1 / 7

The LAW Challenge

The LAW Challenge. Special Session at LAW VI, 2012 . The LAW Challenge. Sponsored by US National Science Foundation (IIS 0948101 Content of Linguistic Annotation: Standards and Practices (CLASP) ) ACL Special Interest Group on Annotation (ACL SIGANN ) Goals

niles
Download Presentation

The LAW Challenge

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The LAW Challenge Special Session at LAW VI, 2012

  2. The LAW Challenge • Sponsored by • US National Science Foundation (IIS 0948101 Content of Linguistic Annotation: Standards and Practices (CLASP)) • ACL Special Interest Group on Annotation (ACL SIGANN) • Goals • Promote the use and collaborative development of open, shared resources • Identify and promote best practices for annotation interoperability

  3. Call Call for papers describing original, innovative projects involving linguistic annotations that reflect the state-of-the-art in best practice for annotation development, creation, and/or use Submissions evaluated by members of the LAW program committee Winner receives up to US $2500 to cover the author's (or authors') travel expenses

  4. Evaluation Criteria innovative use of linguistic information from different annotation layers demonstrable interoperability with at least one other annotation scheme or format developed by others quality of the annotated resource in terms of scheme design, documentation, tool support, etc. open availability of developed resources for community use usability and reusability of the annotation scheme or annotated resource outstanding contribution to the development of annotation best practices

  5. Winner Who Did What to Whom? A Contrastive Study of Syntacto-Semantic Dependencies Angelina Ivanova, Stephan Oepen, LiljaÖvrelidand Dan Flickinger • Main criteria for selection • design and focus on interoperability • potential to promote work on interoperability that will help the community to develop larger, richer representations to train various linguistic tools

  6. Runner-Up • A tough decision, close call for winner • Recognition for a strong runner-up Prague Markup Language Framework JirkaHana and Jan \v{S}tƒõp\'{a}nek

  7. Congratulations! …to both sets of authors Another LAW Challenge next year

More Related