1 / 27

Internet and the 1996 Act

Internet and the 1996 Act. Impact of the Act on Internet evolution Internet as « inspiration ». NII prototype. new network paradigm inspired NII political program industrial policy ? “stimulate” (neither regulate nor litigate... yet) spin-offs from DARPA programs. Governance.

neorah
Download Presentation

Internet and the 1996 Act

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Internet and the 1996 Act • Impact of the Act on Internet evolution • Internet as « inspiration »

  2. NII prototype • new network paradigm • inspired NII political program • industrial policy? • “stimulate” (neither regulate nor litigate... yet) • spin-offs from DARPA programs

  3. Governance • competition modalities (on what basis) • tariffs and pricing • interconnection • universal service / cross-subsidies

  4. User-driven Experimentation • infrastructure technologies • applications and services • path dependence

  5. Willingness to pay Demand:p=n(N-n) Supply Three equilibria: 1) Failure 2) Critical Mass 3) Network size Network size

  6. Internet adoption in comparative perspective

  7. History: 3 periods • Defense • Research • mass-medium

  8. Defense - ARPANET (1970s) • 1969: BBN wins RFP • Protocol (TCP/IP) and Gateways • Three basic applications • e-mail • file transfer (FTP) • remote login (Telnet)

  9. Research - NSFNet (1980s) • NSF backbone linking supercomputer centers • One backbone • Regionals: BARRnet, Merit, NYSernet • three dominant applications • Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) and commercialization: expanding visions • “privatisation” of NSFNet April 30, 1995

  10. Mass Medium (1990s) • New Structure • several nationwide backbones - National Service Providers (NSPs) • Thousands of Internet Service Providers (ISPs) • Network Access Points (NAPs)

  11. Emerging Industry Structure • 2-3 Backbone providers ?? • lots of ISPs for small customers • direct connection to NSPs for big customers

  12. Retail

  13. Wholesale

  14. New Governance, and its limits. • Service and Pricing structure • Best-effort delivery • Sender keep all • Flat fee pricing (binary logic) • BUT congestion, different service level requirements.

  15. New Governance (cont’d) • Interconnection and peering • Decentralized governance - Difference with phone network • Incentives for cooperation • Emerging tensions • Standard setting • Cooperative / democratic • IETF, IAB, • emerging tensions

  16. Four Key Success Factors • Expanding Community of Users • Users invent it • Pricing: Network’s binary logic • Decentralized governance

  17. Emerging Issues • Congestion • Peering • Broadband • Future of end-to-end

  18. Congestion • Local access and Backbone • Pricing solutions • Quality of Service

  19. Interconnection: Peering • From multilaterals to bilaterals • Peering vs. Transit • NAP Control • FCC approach (Kende) • Decentralized, cooperative approach was good because didn't require regulation • Assess market competition • Antitrust remedies if there is a problem

  20. How different from “old issues”? • industry structure (monopoly,...) • Natural Monopoly? • Tariffs, access charges and int’l settlements • Cross-subsidies • Innovation at the end

  21. Internet and Freedom: Jeffersonian myths • Internet can't be regulated • Tech • decentralized architecture • no single control point • cooperative governance • "routes around censorship" • Government has no "moral right" over new space (cyberspace) and no credible means of enforcement (Barlow)

  22. "Jeffersonian syndrome" • Political: direct democracy • Self-governing communities • Economic: Perfect markets

More Related