1 / 10

ReMi

ReMi. Team 5 Scott Mathot Lyndsay Hazelwood Ellen Hall-Patton. Arrays. 20 lines total 1-6 on West side of highway, following most visible fault trace 7-12 on East side of highway, where scarp was less apparent 13-20 perpendicular to the proposed fault. Lines 1-6. Lines 1-6. Line 7-12.

nico
Download Presentation

ReMi

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ReMi Team 5 Scott Mathot Lyndsay Hazelwood Ellen Hall-Patton

  2. Arrays • 20 lines total • 1-6 on West side of highway, following most visible fault trace • 7-12 on East side of highway, where scarp was less apparent • 13-20 perpendicular to the proposed fault

  3. Lines 1-6

  4. Lines 1-6

  5. Line 7-12

  6. Line 13-20

  7. Lines 13-20

  8. Results • Shear velocities at 30m depth change across the fault • Arrays on the Southwest side appear to show lower velocities than those on the NE side • Especially true when fault is visible on the surface • Differences in velocities become smaller the farther Southeast the arrays are set • Correlates with where fault becomes less apparent • Low velocity zone is apparent between the vegetation lineament and projected fault trace

  9. Limitations • Depth calculations allow for increased error as the angle of the dip of the layers departs from zero • Impossible to detect some geologic boundaries because of no field-measureable seismic shear-velocity contrast • Geophone placement and leveling • Inconsistency in picking pf plots

More Related