120 likes | 225 Views
The Effects of Mass Loss on the Evolution of Chemical Abundances in Fm Stars. Mathieu Vick 1,2 Georges Michaud 1 Département de physique, Université de Montréal, Canada GRAAL / UMR5024, Université Montpellier II, France. Pop.I, MS stars 7000 K <T eff < 10 000 K Non magnetic
E N D
The Effects of Mass Loss on the Evolution of Chemical Abundances in Fm Stars Mathieu Vick1,2 Georges Michaud1 Département de physique, Université de Montréal, Canada GRAAL / UMR5024, Université Montpellier II, France
Pop.I, MS stars 7000 K <Teff< 10 000 K Non magnetic Abundance anomalies => Slow rotators Binaries Typical abundance patterns underabundances : Li, CNO, Ca, Sc overabundances : Iron peak elements (2-5) Rare earths (10 or more) Fm’s are expected to have the same patterns Basic Physical Properties Gebran et al., 2007 (poster 05)
Michaud (1970): separation in radiative zone leads to observed abundance anomalies Anomalies predicted by purely diffusive models are larger than those observed Other processes? The Basic Model 1.4M: Diffusion only (black), mass loss (red, blue, green), turbulence (orange).
Competition between g and grad approx. determines movement of elements Position of BSCZ and g = grad (vdrift= 0) Large scale effects can hinder diffusion Diffusion time scales grow with increasing density Transport Processes Mass Loss
Richer et al (2000): Sirius A: 1 free parameter (mixed mass) 12 of 16 elements observed are well reproduced Other papers: Richard et al. (2001) Michaud et al. (2005) Models with Turbulence Can mass loss do the same?
Implementation of Mass Loss Physical considerations: 1.tdiff >> tconvHomogeneous abundances in CZ 2. Convective overshoot mixes the atmosphere and links H-He CZ (Latour et al. ,1981) The mass loss rates considered are: • chemically homogenous (with the same composition as the SCZ) • spherically symmetrical • weak enough not to influence nuclear burning in the core or the stellar structure
Implementation of Mass Loss • Can’t simply add to total velocity field (many numerical problems encountered) • But with simple hypotheses these problems can be avoided: (1) homogeneous CZ (2) Mass lost has same composition as SCZ • Mechanism is not important
Implementation of Mass Loss • where: In SCZ Under SCZ
Models with Mass Loss • The evolutionary calculations take into detailed account time-dependant abundance variations of 28 chemical species and include all effects of atomic diffusion and radiative accelerations. • These are the first fully self-consistent evolutionary models which include mass loss. • Models were calculated for 1.35, 1.40, 1.45 and 1.50 M. • All the models have evolved from the homogenous pre-main sequence phase with a solar metallicity (Z=0.02). • The mass loss rates considered varied from 1 x 10-14 to 3 x 10-13 Myr-1.
Observation: tUMa (Hui-Bon-Hoa, 2000) Age~500 Myr, Teff~7000 K Turbulence and mass loss have slightly different effect on certain elements Results: 1.5 M model Fe convection zone appears naturally!
Results (cont.) • Anomalies appear with decreasing importance down to stars of 1.35M. • Reasonable mass loss rates can reduce anomalies to the desired levels
Conclusions • With a mass loss rate of the order of the solar mass loss rate we can successfully reproduce the observed anomalies of tUMa. • It is shown that turbulence and mass loss affect anomalies differently. It is thus possible that additional observations (and more massive models) could help constrain the relative importance of each process. • Observations of elements between Al and Ar could allow us to determine if there is separation between the Fe and H-He convection zones. • In any case, it is seen that mass loss can effectively reduce the predicted anomalies to observed levels.