490 likes | 633 Views
Islamic Approaches of Microfinancing. Lecture Plan. Session 1: Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) Financing Microenterprises: Islamic Alternatives Islamic MFIs Islamic MFIs Vs Conventional MFIs Session 2: Financing Microenterprises: Islamic Alternatives Islamic Banks
E N D
Lecture Plan • Session 1: • Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) • Financing Microenterprises: Islamic Alternatives • Islamic MFIs • Islamic MFIs Vs Conventional MFIs • Session 2: • Financing Microenterprises: Islamic Alternatives • Islamic Banks • Other Specialized Institution—Waqf-based MFI
Session 1 • Introduction • Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) • Islamic MFIs Vs Conventional MFIs • Assessment of Islamic MFIs • Conclusion
Introduction (1) • In the last 50 years, different development strategies have been used to resolve the problem of poverty • Most of these programs failed • “Microfinance” initiated in the mid-1970s appears to be the ‘new paradigm’ to eradicate poverty
Introduction (2) • Limited access to finance is key constraint to private sector growth • Investment on MSEs is even more difficult • The MSEs do not qualify to get funds from institutional sources (banks) • lack of collateral • too much risk • too costly
Economics of Microfinancing • Profit = Revenue – Costs • Revenue =Rate of return on funds invested • Costs = Finance Costs + Operating Costs • Operating Costs = Variable Costs (wages) + Fixed Costs (rent, utilities, etc.) • Variable Costs = Field Level Costs + Costs at the Head/regional/branch offices • Microfinancing • Revenue may be low due to credit risk • Costs are high due to large operating costs
Financing MSEs • Commercial financial intermediation not feasible • If the poor have to be financed, there is a need for social financial intermediation • Two ways to do so: • Linking Approach—Existing financial institutions can do it through specialized windows • Specialized institutions Approach—NGOs, non-profit organizations, etc. • Almost all of MFIs models are of the second type
Financing MSEs-Sustainability • Mitigating Credit Risk • Ensure repayment in the absence of acceptable physical collateral • Solving the Moral Hazard problem • Ensure funds not diverted and used for intended activity • Economic viability —keep costs to a minimum relative to income • Operating costs • Financing costs
Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) • MFIs are target-oriented (poverty-focused) financial institutions • Target group—micro and small enterprises (MSEs) • (Average financing in Bangladesh is below US$ 200 and in the US is US$ 1500) • Graduation from poverty -- the “Virtuous circle” • Low income credit investment more income more credit more investment more income
MFIs-Main Features • Interested individuals must form a group • Several Groups form a Center • Center has weekly meetings • An official from the MFI attends the meetings and all transactions take place in these meetings (bank goes to the people)
MFIs-Other Features • Small amount of funds given for microenterprises for 3months -1year • Capital and interest paid back in small weekly installments • Forced savings and insurance programs • Social Development Programs • behavioral, ethical, and social development
MFIs-Social Collateral • MFIs have devised a structure to resolve the collateral and risk problems of financing • No physical collateral required • The repayment of dues of a member in the group is the collective responsibility of the all the members in the group • If any one in the group defaults--all members become disqualified for credit • Peer-pressure works as social collateral
MFIs and Sustainability • Mitigating Credit Risk (CR) • CR mitigated by social collateral (group-based lending) • Solving Moral Hazard (MH) Problem • Cash given out can be used for other purposes –chances of default increases • Economic Viability • High administrative costs (some estimates show costs ranging from 24 to 400% of per dollar lent) • Reasonable finance costs Conventional MFIs have resolved the CR problem (social collateral), but not MH problem and Economic Viability problem
Islamic Alternatives to Microfinancing • Different alternatives: • Islamic MFIs • Islamic Banks • Specialized Institutions • Group-based microfinancing can be used (as it mitigates the CR)
Islamic MFIs-Features (1) • Islamic MFI retains the basic operational format of MFIs • Going to the Clients • Weekly/Monthly Repayments • A Social/Development Program (to fulfill the social role of Islamic finance) • IMFIs have some distinguishing features: • Sources of Funds • Other than external sources, can also use funds from zakah, awqaf, and other forms of charities • Use of funds (Mode of Financing) • Sale based and hiring modes (murabahah, salam, ijarah) • Profit-sharing modes (Musharakah and mudarabah)
Islamic MFIs-Features (2) • Amount transferred to the poorest • As Islamic modes are sale based the price of the asset is paid (no deductions are allowed) • Group Dynamics • Islamic values of brother/sister-hood improves cooperation among the group members • Financing the poorest • Zakat and other charities can supplement MFI activities (non-diversion of funds)
Islamic MFIs-Features (3) • Social Development Program • behavioral, ethical, and social aspects in light of Islamic teachings • Targeting the family through women • Spouse co-signs the contract • dealing with women more efficient and convenient • Women disseminate knowledge to children • Dealing with Arrears/Default • Less aggressive and use Islamic teachings to recover loans
Islamic MFIs and Sustainability • Mitigating Credit Risk (CR) • CR mitigated by social collateral (group-based lending) • Solving Moral Hazard (MH) Problem • As asset/good given instead of Cash, chances of diversion and default decreases • Economic Viability • High administrative costs • Reasonable finance costs Islamic MFIs can resolve the CR problem and the MH problem, but not the Economic Viability problem
Problems facing Islamic MFIs 1. Dilution in the Application of Islamic Modes of Financing • Main mode- murabahah or bai-muajjal. • It is difficult to go out with the clients and buy the goods/assets from faraway markets IMFIs delegates someone else (and inspects later) • Alternative is to use Profit-sharing modes • Problem is the moral hazard problem--No book-keeping and difficult to monitor
Problems facing Islamic MFIs 2. Lack of Funds • Most MFIs get their funds from external sources • Islamic MFIs have difficulty in getting funds from these sources • Operations and expansion of activities affected • Islamic MFIs have not yet tapped the sources of funds from Islamic institutions (like zakah, waqf, and other charities) 3. Training • Training can enhance efficiency but is costly
Conclusion • Islamic approach to microfinance has certain advantages • Diversified asset and liability structures • Social collateral stronger • Potential to target the poorest through complementary programs • Asset-based modes of financing can prevent diversion of funds for consumption • Lack of funds hampering its growth
Session 2 Financing Microenterprises: Islamic Approaches • Islamic Banks • Specialized institutions: Waqf-based MFI
Financing MSE by Islamic Banks (IBs) • The Rationale • Social Role –Islamic firms are not only about fulfilling Islamic contracts…there is more to it (social justice and benevolence) • Financing is the specialization of IBs—expand the client base to the MSEs • Can be done at no cost to the IB and more cost effectively than MFIs
Financing MSEs by IBs • Use the same format as MFIs (as it suits the MSEs) • IBs can open up a department for financing MSEs • Use the existing infrastructure (bank offices) for financing MSE operations
IBs & Economics of Microfinance • Profit = Revenue – Costs • Revenue =Rate of return on funds invested • Costs = Finance Costs + Operating Costs • Operating Costs = Variable Costs (wages) + Fixed Costs (rent, utilities, etc.) • Variable Costs = Field Level Costs + Costs at the Head/regional/branch offices
MFIs Vs. IBs: Operating Costs • MFIs • For any level of operations an MFI will maintain offices—Higher Fixed Costs • Higher Variable Costs (wages) at Head/regional/branch offices • IBs • No extra costs needed to maintain offices for the Microfinancing program (can use bank’s premises)—lower fixed costs • Lower Variable Costs (wages) at Head/regional/branch offices • Conclusion: Operation Costs to finance MSEs is lower in case of IBs compared to MFIs
MFIs Vs. IBs: Finance Costs • MFIs: Sources of funds • Main source –external funds (MFI has pay a rate of return, though subsidized in many cases) • No Deposits—Forced Savings of Members—Competitive returns are paid on savings • IBs: Sources of Funds • Deposits • Demand Deposits (no costs) • Investment Deposits (has to pay competitive returns to depositors) • Conclusion: Given the excess liquidity in IBs, the funds from Demand Deposits can be used for MSEs—Finance costs of IBs can be lower than that in MFIs
MFIs Vs. IBs: Quality of Service • Dependence on external funds in MFIs comes with conditionalities—IBs more flexible • Lack of funds in MFIs—poorer quality work force (especially at field level)—can increase the default rate • IBs pay competitive wages—good quality workers with higher productivity • Employees of IBs can be trained by the Bank at low cost—not possible in case of MFIs • Most IBs have funds collected from penalties for late payments—these funds can be used for complementary asset building/poverty reducing programs—asset building in form of grants or qard-hassan
IBs and Sustainability • Mitigating Credit Risk (CR) • CR mitigated by social collateral (group-based lending) • Solving Moral Hazard (MH) Problem • As asset/good given instead of Cash, chances of diversion and default decreases • Economic Viability • Low administrative costs • No need for a hierarchy of senior management and offices • Use existing branches for operation • Low finance costs • Excess liquidity—use liquid funds available IBs appear to resolve all the problems related to sustainability in microfinancing.
IB and Microfinancing: An Example • Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd (IBBL) has a Rural Development Program (RDS) to finance MSEs • Started in 1996 and funded from IBBLs general investment fund • As of October 2006, RDS operated from 116 branches (of 176 total), covering 7,788 villages giving a total of Tk. 8589.7 mill. to 368,360 clients • The recovery rate is 99 percent. • Employees involved with RDS have better benefit packages than other MFIs • Employees get in-house training at IBBL Training Academy
RDS of IBBL • Loan amount (Tk. 3000 to Tk. 25000) • Paid back in weekly installments • No physical collateral required • Group-based lending • Rate of return charged is 10 percent with 2.5% rebate for timely payment (other MFIs rate range from 16 to 20 %)
Microfinancing by Specialized Institutions 1. Cash Waqf—waqf established in the form of cash • Can be used for microfinancing 2. Qardhassan bank—nonprofit financial intermediary • Capital would be cash waqf • Will receive current accounts • Provide qardhassan (interest free loans) for microfinancing 3. MFI based on Awqaf and Zakat • Returns from waqf given for investment purposes and zakat funds for consumption purposes Use the same operational format as MFIs (as it suits the MSEs)
Waqf-based MFIs • Historically, waqf based institutions did provide loans to the disadvantaged (Turkey and Iran) • W-MFI will retain the basic operational format of MFIs, but will have some distinguishing features • Group-based microfinancing can be used (as it mitigates the CR)
W-MFI: Sources and Uses of Funds • Sources of Funds • Obtain funds from Waqf and other sources (waqf certificates, qard hasan deposits, etc.) • Use of funds (Mode of Financing) • Qard (loan at service charges) • Sale based and hiring modes (murabahah, salam, ijarah) • Profit-sharing modes (Musharakah and mudarabah)
Special features of W-MFI • Liability • Waqf—the corpus (endowment) has to be intact • Savings deposits — mudarabah contracts • Loss of lower return can lead to withdrawal risks • Assets • Allocation of assets into fixed income and microfinancing activities
WMFI – Nature of waqf and investment options • Waqf—the requirement of keeping the corpus intact • Simplest-option—Invest the waqf endowment in some safe fixed-income asset and use the returns for MF operations • The scope of MF will be limited
Example Waqf of $10 million, rate of return 5%, financing $100 per beneficiary (Grameen Bank 5.5 million beneficiaries given $5 billion)
Allocation of Assets • Risk and returns depend on allocation funds into different assets • Fixed income (FI) assets—low-return low-risk assets • Microfinancing—higher returns with higher risks • Invest in FI assets so that returns can cover expected losses from microfinancing • In addition, build various reserves to cover various risks
Risk-reducing reserves • Takaful reserves • Contributed by beneficiaries • Used in case of default due to unexpected reasons • Profit-equalizing reserves • Contributed by depositors • Used to maintain competitive returns • Economic capital reserves • Contributed from the surplus of MFI (no dividend distribution) • Used in case of negative shock
Other funding sources • Funds from Zakah and other charities • Funds from waqf given for investment purposes and zakah funds for consumption purposes
W-MFI & Sustainability • Mitigating Credit Risk (CR) • CR mitigated by social collateral (group-based lending) • Solving Moral Hazard (MH) Problem • As asset/good given instead of Cash, chances of diversion and default decreases • Economic Viability • High administrative costs • Low finance costs • Being charities there are no finance charges These specialized institutions resolve CR and MH problems and to lesser extent the viability problem
Conclusion • There are strong economic reasons for establishing Islamic alternatives to poverty-focused microfinancing. • Financing should adopt operational mechanisms of MFIs (as they suit these clients) • Financing MSEs by IBs is most efficient (cost effective)—given the social responsibility and excess liquidity in IBs, financing MSEs should be undertaken • Traditional institutions of waqf, zakat, and qard hassan are important means of financing MSEs during contemporary times—should be integrated with microfinancing