1 / 14

Trends in ccTLD’s and models of operation

Trends in ccTLD’s and models of operation. Oscar Robles Chairman of the Board Latin American and Caribbean ccTLDs Kuala Lumpur 23.07.2004. Contents. LACTLD origins Composition of LACTLD Two Core Functions…Two Main Clients How To Deal With? Conclusions. LACTLD origins.

nile
Download Presentation

Trends in ccTLD’s and models of operation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Trends in ccTLD’s and models of operation Oscar Robles Chairman of the Board Latin American and Caribbean ccTLDs Kuala Lumpur 23.07.2004

  2. Contents • LACTLD origins • Composition of LACTLD • Two Core Functions…Two Main Clients • How To Deal With? • Conclusions

  3. LACTLD origins • It was 1998, and the Internet Forum for the White Paper meeting was held in Buenos Aires. • Born in Buenos Aires, Argentina as a communication and information exchange forum for the LAC ccTLDs. • Legally incorporated as a not for profit international organization in the República Oriental del Uruguay in 2004. • Started with thirteen members, now seventeen.

  4. Composition of LACTLD • Current Members: bo, br, cl, co, cr, cu, do, gt, hn, mx, ni, pa, pe, py, sv, uy • Different Structures • .cl; .co.cr; com.br; web.ve • Different Organizations • By the government: .ar • With direct government involvement: .br, .cr, .cu, .bo • By academical/research institutions: .cl, .co, .do, .gt, .mx, .ni, .pa, .pe, .sv, .uy • By ONG’s: .hn • More than 1.4 million domain names.

  5. Two Core Functions… • Domain name registrations under the ccTLD • Customer Service / Help Desk • Registration and Maintenance procedings • Payment procedings • Information and Communication procedings • Physical Infraestructure to offer service • Databases • Policies for domain name registration • Policies for domain name dispute resolution

  6. Two Core Functions… • Domain name resolution services under the ccTLD. • To establish the appropriate technical infrastructure to support the service • Management of the infrastructure • Highly critic service to attend in a precisely basis… always and serveral million-times a day!.

  7. …Two Main Clients • Local Internet Community (LIC) • Direct clients • Industry • Government • Global Internet Community (GIC) • ICANN/IANA • RIRs • TLDs • IETF

  8. How To Deal With? • Attending the global (mostly technical) resolutions to ensure the interoperability of our services. • RFC: Request For Comments. Since April 1969. Almost 4 thousand documents released. • RFC 1591: Domain Name System Structure and Delegation.

  9. How to Deal with? • Why? • In order to keep updated the level of services in a ccTLD • Environment of competition • Many choices for end users

  10. End User Services Bandwidth, Hardware, Software, Data Bases, R&I. Attending LIC and GIC needs keeping interoperability Technological Infrastructure Certainity and Stability Stability in the organization manager of the ccTLD and support from the LIC. How To Deal With?

  11. gTLDs: ICANN (GIC) .com .net .org .info .biz .name .pro .museum .coop .aero Global Internet Community (GIC) How To Deal With? ccTLDs (LIC) ccTLDs: ICANN (GIC) .ar .br .cl .co .fr .jp .mx .uk .us .uy … Local Internet Community (LIC) Global Internet Community (GIC) GIC

  12. Conclusions • One Key Success Factor of the Internet is INTEROPERABILITY! • Internet can NOT allow isolation! • The ccTLDs must follow the technical standars defined by consensus in organizations like: • IETF(Internet Engineering Task Force). • ICANN(Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers).

  13. Conclusions • The internet resources management requires the governments participation • Governments should jump into this positive inertia through the Government Advisory Committee (GAC) of ICANN. • This is the only way to ensure the most fundamental for the Internet users in the world: Stability and Interoperability.

  14. Trends in ccTLD’s and models of operation Oscar Robles Chairman of the Board Latin American and Caribbean ccTLDs Kuala Lumpur 23.07.2004

More Related