1 / 39

Southeast Maricopa / Northern Pinal County Transportation Study

Southeast Maricopa / Northern Pinal County Transportation Study. Public Meeting March 17, 2003. Regional Context. Study Area Boundaries. Model Area. Focus Area. Study Focus Area. Population & Employment Growth. 2002 Network: Number of Lanes. 2000 Link V/C. 2000 Intersection LOS.

nikkos
Download Presentation

Southeast Maricopa / Northern Pinal County Transportation Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Southeast Maricopa / Northern Pinal County Transportation Study Public Meeting March 17, 2003

  2. Regional Context

  3. Study Area Boundaries Model Area Focus Area

  4. Study Focus Area

  5. Population & Employment Growth

  6. 2002 Network: Number of Lanes

  7. 2000 Link V/C

  8. 2000 Intersection LOS

  9. 2002 Network Summary Maricopa County Pinal County

  10. Future Base: Added Roadways • 385 miles of new arterial • 22 miles of new freeway • Cost = $1,155 million

  11. Future Base: Widened Roadways • 586 miles of widened arterials • Cost = $2,637 million

  12. Base/2030 Intersection LOS

  13. Future Base Network: Number of Lanes

  14. Future Base Network Summary Maricopa County Pinal County

  15. Example Arterials Arizona Ave Ironwood Rd Gilbert Rd Elliot Rd Higley Rd Queen Creek Rd Power Rd Riggs Rd Ellsworth Rd Features to Consider Widening Express Bus Service Variable Message Signs Bus Priority Signal Coordination HOV Lanes Major Intersection Improvement Arterial Improvement Program

  16. Widened State Highways • 35 miles of highway widening • Cost = $123 million

  17. Widened Freeways • 42 miles of freeway widening, cost = $336 million • 38 miles of HOV cost = $228 million • 8 New/Modified Interchanges • cost = $74 million

  18. Enhanced 2030 Intersection LOS

  19. Enhanced Network Summary Maricopa County Pinal County

  20. Williams Gateway Freeway Concept • Projected Daily Volumes • Loop 202 to N/S Corridor = 60,000 to 100,000 • N/S Corridor to US 60 = 5,000 • Cost = $750 million

  21. Price Freeway Extension Concept • Projected Daily Volume = 96,000 to 140,000 • Cost = $390 million

  22. US 60 Freeway Extension Concept • Projected Daily Volume = 35,000 to 65,000 • Cost = $117 million

  23. East Valley Corridor Concept • Projected Daily Volumes • I-10 to Higley = 84,000 to 110,000 • Higley to N/S Corridor = 63,000 to 84,000 • N/S Corridor to US 60 = 14,000 to 21,000 • Cost = $1,390 million

  24. Apache Junction – Coolidge Corridor Concept • Projected Daily Volumes • US 60 to E/W Corridor = 60,000 to 88,000 • E/W Corridor to SR 287 = 55,000 to 110,000 • SR 287 to I-10 = 26,000 to 45,000 • Cost = $1,640 million

  25. Summary of New Corridor Concepts • Cost = $4,287 million

  26. New 2030 Intersection LOS

  27. New Facilities Network Summary Maricopa County Pinal County

  28. 2030 Operational Comparisons Maricopa County Pinal County

  29. Local Network & Rural Transit Access

  30. Proposed Regional Connections

  31. Transit Service-Maricopa • Expanded Fixed Route Service • Regional Service • Main St Chandler Blvd. • Southern Ave Germann Rd. • US 60 Power Rd. • Loop 101 Gilbert Rd. • Country Club Dr/Arizona Ave • 5 New Park and Ride • 2 New Transit Centers

  32. Transit Service-Pinal • Expanded Fixed Route Service • Extend Maricopa County Service to Apache Junction • Intra-county Service • Within Individual cities • Express/Commuter Inter-city Service

  33. Draft Network

  34. High Capacity Corridor Cost • UP Mainline Chandler • LRT - $461 million • BRT - $226 million • Chandler Boulevard • LRT - $684 million • BRT - $306 million • Power Road • LRT - $465 million • BRT - $237 million • Main Street • LRT - $374 million • BRT - $185 million • UP Southeast • Commuter rail - $567 million

  35. Non-Motorized System Gaps

  36. Non-motorized System • Eliminate Existing Gaps • Expand Trail System • Provide On-street Bike Lanes with Arterial Construction/Widening

  37. Arterial & Highway Priorities • New • Independent of Other Components • Constructed with New Development • Widening • Occurs as Segments Approach LOS D/E • Bottleneck, Continuity, Safety Considerations

  38. Freeway Priorities • Widening • Higher Priority than New Corridors • Phased Based on Demand • Benefit of HOV Lane • New • Incorporate in Local Plans • Preserve Right of Way • Williams Gateway Freeway • US 60 Freeway Extension • Price Freeway Extension • Apache Junction/Coolidge Corridor • East Valley Corridor

  39. Transit Priorities • Fixed Route • Increase Service to Satisfy Growth • Expand with New Development to Meet Density Thresholds • Regional Service • Compliment Fixed Route Service • Serve Medium Distance Trips • High Capacity Facilities • Connect Activity Centers • Serve Long Distance Trips

More Related