1 / 7

Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Networks

Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Networks. draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-01.txt. Greg Bernstein Grotto Networking Young Lee Huawei Sugang Xu NICT Hiroaki Harai NICT Daniel King Old Dog Consulting Giovanni Martinelli Cisco. Updates 00->01.

nikkos
Download Presentation

Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Signaling Extensions for Wavelength Switched Networks draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-signaling-01.txt Greg Bernstein Grotto Networking Young Lee Huawei Sugang Xu NICT Hiroaki Harai NICT Daniel King Old Dog Consulting Giovanni Martinelli Cisco 80th IETF Prague (CZ)

  2. Updates 00->01 • Section 4: encoding aligned with info model • Section 5: Bi-directionality • Section 6: DWA, reconciled with bidirectionality 80th IETF Prague (CZ)

  3. WSON Attributes • WSON specific information within a dedicated LSP_ATTRIBUTE: • FEC encoding • Modulation Format • Regen processing configuration • No specific TSPEC update for WSON 80th IETF Prague (CZ)

  4. Bidirectionality • Need WG comments on possible options. • Output from RWA process: a path and a Label Set. • Possible Options in signaling function • Option1: current, bidir LSP (Label_Set + Upstream_Label) • Option2: bidir LSP (Label_Set or Label_Set + some extension to Upstream_Label) • Option3: two unidirectional LSPs (associated?) 80th IETF Prague (CZ)

  5. Opt 1 and 2: Bidirectional LSP • Option 1 Path(LS+UL) Several Path Attempt required PathErr (AcceptableLabelSet) Egress Egress Interm Interm Ingress Ingress Path(LS’+UL’) Resv • Option 2 ONE Path Attempt required Path(LS, or LS+UL set) Resv 80th IETF Prague (CZ)

  6. Option 3 • Two unidirectional LSP. • Worth considering association (e.g. draft-zhang-mpls-tp-rsvpte-ext-associated-lsp-03). • Pros: • Simple independent signaling. • Transport environment may need independent oam. • Each LSP for map a physical resource: a wavelenght • Cons: • Bigger State to maintains 80th IETF Prague (CZ)

  7. Next Steps • Updates according to WSON info model and encoding draft • Bi-directionality decision 80th IETF Prague (CZ)

More Related