1 / 6

IPO Performance Comparison: China, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Turkey

Explore the average annual first-day returns and volume for IPOs in China, Germany, Japan, South Korea, and Turkey. Prof. Jay R. Ritter provides data from various sources spanning 1990-2015, highlighting key trends.

nheard
Download Presentation

IPO Performance Comparison: China, Germany, Japan, South Korea, Turkey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Average Annual First-day Returns and Volume, for China, Germany, Japan, S. Korea, and Turkey Prof. Jay R. Ritter University of Florida November 2015

  2. Number of Offerings and Average First-day Returns on Korean IPOs, 1980-2014 Sources: Byung Kyun Ihm, Sung-Il Cho,Sung Wook Joh, Seokhoon Lee

  3. Number of Offerings (bars) and First-day Returns on Turkish IPOs, 1990-2015 Sources: HalilKitmaz, BanuDurukan, GurayKucukkocaoglu, OrhanEmre Elma, Dealogic, and the Borsa Istanbul. 2015 numbers are for the first six months only.

  4. Number of Offerings and Average First-day Returns on Chinese IPOs, 1990-2014(There were no IPOs in 2013, due to a CSRC moratorium starting in October 2012) Source: Jia, Xie, and Zhang (2014)

  5. Number of Offerings and Average First-day Returns on Japanese IPOs, 1980-2014 Source: Takashi Kaneko and others

  6. Number of Offerings and Average First-Day Returns on German IPOs, 1980-2015 For 2015, the numbers are for January-November

More Related