80 likes | 158 Views
Hardware Independent Voting Systems. Caveats. I am not talking about nor endorsing internet voting (or the slippery slope to lead to it) There are many variations on the setup of what I am talking about We need to begin to understand the implications of this. What I Know.
E N D
Caveats • I am not talking about nor endorsing internet voting (or the slippery slope to lead to it) • There are many variations on the setup of what I am talking about • We need to begin to understand the implications of this
What I Know THE CURRENT SYSTEM IS NOT SUSTAINABLE!!!
Current Situation • Jurisdictions use Hardware specific systems • Most systems purchased just before or just after passage of HAVA in 2002 • Systems are getting older and need continued and increasing maintenance • States & Counties don’t have money • Safe to assume no money is coming
What does this look like? • Voting specific software that displays a ballot and allows the ballot to be marked • Software can be loaded onto COTS hardware • Tabulation can be achieved in a variety of ways
What does this do? • Eliminates the need for expensive hardware maintenance contracts • Takes advantage of newest COTS hardware technology • Could limit cost and time of testing • Fixes and upgrades more readily available
Challenges • Setup is akin to component certification • Current standards and program not setup to handle this • How to handle COTS • Election official IT support • More...