Deconstructing EIT Waves (remarks on this intriguing phenomenon)

1. Deconstructing EIT Waves(remarks on this intriguing phenomenon) • Marco Velli • Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech and • Dipartimento di Astronomia e Scienza dello Spazio, Università di Firenze Thompson et al. 1999

2. “EIT waves” large scale propagating disturbances and associated with brightenings and dimmings found with running and fixed difference images using extreme ultraviolet telescope, occurring in connection with CMEs and flares (Moses et al. 97, Thompson et al.98) Summary of a somewhat bewildering set of observations Summary of models Open questions, relative observations, and future diagnostic use of global MHD perturbations of the solar corona

3. Basic observational characteristics of EIT waves EIT wave and associated brightening/dimming (fixed difference images) EIT wave progression (running difference images) Propagate with nearly circular symmetry in the simple corona

4. Typical velocities 170-350 km/s (271 km/s av) Klassen et al. 00 In complex corona, avoid active regions, neutral lines, stop near coronal holes

5. Moreton waves - (Moreton 1961; Athay & Moreton 1961; Ramsey & Smith 1966) seen in Ha images. Observed to propagate out to large distances from the flare sites, with evidence of chromospheric depression seen in the wings of the Ha bandpass. The inferred speeds in the range 330 - 4200 km/s (Smith & Harvey 1971); such high speeds are generally accepted as evidence of a coronal, rather than a chromospheric origin for this phenomenon. Explanation given in classic paper by Uchida (1968) which analyzes the WKB propagation of fast modes in a spherically symmetric stratified geometry with a radial magnetic field. Natural to think of EIT waves as a coronal counterpart of Moreton waves. Driven by a “blast”

6. An aside: polar and Friedrichs diagrams: here Vs=0.9Va

7. Shock fronts from a point “supersonic” object Cs=0.8 Va here In general slow cusps even smaller and aligned with Va. Such Modes should lose coherence very very quickly unless supported by some “effective surface”

8. (Khan & Aurass, 2002) Warmuth et al. 2001: At least in some cases Halpha and EIT wave cospatiality is established (1997 November 3 and 1998 May 2), favoring blast-wave fast mode shock scenario

9. Running difference images EIT 195Å Wu et al, 2001: 3D, time-dependent, numerical MHD model Pressure pulse BUT:a very slow fast mode (high beta or low B corona)

10. Sturrock - Shibata 2 ribbon flare and CME unified scenario Chen argues in favor of a combined model explaining both Moreton and EIT waves in terms of erupting CME or piston model

11. Numerical MHD simulations. Erupting CME induces piston-driven shock (coronal Moreton wave?) But the “EIT wave” corresponds to a density front moving behind the shock front. The “EIT wave” results from the combination of the stretching of closed field lines covering the erupting flux and the propagation of the consequent Alfvén wave down the field lines overarching the rope. (Chen et al. 2002; Chen, Fang & Shibata 2005)

12. The “slow” EIT wave propagation is obtained by combining the piston-propagation time with the fast (Alfvén) propagation time along longer and longer loops:

13. Scenario more specifically ties propagation of EIT wave to dimmings and reconnection and onset of the CME (Delannee’ 2000, Zhukov and Auchere 2004) “These observations suggest that EIT wave can be regarded as a bimodal phenomenon. The wave mode represents a wave-like propagating disturbance. Its characteristic features are propagation of a bright front to large distances from dimming sites and quasi-circular appearance. The eruptive mode is the propagation of a dimming and of an EIT wave as a result of successive opening of magnetic field lines during the CME lift-off. It can be identified by noting the expansion of a dimming and the appearance of another dimming ahead of a bright front.”

14. EC EC front front dimmings dimmings EIT wave front rotation Podladchkova and Berghmans 2005

15. Rotation of EIT wave fronts Podladchikova and Berghmans 2005, Attrill et al. 2007 Rotation of brightening in counter clockwise sense` ~

16. Intensity around bright front: Confirms somewhat controversial result of Podladchikova & Berghmans (2005)  ACWrotation  CW rotation 12th May 1997 event 7th April 1997 event 16 Attrill et al. 07

17. Attrill et al 2007 12th May 1997 ACW event 7th April 1997 CW event Forward “S” Sigmoid  Positive Helicity Reverse “S” sigmoid  Negative Helicity  CW rotation  ACWrotation

18. CME flux rope eruption Evolution in two phases: First a twisted flux rope is created, slow and almost quasi-static; second a disruption, which is confined for a small initial helicity and global for a large initial helicity. Following the evolution of flux rope AND waves in such geometries is computationally difficult. Kink in itself tendentially slow/alfvenic Extended unfolding wave source, might conceivably explain rotation of wave front Amari et al. 2003

19. Attrill model: multiple small scale reconnection events Deep core dimmings and widespread transient dimmings -> evacuated plasma -> mass of CME (Zhukov & Auchére 2004).

20. Summing up for origin of EIT Waves • A) Wave Theories • FAST • + avoids regions of large Alfven speed, whether they be active regions or coronal holes. • Halpha correspondence (Vrshnak paper) • - why such low speeds? There may be selection effects (17 minute cadence, 1000 secs., 1000km/sec wave travels over 1 solar radius) • SLOW • + perhaps the overall speed of the perturbation • it is hard to reconcile with the coherent structure required for the propagation of such a front in the widely varying coronal topology. • ALFVEN • --- no density perturbation, collimation and extremely anisotropic propagation However, an extended source (erupting loop) • might help out.

21. B) CME pseudo-wave or reconnection wave + ways to make a speed which is lower than the sound speed - how do you explain correlation of front rotation with helicity? Why is the EIT wave circular or quasi circular, and not ribbon like (as in two ribbon flares) or even more structured if it depends on reconnection with peripheral magnetic fields? (Or is this precisely what the Zhukov and Auchere and Delannee observations show?) STEREO: Higher cadence (to start with, accurate determination of front propagation speeds). Accurate wave identification/measurement allows coronal diagnostics.

23. Propagation of EIT waves and their effects on coronal structures (Ofman and Thompson 2002)

24. EIT waves require a CME Cliver et al 2005

25. 25