1 / 15

Water Resource Implications of Minnesota’s Biofuel Development

Water Resource Implications of Minnesota’s Biofuel Development. Sangwon Suh Dept. Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering University of Minnesota. Ethanol mandates. 3,140,000. Water need for ethanol. X ca 800. Million. 3. Where the water is used?. 17,700. Source: Delta-T corp.

nibal
Download Presentation

Water Resource Implications of Minnesota’s Biofuel Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Water Resource Implications of Minnesota’s Biofuel Development Sangwon Suh Dept. Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering University of Minnesota

  2. Ethanol mandates

  3. 3,140,000 Water need for ethanol X ca 800 Million 3

  4. Where the water is used? 17,700 Source: Delta-T corp.

  5. MN ethanol plants’ water use rate Water use / ethanol production (gallon/gallon) Source: DNR (2006) and own data collected

  6. Where the water come from?

  7. Comparing with state total Billion Gallons per year (in year 2007)

  8. Water-intensive industry? Estimations based on water use, water price, and ethanol production data (own data collected; Smith et al., 2008; Dept. public health, 2008; DNR, 2007)

  9. Comparing EtOH Water Appropriation

  10. Source Water

  11. Multidisciplinary Efforts • Two testimonials to Legislative Citizens Commission for Minnesota Resources (LCCMR). • Substantial media coverage on the issue, but often with conflicting information. • Two new projects: (1) from LCCMR, (2) USDA/DOE. • Meeting with John Wells – various activities around the issue across MN.

  12. Serial Meetings • We’ll continually arrange integrated meetings • How the issue is perceived by the expert groups? • What can we do as a group of experts to better inform the general public and policy makers on water implications of biofuel development? • What are the knowledge/data gaps to better understand the issue? • Is there a common methodological/modeling ground for analysis?

  13. Objectives of the Meetings • Information/perspective sharing • Ongoing activities by various institutions around MN. • Available data and resources. • Modeling frameworks. • Water implications of biofuel development in general. • Key knowledge/data gaps. • Discuss possible consensus building • Common methodological/modeling ground. • The current state and the future prospects of water implications of ethanol development.

  14. Our overall observation • Water use by biofuel conversion processes does not seem to be a major threat for MN water resource at the state-level. • At a local level, however, water use by biofuel plant can be a problem depending on the ground water availability and public water supply capacity of the area. • Broad range of cost-effective water conservation measures should be discussed in all areas of water use (not only in biofuel conversion processes). • Standardized data, model and analytical method to determine location-specific water availability will be helpful to site biofuel plants considering water availability.

More Related