140 likes | 282 Views
Case study no. 3. Group no. 6. Questione 1. The container must be kept. More documents are requested: - notification from FBO (part I of CED filled in by FBO) - declaration of FBO regarding the use of the product (direct human consumption or process). Questione 2.
E N D
Case study no. 3 Group no. 6
Questione 1 • The container must be kept. • More documents are requested: • - notification from FBO (part I of CED filled in by FBO) • - declaration of FBO regarding the use of the product (direct human consumption or process)
Questione 2 • The product with code no 100620 is not under the Regulation 669/2009. • Annex 1 states the control for Basmati rice (from Pakistan and India) for direct human consumption. • Yes, the evidence is in commercial invoice (description of the product) and bill of lading.
Questione 3 • The container was held in order to complete the documents file. • The product is subject to official control under Reg. 669/2009. • Yes , CEDs are required.
Questione 4 • Yes
Questione 5 • Two documentary checks and 1 phisical checks (50%) • 50% of consignments to be sampled.
Questione 6 • aflatoxins
Questione 7 • Reg 401/2006 and European Guidelines for sampling and determination of aflatoxins
Q 8 • Yes • The consignment stays under official control until results arrive due to provisions of Reg 669/2009.
Q 9 • In case we do not have enough space and appropriate facilities to keep the consignments and check them – art 19 of Reg 212/2010 .
Q 10 • Yes, it is released for free circulation • Advise Customs with Annex 2 – the original form. • The original CED goes with the consignment. • Yes, we keep a copy.
Q 11 • Rejection of consignment and RASFF notification. • FBO will decide to re-export or destroy.
Q 12 • No
Q 13 • FBO can not split the consignment according to the provisions of Reg 669/2009.