230 likes | 545 Views
ITL RESEARCH – LEAP21. Deirdre Butler January 2012. ITL Research. A multi-year global research program designed to investigate the factors that promote the transformation of teaching practices and the impact those changes have on students’ learning outcomes
E N D
ITL RESEARCH – LEAP21 Deirdre Butler January 2012
ITLResearch • A multi-year global research program • designed to investigate the factors that promote the transformation of teaching practices • and the impact those changes have on students’ learning outcomes • across a broad range of country contexts
National Board of Education, Finland Russian Academy of Education and Academy for Teachers Training, Russia Specialist Schools and Academies Trust, UK Ministry of National Education, Indonesia National Ministry of Education, Mexico New South Wales Department of Education and Training, Australia National Ministry of Education, Senegal
ITL RESEARCH 2011 POLICY PARTNERS Country Organization Individuals • KristiinaKumpulainen (PhD), Director, Information and Evaluation Services • Kaisa Vähähyyppä, Councilor of Education, Head of Unit Finland National Board of Education • Fasli Jalal, Vice Minister of National Education • SuwasihMadya, Head, Education Services of the Province of Yogyakarta Ministry of National Education (MONE)Province of Yogyakarta Indonesia • Russian Academy of Education and World Bank projects representative (National Training Foundation) • The Academy for teachers training and professional retraining for educators (APKiPPRO) • Mr. Uvarov, Leading expert and researcher, Computer Center, Russian Academy of Sciences • Ms. Gorbunova, Vice-rector Russia Senegal Ministry of Education (National), Senegal Mr. Ibrahima NDOUR, Director of Secondary Schools England The Schools Network Mr. Chris Montacute, Strategic Director Lic. Margarita Arruti, CoordinaciónNacionalHDT, DGME, SEB, DirectoraOperativaHDT Mexico Ministry of Education (Federal) Max Smith, Senior Manager, Student Engagement and Program Evaluation New South Wales Department of Education and Training Australia 4
ITL RESEARCH 2011 RESEARCH PARTNERS Country Organization Research Leads Agora Center / Institute for Educational ResearchUniversity of Jyväskylä • Marja Kankaanranta • Juho-Matti Norrena Finland • Medelina K. Hendytio • VidhyandikaD. Perkasa • DeniFriawan • TeguhYudoWicaksono Indonesia Centre for Strategic and International Studies • Alexei L. Semenov • Olga B. Loginova • VadimV. Kroutov Russia Institute of New Technologies • Abdourahmane Mbengue • Cheikh Tidiane Sall • Cheikh Mbacke Cisse Association of Teachers and Researchers of ICT in Education and Training Senegal • Neil Selwyn • Carey Jewitt • Carlo Perrotta England London Knowledge Lab • Lucía Fernanda Remes • Bernardo Naranjo Mexico ProyectoEducativoSC • Sid Bourke • Kathryn Holmes • Kylie Shaw • Greg Preston Australia University of Newcastle, SORTI 5
ITL RESEARCH MIXED METHODS USED Education System Change 159 survey schools 21 site visit schools Across School Leadership and Culture Teacher & School Leader Interviews 86* teachers 18* school leaders Teacher & School Leader Surveys 4,038 teachers 159 school leaders Innovative Teaching Practices Classroom Observations 81* classrooms Learning Activity Analysis 967 learning activities Student Work Analysis 3,367 student work Student Focus Groups 33* focus groups Individuals with skills for life and work today *approximate N Methods Published at: www.itlresearch.com
SKILLS FOR LIFE ANDWORK TODAY Knowledge building Problem solving & innovation Self-regulation & assessment ICT use Global awareness Collaboration Skilled communication
ARE INNOVATIVE TEACHING PRACTICES ASSOCIATED WITH 21ST CENTURY LEARNING OUTCOMES? Students 21C Skills Score Relationship between innovative teaching scores and student’s work on 21c skill dimensions When educators provide learning activities that ask for 21 C skills, students can and do demonstrate those skills. Learning Activities/Innovative Teaching Source: ITL 2011, LASW method, based on analysis by SRI International
Innovative Teaching Practices • . ICT Integration Education System Change Extension of Learning Beyond the Classroom School Leadership and Culture Student Centered Pedagogy Innovative Teaching Practices • Knowledge Building • Self-regulation & Assessment • Collaboration • Skilled Communication • Problem Solving & Innovation • Global Awareness • ICT Use Individuals with skills for life and work today 10
AND STUDENTS USE ICT… Basic uses of ICT High level uses of ICT Based on analysis by SRI International Source: ITL teacher survey, 2011
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATIVE TEACHING PRACTICES 0,28 Practice a new teaching method Conducted individual or collaborative research on a particular topi 0,25 Planned or practiced using ICT in teaching (for example, planning a) 0,23 0,23 Reviewed and discussed student work 0,18 Observed a demonstration of ICT use Developed or reviewed curriculum materials 0,18 Received or delivered one-on-one coaching or mentoring 0,17 0,15 Planned a lesson or a unit 0,15 Observed a demosntration of a lesson 0,03 Listened to a lecture Source: ITL teacher survey, 2011 Based on analysis by SRI International
Previous uses of this approach In the USA • School reform in Chicago (Bryk, Nagaoka & Newmann, 2000) • “Authenticity” and “intellectual complexity” • Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation • “Rigor” and “relevance” • National Writing Project • “Best practices in writing instruction” • CRESST, UCLA (Matsumura & Pascal) • “Instructional quality” Internationally • Singapore: Koh & Luke • “Authentic assessments” • Microsoft Innovative Schools Program Evaluation • “21st-century learning opportunities”
“21st century skills” are easy to talk about as abstractions, but hard to define, develop and measure. Looking at instructional artifacts (learning activities, student work or LASW): Helps us see what’s really happening in classrooms Gives us specific metrics for measuring progress Gives teachers a common language to discuss teaching practice Assessing 21st-Century Skills
ITL Student Work Dimensions All ITL Research tools and methods are available at www.itlresearch.com.
General rules to consider • Consider the age of the students when assigning a code • Select your code based on evidence, not based on your inferences (guesses) • Select your codes for the Learning Activity based only on the qualities defined in the rubric for a given dimension. • When it is difficult to decide between two codes (for example, between Code 2 and Code 3), give the lower code. • To identify the main requirement or effort for an artifact (necessary for some dimensions), look for what students appear to have spent the most time and effort doing.
Anchor lessons • Native People • House on Mango • Olympics Site Selection • Erosional landforms • Design a Catapult
Go raibhmílemaithagaibh Thank you For access to these methods as they are developed, as well as research on their effectiveness, please visit http://itlresearch.com