1 / 9

Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON)

Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON). draft-bernstein-ccamp-wavelength-switched-02.txt. Greg Bernstein gregb@grotto-networking.com Grotto Networking Young Lee ylee@huawei.com Huawei Wataru Imajuku imajuku.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp NTT.

ophrah
Download Presentation

Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks (WSON)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of Wavelength Switched Optical Networks(WSON) draft-bernstein-ccamp-wavelength-switched-02.txt Greg Bernstein gregb@grotto-networking.com Grotto Networking Young Lee ylee@huawei.com Huawei Wataru Imajuku imajuku.wataru@lab.ntt.co.jp NTT 70th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007

  2. Authors/Contributors • Snigdho Bardalai (Fujitsu) • Greg Bernstein (Grotto Networking) • Diego Caviglia (Ericsson) • Wataru Imajuku (NTT) • Daniel King (Aria Networks) • Young Lee (Huawei) • Dan Li (Huawei) • Itaru Nishioka (NEC Corp.) • Lyndon Ong (Ciena) • Jonathan Sadler (Tellabs) 70th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007

  3. WSON Framework • Describes wavelength switched optical networks (WSON), subsystems and associated processes. Emphasizing those aspects that are different from other technologies that utilize a GMPLS control plane. • Optical impairments are not currently considered in any depth since different approaches to impairments are used in different WSONs. • Summarize implications to GMPLS routing and signaling, and to PCE protocols. 70th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007

  4. WSON Subsystem Models • WDM links • Channel spacing, usable wavelengths, filter constraints • Laser Transmitter/Modulator • Tunability, tuning range, tuning time, (to come “line width”) • Spectral characteristics (modulation type), clock rate, FEC type • ROADMs, FOADMs, and OXCs (oh, my!) • Some of the most popular WSON switching elements are extremely asymmetric. We must have a description of this as an input to path computation. • Wavelength Converters and Regenerators • Technology, ranges, constraints on signal type (1R, 2R, & 3R) 70th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007

  5. ROADM Example Ports #3-42 drop • Constraints • Any to Any connectivity is NOT supported! • Example: ingress ports 3-42 (adds) can only egress on port #1 • Various wavelength restrictions can apply to drop ports (colored or colorless, single wavelength or multiple wavelengths) add … … line line 2-Degree ROADM Port #1 Port #2 … … add drop Ports #43-82 70th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007

  6. Routing and Wavelength Assignment (RWA) • WSONs with limited or no wavelength converters must perform RWA • Known hard problem (NP complete) • Two basic approaches: combined RWA and two step routing followed by wavelength assignment. • RWA approaches lead to different computational architectures • Combined RWA on a PCE • Routing and WA on separate PCEs • Routing with distributed WA via Signaling 70th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007

  7. Implications for GMPLS Signaling • General • Want to be able to describe wavelengths and signals in a unified fashion  Tomohiro’s wavelength label draft is a good start. • Distributed Wavelength Assignment • Takes “pressure” off of routing for bandwidth updates puts it on signaling. • Problem with bi-directional distributed WA  Sugang’s draft proposes a solution. 70th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007

  8. Implications for Routing • Different RWA computational Architectures require differing amounts of information via routing • In general all would need ROADM/FOADM/OXC connectivity information • PCE based WA (as opposed to distributed WA via signaling) requires wavelength constraint and availability information 70th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007

  9. Next Steps • Adopt WSON-Framework as a Working Group document in order to guide the development of various solution drafts for signaling, routing and PCE applied to WSONs. • Continue to refine as issues are discovered and solutions are finalized. 70th IETF – Vancouver, December 2007

More Related