240 likes | 341 Views
Similarity of DM/DE and TeVeS HongSheng Zhao @SUPA. Λ CDM WDM Tuned DM-DE (~ Tuned TeVeS μ ). Much ado about mu µ in disk galaxies with Famaey (Brussels), Angus (SUPA), Gentile (NMSU), Nipoti, Londrillo, Ciotti (Bologna)
E N D
Much ado about mu µin disk galaxies with Famaey (Brussels), Angus (SUPA), Gentile (NMSU), Nipoti, Londrillo, Ciotti (Bologna) & high-z elliptical lensing galaxies with Bacon, Taylor, Horne (SUPA), Shan (Beijing) in cosmology with Skordis (Perimeter), Mota (Oslo)
III. TeVeS (Bekenstein 2004) • Einstein-like equations for g, U , scalar by varying the action w.r.t. each of these fields • In a quasi-static system with a weak gravitational field, N+: dτ2 = (1-2) dt2 -(1+2) ( dx2 + dy2 + dz2 ) where obeys a B-M equation, and plays the role of the dark matter potential (dynamics and lensing are governed by the same physical metric g)
Define y = (3k’2/a02) Y, Y=(g-UU),, where k’ k/ 4 is a parameter of the theory y ()2 >0 in quasi-static situation y -(/t)2 <0 in cosmology • Equation for the scalar field in a quasi-static system . [s(y)] = 4G(similar to B-M) • In spherical symmetry gravity: s = / (1- )
Analogy: as dielectric and as inertia • Conservative Field g or E = -▼Φ = d2x/dt2 • Poisson equation ρ = ▼·D or ▼·gN • Electric displacement D = μ E = E + PolarisationField • TeVeS-like theory gN = μ g = g - ScalarField • Newtonian F= minertia g , minertia= m
Scalar field in TeVeS resembles DM • Scalar field (Polarisation Halo of luminous baryon 1-to-1 gravity) • ~ tuned Dark Halo surrounding baryons • NFW profile? µ?
Standard (I): (x) = x / (1+x2)1/2 Exponential: (x) = 1 - e-x Bekenstein toy model: (x) = [(1+4x)1/2 -1] / [(1+4x)1/2 + 1] Simple (III): (x) = x / (1+x) I. Constraining the law of (Zhao & Famaey 2006, ApJ letters) s (gs) = /(1- ) gs = g - g (g)
Milgrom’s standard µ = x/(1+x2)1/2 • Excellent description of data! • Deviation capped ~ a0. • Fast transition of law from Newtonian solar system into non-Newtonian outer galaxy. • But … incompatible with TeVeS!
Fast transitions (implied by data & mu-standard) challenging for TeVeS • Less freedom in mu than in 1-field MOND. • Bekenstein mu excluded by RC data. • Scalar field must increase from galaxies (a0) to solar system • untailored mu will overrun Pioneer limit (<10a0).
Problems with earlier laws of • Milgrom’s standard -law too sharp, • leads to multi-valued TeVeS L and problems with external field. • Bekenstein’s too gradual • unlike in real galaxy RC.
The standard and exponential functions are excluded (multi-valued), but good to fit RC’s • Bekenstein’s toy is ok in TeVeS, but poor fit to the TVC of the Milky Way (Famaey & Binney 2005), same conclusion in spiral galaxy NGC 3198
A narrow range of mu is allowed • alpha-model in Angus, Famaey, Zhao [Poster] & Gentile, Famaey, Zhao [Poster] • Curl-field correction [Nipoti’s talk]
The Simple Function = x / (1+x) = / (a0 + ) gives a good fit to RC’s and corresponds to a plausible TeVeS s(y) • Simple ’s corresponding scalar field function is s = / (a0 - α ) , α=1 (Zhao-Famaey) = s / (1+ s ) = / a0
Deeper Physics Beyond Simplicity? In spherical symmetry: Newtonian FN = minertia g , minertia= m ExtraForce |Fs|= minertiaa0 , with a0 ~c
Test mu where it is not made for: Elliptical Lenses, SNe, Cosmology!
Metric of Homogeneous Universe Hubble expansion in TeVeS
Solar System ? ? Tides on Globulars & dSph Rot. curves HSB/LSB Lensing by Ellipticals/Clusters SNIa/CMB Updating Scores LCDM TeVeS