1 / 0

WHAT NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FLORIDA AMENDMENT 3

WHAT NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FLORIDA AMENDMENT 3. PRESENTED BY THE FLORIDA NONPROFIT ALLIANCE. Special Guest Presenters. Deirdre Macnab , President, League of Women Voters of Florida Mark Turner, Public Policy Director, Colorado Nonprofit Association.

nhu
Download Presentation

WHAT NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FLORIDA AMENDMENT 3

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WHAT NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FLORIDA AMENDMENT 3 PRESENTED BY THE FLORIDA NONPROFIT ALLIANCE
  2. Special Guest Presenters Deirdre Macnab, President, League of Women Voters of Florida Mark Turner, Public Policy Director, Colorado Nonprofit Association
  3. Constitutional Amendments on 2012 Ballot 11 constitutional amendments on the 2012 ballot Require a 60% margin to become law All were generated by the Florida Legislature within the last 2 years No citizen initiatives on the ballot this year
  4. Florida’s Tax Revenue in Comparison Florida is the 4th largest state in the Union. Here is where Florida ranks in terms of overall tax burden: 46 other states have higher taxes as a percentage of personal income (1) 42 other states have higher tax revenue per person (1) 38 other states have a higher corporate tax rate (2)
  5. Public Spending in Florida Here is where Florida ranks in terms of Elementary-Secondary per pupil spending: On average, the U.S. as whole spends $10,499 per pupil. Florida, on the other hand, spends $8,760, which puts us behind 37 other states. (3) Florida’s government workforce has shrunk over the last decade, and is now the smallest and the cheapest in the country on a per-capita basis. (4)
  6. Amendment 3: State Government Revenue Limitation An attempt to impose a new formula for calculating the state’s revenue cap
  7. The Colorado Example: TABOR Colorado adopted a similar provision in 1992. However, after state funding fell for schools, public safety, healthcare and transportation, Coloradoans voted to suspend TABOR in 2005. At this time, over 30 states have considered similar measures, but no other state has passed it.
  8. A Vote YES on Amendment 3 would: Replace the existing state revenue limitation based on personal income growth with a new, more restrictive limitation based on changes in population and inflation Restrict government revenue (taxes, licenses, fees, fines, or charges for services) in good and poor economic times Limit the Legislature’s ability to increase revenue beyond what the formula allows
  9. A Vote NO on Amendment 3 would: Maintain the existing state revenue limitation based on personal income growth Protect the state’s ability to provide the current level of government services Preserve the Legislature’s current flexibility in responding to budgetary concerns and changing economic conditions
  10. Be Ready to Vote in 2012! 3 Ways to Vote: By Mail, Early or on Election Day Check your voter status at: www.BeReadyToVote.org You can update your: Address Name Political party Absentee ballot request Signature Help educate your friends and family Book the League to speak to your community, civic, religious or political organization
  11. Questions for Deirdre?

  12. Colorado’s Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR)

    Mark Turner Director of Public Policy Colorado Nonprofit Association 455 Sherman St. Suite 207, Denver CO 80203 - 303-832-5710 www.ColoradoNonprofits.org
  13. “TABOR” A constitutional tax and expenditure limit approved by CO voters in 1992. Written by Doug Bruce, Colorado Springs lawyer and real estate developer Passed in 1992 with 53% of the vote after three previous attempts.
  14. Colorado “TABOR” – 1992 Requires voter approval of any state or local tax, debt, mill levy or other “net revenue” increase Revenue limit: previous year’s revenue times growth in the inflation rate + population rate Revenue above the limit is “rebated” to taxpayers
  15. Colorado “TABOR” – 1992 Requires voter approval to weaken existing state spending limits “Ratchet effect”- revenue limit based on lesser of actual previous year revenues vs. revenues allowed by the formula.
  16. Colorado “TABOR” – 1992 ‘90-’01 General fund revenue boom- 7.8% growth per year on average, from $2.6 to $9.4 billion Between ‘96 and ’01, Colorado rebated $3.2 billion in “TABOR surplus” to taxpayers Legislative Council ‘93 report- ”TABOR's contribution to the state's economic prosperity, if any, cannot be statistically quantified.”
  17. Colorado “TABOR” – 1992 2001-2003 recession - $1.1 billion in cuts, no TABOR surplus Ratchet: limits based on lower revenue base 2004-2005: Economy recovering but Colorado had both a shortfall and a TABOR surplus
  18. Nonprofit Colorado: Economic Impact 67% increased requests to foundations in 2004 (Colorado Nonprofit Assn. Survey) 54% increased individual donor requests (Colorado Nonprofit Assn. Survey survey) Colorado ranked 43rd in the nation in charitable giving (Catalogue for Philanthropy)
  19. Governor Bill Owens (R)2005 “State of the State” “General Fund dollars available under TABOR – after paying required Amendment 23 and Medicaid expenses – will not keep pace with the demands on the budget. As a result, we cannot take the steps we must take to build a brighter future for all of Colorado, and particularly our children.”
  20. Colorado’s 2005 Referendum C Compromise between Governor and D legislature Suspended TABOR revenue limits from 2005-2010 allowing the state to keep all revenues collected No effect on existing tax rates Eliminated the ratchet, reset the revenue base 85% of Colorado cities and counties have voted to “de-bruce” – i.e. suspend local revenue limits on property tax revenues TABOR surplus may return around 2014
  21. Nonprofit Voice Project

  22. Demand for services has grown.Revenues haven’t kept pace.

    Governor Hickenlooper FY 2012-2013 Proposed Budget to JBC
  23. Colorado’s Tax Burden Is Low(compared to other states) Legislative Council
  24. Colorado Invests Less in Public Services(compared to other states) Colorado Fiscal Policy Institute, 2009
  25. Changes in Funding of CO Public Services JBC Staff Documents; Ed News Colorado
  26. TABOR and Colorado’s Future Colorado’s still a growing state but revenues aren’t keeping pace with demand Voters have the final say on increasing revenues and amending the constitution TABOR’s CPI (inflation) + population formula does not capture growth in costs of public services. CPI measures what consumers buy not what governments buy

  27. Thank you…

    Mark Turner Director of Public Policy Colorado Nonprofit Association 455 Sherman St. Suite 207, Denver CO 80203 - 303-832-5710 www.ColoradoNonprofits.org

  28. Questions for Mark?

  29. Additional Resources Center for Budget and Policy Priorities Report on Florida Amendment 3: http://www.cbpp.org/cms/index.cfm?fa=view&id=3831 PICO United Florida “ NO on 3 Campaign”: http://www.picoflorida.org/events/no-on-3 Center for Lobbying in the Public Interest: http://www.clpi.org/ Nonprofit Vote: http://www.nonprofitvote.org/
More Related