490 likes | 612 Views
Some New Perspectives on India’s Approach to Capital Account Liberalization. Eswar Prasad Cornell University. Benefits of Financial Integration: Theory. Efficient international allocation of capital Consumption smoothing via international risk sharing
E N D
Some New Perspectives on India’s Approach to Capital Account Liberalization Eswar Prasad Cornell University
Benefits of Financial Integration: Theory • Efficient international allocation of capital • Consumption smoothing via international risk sharing • Large welfare effects for developing economies
Growth Benefits of Financial Integration: Evidence About 25 studies of growth effects No effect 4 Mixed: 18 Positive: 3 No robust macroeconomic evidence of growth benefits
Correlation between Growth and Current A/c Balance Non-industrial Countries, 1970-2004
Volatility and Risk Sharing • No evidence that financial integration by itself is proximate determinant of financial crises • Developing economies, including emerging markets, have not attained better risk sharing
New Evidence: A Summary • Equity market liberalization seems to work • FDI benefits becoming more apparent • Benefits more evident in micro data
The Traditional View More efficient international allocation of capital Capital deepening International risk-sharing GDP growth Consumption volatility Financial Globalization
A Different Perspective Traditional Channels Potential Collateral Benefits Financial market development Institutional development Better governance Macroeconomic discipline GDP / TFP Growth Consumption volatility Financial Globalization
Complication: Threshold Effects GDP / TFP growth Risks of Crises Above Thresholds Threshold Conditions Financial market development Institutional Quality, Governance Macroeconomic policies Trade integration X Financial Globalization ? GDP / TFP growth Risks of Crises Below Thresholds
TENSION !! • Financial integration can catalyze financial development, improve governance, impose discipline on macro policies... • But, in the absence of a basic pre-existing level of these supporting conditions, financial integration can wreak havoc
Collateral Benefits Framework Could Help Make Progress • Unified conceptual framework • Country-specific requirements, initial conditions can be taken into account • Selective approach to liberalization based on prioritization of collateral benefits • Can manage risks during transition to thresholds, but can not eliminate them
Really New Evidence:Composition of External Liabilities Matters • FDI and portfolio equity liabilities improve risk sharing outcomes; Debt worsens risk sharing • FDI and portfolio equity liabilities boost TFP growth; Debt has negative impact • Negative effects of debt attenuated by deeper financial markets, better institutions • Level of financial integration itself is a threshold
Reality on the Ground • De facto financial openness increasing • Capital controls becoming less effective > Expansion of trade > Larger international financial flows > Rising sophistication of international investors • Trying to maintain rigid capital controls doesn’t solve inflows problem + creates distortionary costs
How Open is India’s Capital Account? • De jure capital account openness > Capital controls • De facto financial integration > Stocks of external assets, liabilities as ratio to GDP
Foreign Exchange Reserves: Flows and Stocks(in billions of U.S. dollars)
A Decomposition of the Recent Reserve Buildup (in billions of U.S. dollars)
Has the Benefit-Cost Tradeoff Improved? • Composition of inflows, stocks of external liabilities has become more favorable
Share of FDI and Portfolio Liabilities in Gross External Liabilities
Ratio of FDI + Portfolio Liabilities to Gross External Liabilities: Emerging Markets (1995)
Ratio of FDI + Portfolio Liabilities to Gross External Liabilities: Emerging Markets (2006)
Has the Benefit-Cost Tradeoff Improved? • Composition of inflows, stocks of external liabilities has become more favorable • High levels of foreign exchange reserves
International Investment Position (in billions of U.S. dollars)
Has the Benefit-Cost Tradeoff Improved? • Composition of inflows, stocks of external liabilities has become more favorable • High levels of foreign exchange reserves • Rising trade openness
Has the Benefit-Cost Tradeoff Improved? • Composition of inflows, stocks of external liabilities has become more favorable • High levels of foreign exchange reserves • Rising trade openness • Greater exchange rate flexibility
Has the Benefit-Cost Tradeoff Improved? • Composition of inflows, stocks of external liabilities has become more favorable • High levels of foreign exchange reserves • Rising trade openness • Greater exchange rate flexibility • Financial markets stronger (banking reforms) and broader (equity markets deep and liquid) • More international flows of capital, including by institutional investors who have longer-term horizons; new financial instruments
India’s Share of Gross Inflows to Emerging Markets and Other Developing Countries
India’s Share of Gross Outflows from Emerging Markets and Other Developing Countries
But … • May still be below threshold levels of financial, institutional development • Managed exchange rate; absence of singular focus of monetary policy on inflation objective • Surges in inflows create macro complications • Financial markets still have way to go: bond markets not working well, banking sector problems tied in with other aspects of government policy (fiscal) • Many imperfections in international financial markets: herding behavior; incomplete markets; risks in system harder to trace
Outstanding Stock of Market Stabilization Bonds(in billions of INR)
Implications • Best to actively manage process of capital account liberalization rather than fight the inevitable • Seize windows of opportunity when benefit-risk tradeoff improves; but coast is never completely clear. • Capital account liberalization not an end in itself; needs to be put in the context of a more complete policy/reform agenda
Chinas Foreign Exchange Reserves: (billions of U.S. dollars)
Growth Accounting for More Financially Open Economies (MFO) (1966-1985 and 1986-2005)
Growth Accounting for Less Financially Open Economies (LFO) (1966-1985 and 1986-2005)