460 likes | 637 Views
ESTATE PLAN BY DEFAULT-THE LAW OF INTESTATE SUCCESSION. SHARE OF INTESTATE’S SPOUSE. Under the Common Law Dower Curtesy Uniform Probate Code Iowa Probate Code. JANUS V. TARASEWICZ. Simultaneous Death. Problem #1, Page 85
E N D
SHARE OF INTESTATE’S SPOUSE • Under the Common Law • Dower • Curtesy • Uniform Probate Code • Iowa Probate Code
Simultaneous Death • Problem #1, Page 85 • Does the UPC 120 hour rule, solve the problem created by the “no sufficient evidence rule” of the UPC.
SHARES OF INTESTATE’S CHILDREN • SHARE OF CHILDREN • Uniform Probate Code • Iowa Code
SHARES OF INTESTATE’S MORE REMOTE DESCENDANTS(Grandchildren, great-grandchildren, etc. • CHILDREN vs. ISSUE (Descendants) • Immediate Offspring • More remote descendants • PER CAPITA DISTRIBUTION • PER STIRPES DISTRIBUTION
A’s Family Tree A B C D E
A’s Growing Family Tree A B C D E gb1 gb2 gb3
A’s More Growing Family Tree A B C D E gb1 gb2 gb3 gc
A’s More Growing Family Tree A B C D E gb1 gb2 gb3 gc gd1 gd2
A’s Whole Family Tree A B C D E gb1 gb2 gb3 gc gd1 gd2 ge
A’s Whole Family Tree A gb1 gb2 gb3 gc gd1 gd2 ge
A’s Family TreeChildren, Grandchildren and More Remote Descendants All issue survive: B, C and D take 1/3 each
A’s Family TreeChildren, Grandchildren and More Remote Descendants B, C and D predecease A In Iowa: E and F take 1/6 G, H and I take 1/9 J and K take 1/6 Under UPC: E through K take 1/7 each
A’s Family TreeChildren, Grandchildren and More Remote DescendantsB, C, D, F and J predecease A. Under the UPC: E, G, H, I and K take 1/7 M, N O and P take 1/14 (2/28) In Iowa: E takes 1/6 M, N and O take 1/18 G, H, and I take 1/9 J and K take 1/6
A’s Family TreeChildren, Grandchildren and More Remote Descendants B, C, F, G, H, I, J and K predecease A Under the UPC: E takes 1/3 M, N, O and P take 1/6 (2/12) In Iowa: E takes ¼ M, N and O take 1/12 P takes 1/2
Shares of Intestate’s Ancestors and Collaterals • Civil law consanquinity, page 92 • Parentelic method: • Parents • Their Descendants • Whole Blood • Half Blood
HALF-BLOOD INHERITANCE 1/2 1/2 F M SF A I B F and M have Child A and Child I M and F divorce or F dies. Then M marries SF; they have Child B I dies. A takes ½ from F, and ¼ from M B takes ¼ from M
Shares of Intestate’s Ancestors and Collaterals • Parents and their issue • Grandparents and their issue • Great-grandparents and their issue (Iowa but not UPC) • Issue of intestate’s deceased spouse • Collateral Relatives • The Iowa Early “Escheat” Rule
The Meaning of Children • Adopted Children • Legally Adopted • Equitable (virtual) adoption • Children born out-of-wedlock • Inheritance from mother • Inheritance from father
The Meaning of Children • Posthumous Children • Conceived before death • Coitus • Post-death implantation of embryo created before death with decedent’s egg or sperm • Conceived after death • Post-death conception using decedent’s sperm or egg • Post-death implantation of embryo created before death with decedent’s egg or sperm
Adopted Children • Take from adopting parents • Do not take from biological parents • Step-parent adoption exception
Step-Parent Adoption Exception Dad Mom Child
Step-Parent Adoption Exception Dad Mom Child
Step-Parent Adoption Exception Dad Mom Dad #2 Child
Step-Parent Adoption Exception Dad Mom Dad #2 Adoption Child
Step-Parent Adoption Exception Grandma Dad Mom Dad #2 Adoption Child
Adopted Children • For purposes of intestate succession • Under the will of: • The adopter • Third persons • E.g., T wills property to A for life, then to A’s children
New Reproductive Technologies • Children born to married persons with use of artificial insemination • Husband as donor • Stranger as donor • Surrogacy • Inheritance from contracting parents • Inheritance from biological parents • Inheritance from birth mother
Adopted Adults • For intestacy purposes • Under will of third party
O’Neal v. Wilkes • Facts, holding, and critique • Equitable (or virtual) adoption • Requirements • Promise to adopt • Holding out • Inheritance from: • Promisor • Others • “Adopted child”
Biological Child (Once known as Child-Born-Out-of-Wedlock or Illegitimate) • Inherit from Mother • And through • Inherit from Father • And through? • Proof issues: • Evidence proving paternity available during father’s lifetime • General and notorious recognition • Recognition in writing • Should there be a distinction? • Would a distinction be constitutional?
Posthumous Children • Children conceived before intestate’s death • Children conceived after intestate’s death • Massachusetts and New Jersey cases
Advancements • Common law rule • Purpose of rule • Creation of the hodgepot
Parent has $450,000 Parent gives $50,000 to Child A Parent dies with $400,000 and three children, A, B and C Court determines transfer to A was an advancement Hodgepot $400,000 (probate estate 50,000 (advancement $450,000 /3== $150,000 From $400,000 Probate Estate: A gets $100,000 and each of B and C gets $150,000
Advancements • Problems with the rule • Statutory solutions • UPC • Iowa Code • Problem, page 131
Bars to Succession • Homicide • Disclaimer
Homicide • Should slayer be barred? • If slayer should be barred, • Is slayer deemed to have predeceased victim? • Does slayer hold as constructive trustee? • In Re Estate of Mahoney
Homicide • Iowa Code 633.535 (1) • Effects of • Criminal conviction • Criminal acquittal
Disclaimer • Common law rules • Intestacy • Wills • Reasons to permit • Tax savings • Defeat creditors claims
Disclaimer • Statutory rules • Federal law I.R.C. 2518 • Iowa Code 633.704
Problem and Cases • Troy v. Hart • What are the facts of this case? • Was the disclaimer motivated by a desire to “swindle” Medicaid. • Was the disclaimer valid? • Can Medicaid get reimbursed? • Should Medicaid be reimbursed? • Problem, page 150