1 / 12

Key Outcomes for Model/Demonstration Projects: Project MP3

Key Outcomes for Model/Demonstration Projects: Project MP3. Edward S. Shapiro Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University. OSEP Project Director’s Conference – July 22, 2008. Key Objective. Leave the best behind in process when we go

neona
Download Presentation

Key Outcomes for Model/Demonstration Projects: Project MP3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Key Outcomes for Model/Demonstration Projects:Project MP3 Edward S. Shapiro Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University OSEP Project Director’s Conference – July 22, 2008

  2. Key Objective • Leave the best behind in process when we go • Provide clear method for ongoing evaluation of outcome

  3. Key Questions for Outcome • Student Level • Risk level changes across time • Movement across tiers • Movement within tiers • Special education referral rates • Systems Level • Sustainability of model • Fidelity of implementation

  4. Direct and Indirect Evaluation Outcomes • Direct Outcomes • Data based on student performance • Observational data • Qualitative data from focus groups • Indirect Outcomes • Data from processes part of model

  5. Student Level Outcomes-Risk Level

  6. Student Level Outcomes-Across Tier Movement

  7. Student Level Outcomes-Within Tier Movement

  8. Systems Level – Sustainability& Fidelity- Indicators of Independence • Observation at Schools in Year 2 & 3 • Are they implementing components on their own? • Develop rating scale with rubric for implementation? • Quality of meetings? • How much are teams relying on data for decision? • Still conducting progress monitoring for Tier 2 and 3 at the defined schedule? • Still conducting grade level meetings with same regularity?

  9. Progress Monitoring-Are they implementing?

  10. Progress Monitoring- Changes?

  11. Progress Monitoring – Are they implementing in lag schools

  12. Progress Monitoring- Changes- Are they implementing in lag schools

More Related