1 / 30

ECON 339X: Agricultural Marketing

ECON 339X: Agricultural Marketing. Chad Hart Assistant Professor chart@iastate.edu 515-294-9911. John Lawrence Professor jdlaw@iastate.edu 515-294-7801. Today’s Topic. “New Generation” Contracts. Contracting. Basic Hedge-to-Arrive Basis Deferred Price Minimum Price New Generation

netis
Download Presentation

ECON 339X: Agricultural Marketing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ECON 339X: Agricultural Marketing Chad Hart Assistant Professor chart@iastate.edu 515-294-9911 John Lawrence Professor jdlaw@iastate.edu 515-294-7801

  2. Today’s Topic “New Generation” Contracts

  3. Contracting • Basic Hedge-to-Arrive • Basis • Deferred Price • Minimum Price • New Generation • Automated Pricing • Managed Hedging • Combination

  4. Hedge-to-Arrive • Allows producer to lock futures price, but leaves the basis open • Basis is determined at a later date, prior to delivery on the contract • So the producer still faces basis risk and production risk (must produce enough crop to cover the contract) • The buyer takes on the futures price risk

  5. Hedge-to-Arrive • Why might you use it? • Think basis will strengthen before delivery • For the producer, the gain/loss on the contract is due to basis moves • Available in roll and non-roll varieties

  6. Basis Contract • Also known as a “fix price later” contract • Allows producer to lock in basis level, but leaves futures price open • Producer still faces futures price risk and production risk • Buyer takes on basis risk

  7. Basis Contract • Why might you use it? • Expect higher futures prices, but possibly weaker basis • Example • On July 1, producer sells 5,000 bushels of corn for November delivery at 20 cents under December futures. • On Nov. 1, Dec. futures set the futures price

  8. Deferred Price Contract • Also known as “no price established” contract • Allows producer to deliver crop without setting sales price • Buyer takes delivery and charges fee for allowing price deferral • Producer still faces all price risk and production risk (if contract is set before delivery)

  9. Deferred Price Contract • Producer also faces counterparty risk • If buyer files for bankruptcy, the producer becomes an unsecured creditor • Why would you use it? • Believe market prices are on the rise • Takes care of storage • Allows producer to lock prices at a later time • Producer benefits from higher prices and stronger basis, but risks lower prices and weaker basis

  10. Minimum Price Contract • Allows producer to establish a minimum price in exchange for a service fee and the cost of an option • The final price is set later at the choice of the producer • If prices are below the minimum price, the producer gets the minimum price • If prices are above the minimum price, the producer captures a higher price

  11. Minimum Price Contract • Removes downside price risk (below minimum price) and allows upside potential (after adjusting for fees) • Producer looking price increases to offset fees • Provides some predictability in pricing, can be set to be cash-flow needs

  12. New Generation Contracts • Ever evolving set of contracts established to assist producers and users in marketing crops • Structured to overcome marketing challenges • Inability to follow through on marketings • Marketing decisions triggered by emotion • Complexities and costs of marketing tools

  13. New Generation Contracts • Often broken into three categories • Automated pricing • Managed hedging • Combination contracts • Offered by several companies, each with its own twist on the contract • I will highlight some available contracts (for illustrative purposes only, not an endorsement

  14. New Generation Contracts • The contract follow predetermined pricing rules • Often sold in set bushel increments, like futures and options, with a specified delivery period • Some have exit clauses (depending on price)

  15. Automated Pricing • In its purest form, basically locks in an average price by marketing equal amounts of grain each period within a set time • Could be daily or weekly • Some contracts allow producers to pick the pricing period • Can be combined with other pricing approaches (minimum price, etc.)

  16. Automated Pricing • Examples • AgriVisor – Index Pricing • E-Markets – Market Index Forward • Cargill – PacerPro • CGB – Equalizer Classic • Variations • CGB – Equalizer Traditional • Cargill – PacerPro Ultra • E-Markets – Seasonal Index Forward

  17. Automated Pricing Pricing period: Jan. to Mar. 2011 on Nov. 2011 soybean futures

  18. Automated Pricing • Advantages • Automates marketing decision, frees up producer time • Removes concerns about additional costs (margin calls) • Can be set to capture average price when seasonal highs are usually hit

  19. Managed Hedging • Automated contracts that implement pricing based on recommendations from market analysts • Example • Cargill – MarketPros • Producers can choose to follow CargillPros or Kluis Commodities recommendations

  20. Managed Hedging • Has many of the same advantages as automated pricing • Results are dependent on the performance of the market analysts • Often has higher fees than automated pricing • Automated pricing: 3-5 cents/bushel • Managed hedging: 10-15 cents/bushel

  21. Combination Contracts • Extend or combine mechanisms from various contracts • Averaging pricing • Minimum pricing • Pricing based on market movements • Opt-out clauses if prices fall significantly • Come in many varieties, so producers can find one to fit their needs

  22. Cargill – DiversiMax • Price is set by formula • 75% of the price is determined by the average daily high futures price during a specified pricing period • 25% of the price is determined by the highest price observed during the pricing period • Can be linked to a commitment to market additional grain (the commitment reduces the fee charged) Source: http://www.cargillpropricing.com/contracts.html

  23. AgriVisor • Accelerator Pricing • Markets bushels when prices exceed a floor price, but marketed quantities depend on price level • For example, Source: http://www.agrivisor.com/Services/CrossoverSolutions.aspx

  24. AgriVisor • Topper Pricing • Markets bushels when prices exceed a floor price on days where prices have jumped sharply • Example: Markets bushels when prices exceed $13.00/bushel on days where prices have increased by at least 15 cents/bushel • Takes immediate advantage of market rallies Source: http://www.agrivisor.com/Services/CrossoverSolutions.aspx

  25. AgriVisor Source: http://www.agrivisor.com/Services/CrossoverSolutions.aspx

  26. AgriVisor Source: http://www.agrivisor.com/Services/CrossoverSolutions.aspx

  27. FC Stone • Accumulator Contract • Versions for producers and consumers • Key parameters: • Accumulator price – price grain is sold (or bought) at • Knockout price – price that terminates the contract • Weekly bushel sales commitment • Has acceleration function if price move beyond accumulator price Source: http://www.intlfcstone.com/commodities/grains/Pages/OriginationTools.aspx

  28. FC Stone – Accumulator Quantity marketed doubles Normal quantity marketed Contract ends Source: http://www.intlfcstone.com/commodities/grains/Pages/OriginationTools.aspx

  29. FC Stone – Consumer Accumulator Contract ends Normal quantity bought Quantity bought doubles Source: http://www.intlfcstone.com/commodities/grains/Pages/OriginationTools.aspx

  30. Class web site: http://www.econ.iastate.edu/~chart/Classes/econ339/Spring2011/

More Related