260 likes | 387 Views
Development of the EAFI (Ethical Aquaculture Food Index); a Sustainability Decision Support Tool for SE Asia. Professor Jason Weeks, Dr F rancis Murray, Professor David Little. SEAT Project. EC funded project 2009 - 2013 Focus on Asian aquaculture species exported to Europe
E N D
Development of the EAFI (Ethical Aquaculture Food Index); a Sustainability Decision Support Tool for SE Asia Professor Jason Weeks, Dr Francis Murray, Professor David Little
SEAT Project • EC funded project 2009 - 2013 • Focus on Asian aquaculture species exported to Europe • Creating evidence base that support sustainability standards and policy • Develop the EAFI as a tool for decision makers Asia Europe
Project Scope • 4 species from 4 countries • Particular focus on the main export species from each country • Whole value chain approach, looking beyond the farm
What is the EAFI Ethical Aquaculture Food Index
Selected EAFI Case Studies • SEAT’s 4 countries and 4 species present 48 different scenarios. • SEAT project will present 4 specific case studies in detail • Pangasius Vietnam • Shrimp Thailand • Shrimp China • Shrimp and Prawn Bangladesh
What is the EAFI • Evidence based decision support tool primarily for international seafood buyers and certifiers • Incorporates environmental, economic, social and ethical data • Assesses and scores the sustainability of an aquaculture commodity, beyond the farm level • Specific to the 4 SEAT countries
What is the EAFI • SEAT work packages generated data and identified species and country specific indicators • Indicators developed into a tiered, hierarchical, iterative framework • Simple tool, becoming more complex only where necessary • Utilises a weight of evidence approach to make decisions
Value chain landscape Tier 0 – simple assessment of the national value chain landscape EAFI ? Decision making Tier One – qualitative assessment of landscape by questions EAFI ? Tier Two More questions leading to semi-quantitative decisions EAFI ? Tier 3 More questions leading to more quantitative decisions EAFI ? Key Features of the EAFI as a tiered iterative hierarchical framework Decision point at each tier
How do I use the EAFI? • Step through from Tier 0 • Decision point at each tier. You can exit at any tier if available information is specific and you can satisfy the indicator/ answer the question • If moving to more quantitative and specific tiers then EAFI facilitates improvements in knowledge and techniques
The value chain landscape (Tier 0) - product Community? Disease? Ethics? Feed in? Welfare? Product quality? Chemicals out? Chemicals in? Processing? Nutrients in? Nutrients out?
Types of questions • All questions within the framework have a graduated range of answers or indicator of sustainability. • Significant use of the actual project data collected and used via an interrogational approach • Links to all models ERA Aqua, nutrient, GIS, LCA etc. within the framework; toolbox approach • Development of bias and weighting towards ethics and sustainability • Mixture of detailed and yes/ no questions dependent on tier – different questions with greater complexity of answers at higher tiers.
How is the EAFI weighted? • Currently under development (expect finished product - November 2013) • Biased towards ethical/ sustainable values of producers and European consumers • Undergoing Delphi process as we speak – three iterations of testing with end users
“The maths bit” • Normalisation • Aggregation • Monte Carlo simulation • Bootstrapping • Weighting
Feedback to date • A range of aquaculture standards setters/ certifiers have been consulted and been positive about the EAFI potential and the (risk) framework approach • Buyers also tested; main comment is to keep it as simple as possible • All have liked very much the inclusion of ethics and the whole value chain approach into the EAFI process
Summary • Independent iterative process that is evidence based and focussed on ethics and sustainability • Easy to use by non experts • Not an accreditation scheme but a first consideration Next steps..... • Now encouraging feedback on how you would use the EAFI • Development of EAFI is moving toward worked case studies, weighting, and refined presentation of robust database.
Thank you • Jason Weeks (EAFI development) J.weeks@cranfield.co.uk