1 / 17

DRAGON Score

DRAGON Score. Strbian , D, et al Predicting outcome of IV thrombolysis treated ischemic stroke patients . The DRAGON score. Neurology 2012;78:427–432. Introducción. Rha , J, et al. The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2007;38:967–973.

nikki
Download Presentation

DRAGON Score

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DRAGON Score Strbian, D, et alPredicting outcome of IV thrombolysistreatedischemicstrokepatients. TheDRAGON score. Neurology2012;78:427–432

  2. Introducción Rha, J, et al. The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2007;38:967–973.

  3. Introducción Rha, J, et al. The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2007;38:967–973.

  4. Introducción Glucosa CT • Reoclusión • Recanalización con Perfusión Insuficiente • Recanalización con hemorragia • Recanalización con Territorio previamente • dañado Resultado Final Bueno Resultado Final Con Cx Meretoja, A. et al. Off-labelthrombolysisis not associated with poor outcome in patients with stroke. Stroke 2010;41:1450 –1458.

  5. Justificación

  6. D – ACM HiperDensa R – mRS (Escala de Rankin Modificada) A – Age(Edad) G – Glucemia O – On set totreatment(tiempo de inicio a Tratamiento) N – NIHSS (Escala de Stroke de los Institutos Nacionales de Salud)

  7. D 1.- Signo de arteria Cerebral Media hiperDensa 2.- OtroscambiosTempranos TC: Pérdida de diferenciaciónCortezasustancia Blanca Hipodensidad de GB Atenuación Insular Puntaje: Ambos =2 Cualquiera=1 Ninguno=0

  8. R • Escala de Rankin modificada • Puntajeprevio>1 = 1

  9. A – Age Edad >80 Años = 2 65 –79 Años = 1 < 65 Años = 0

  10. G - Glucosa • Niveles séricos de glucosa al ingreso • > 144 mg/dL = 1

  11. O – Onset Time Tiempo > 90 minutos = 1

  12. N – NIHSS >15 =3 10–15 =2 5–9 =1 0–4 =0

  13. Strbian, D, et alPredicting outcome of IV thrombolysistreatedischemicstrokepatients. TheDRAGON score. Neurology2012;78:427–432

  14. Proporción de pacientes con resultado favorable Strbian, D, et alPredicting outcome of IV thrombolysistreatedischemicstrokepatients. TheDRAGON score. Neurology2012;78:427–432

  15. Strbian, D, et alPredicting outcome of IV thrombolysistreatedischemicstrokepatients. TheDRAGON score. Neurology2012;78:427–432

  16. Auc = .84 • [0.5, 6] = Test malo. • [0.6, 0.75] = Test regular. • [0.75, 0.9] = Test bueno. • [0.9, 0.97] = Test muybueno. • [0.97, 1] = Test excelente. ZouK, et al. Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models. Circulation, 6;115(5):654-7.

More Related