receive information either through dispatcher or Wireless Drayage component Real Time Traffic RR Containers Identified to move Pickup CT RR 2 • Real Time Traffic information made available through WDU to drayage operators Deliver CT RR 1 Real Time Traffic ! RR Containers Identified to move • Drayage Operator begins trip utilizing real time traffic information and Dynamic Routing. Industry Containers Identified to move • Drayage Operator picks up container at RR1 to move to RR2 Deliver to Industry Pickup CT RR 1 Pickup Industry RR 1 • Drayage Operator begins trip to RR 2 to deliver container • Drayage Operator picks up container at RR 2 to deliver to RR 1 • Drayage Operator picks up container to be delivered to industry at RR 1

19. Performance Measures

20. Where We Go from Here • Conduct Kansas City Pilot Deployment • Deploy system • Conduct operational test & evaluation • Conduct User Conferences • Intermodal Freight Technology Working Group • Kansas City Pilot Participates • Explore applying the C-TIP concept in other environments • Ports, Inland Ports, Airports • Adapt concept of operations to local conditions • Conduct additional pilot deployments

21. Questions Randy Butler US DOT – FHWA 202 366 9215 randy.butler@dot.gov