1 / 28

Biomass and Coal Characteristics: Implications for Cofiring

Biomass and Coal Characteristics: Implications for Cofiring. David A. Tillman Foster Wheeler Power Group, Inc. Clinton, NJ . Abstract. Fuel Characterization Research at The Energy Institute of Pennsylvania State University Proximate and Ultimate Analysis

nina-lawrence
Download Presentation

Biomass and Coal Characteristics: Implications for Cofiring

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Biomass and Coal Characteristics: Implications for Cofiring David A. Tillman Foster Wheeler Power Group, Inc. Clinton, NJ 

  2. Abstract

  3. Fuel Characterization Research at The Energy Institute of Pennsylvania State University Proximate and Ultimate Analysis Drop Tube Reactor Testing (400 – 1700oC) Determine maximum volatile release Determine fuel reactivity Determine nitrogen and carbon volatile release 13C NMR Testing Develop Relationships to Full Scale Cofiring Testing Basis of the Analysis

  4. Nitrogen Evolution from Solid Fuels Governs NOx Formation from Fuel Nitrogen NOx Control is Favored by Volatile Nitrogen NOx Control is Favored by Nitrogen Rapidly Evolving from the Fuel Mass Understanding Nitrogen Evolution Patterns can Assist in Explaining NOx Reduction with Biomass and Low Rank Coals Understanding Nitrogen Evolution Patterns for a Given Suite of Fuels can Influence Fuel Selection Focus of the PSU Research

  5. USDOE – NETL and USDOE – EERE in Sponsoring Biomass Cofiring Technology Assessment USDOE – NETL, USDOE – EERE, and EPRI in Sponsoring Cofiring Research and Demonstration Projects with a Variety of Coals in Cyclone and PC Boilers Albright Station, Willow Island Station Bailly Station, Michigan City Station Seward Station, Shawville Station Allen Fossil Plant, Colbert Fossil Plant Support for this Research

  6. Baxter et. al., 1995. Seminal Paper on Nitrogen Evolution from Coals as a Function of Residence Time Research for USDOE and EPRI, Sponsored by USDOE and Performed by The Energy Institute of Pennsylvania State University and by Foster Wheeler Power Group, Inc. Background: Previous Studies

  7. Select Representative Biomass Fuels Sawdust Urban Wood Waste Fresh Switchgrass Weathered Switchgrass Basis of Selection Commonly used in cofiring applications Represent woody and herbaceous biomass Select Reference Coals Black Thunder [PRB] Pittsburgh #8 Methodology - 1

  8. Sawdust source: West Virginia [Willow Island Cofiring Project] Urban Wood Waste source: produced from a blend of plywood, particleboard, and paneling to be highly similar to the urban wood waste at Bailly Generating Station, with particular attention to nitrogen content Weathered Switchgrass source: Gadsden, Alabama [Southern Co. and Southern Research Institute Cofiring Project] Fresh Switchgrass source: Southern Co. and Auburn University Methodology - 2

  9. Characterize the Incoming Fuel Proximate and Ultimate Analysis Heating Value Air Dry and Grind Fuel Pyrolyze Fuel in Drop Tube Reactor (DTR) 400oC – 1700oC Argon Environment Determine Distribution of Nitrogen in Incoming Fuel (volatile N vs char N) Determine Nitrogen, Carbon, and Total Volatile Evolution as a Function of Temperature Methodology - 3

  10. Basic Premise: If nitrogen is in volatile form, and if nitrogen volatiles evolve more rapidly than carbon volatiles or total volatile matter, then NOx formation is more easily controlled by combustion mechanisms If nitrogen is in char form, or if nitrogen volatile evolution lags behind carbon volatile evolution or total volatile evolution, then NOx formation control by combustion mechanisms is more difficult and less effective Methodology - 4

  11. Analysis of Biomass Fuels

  12. Distribution of Fuel Nitrogen

  13. Maximum Volatile Nitrogen Yield

  14. Sawdust Nitrogen and Carbon Volatile Yields

  15. Sawdust Nitrogen and Carbon Evolution Normalized to Total Volatile Matter Evolution

  16. Nitrogen and Carbon Volatile Evolution from Urban Wood Waste

  17. Nitrogen and Carbon Volatile Evolution from Fresh Switchgrass

  18. Nitrogen and Carbon Volatile Evolution from Weathered Switchgrass

  19. Nitrogen and Carbon Volatile Evolution from Weathered Switchgrass Normalized to Total Volatile Evolution

  20. Nitrogen and Carbon Evolution from Black Thunder PRB Coal

  21. Nitrogen and Carbon Volatile Evolution from Pittsburgh #8 Coal

  22. Nitrogen and Carbon Volatile Evolution from Pittsburgh #8 Coal Normalized to Total Volatile Yield

  23. Nitrogen/Carbon Atomic Ratios in Char Normalized to N/C Ratio in Initial Fuel

  24. NOx Reductions at Albright

  25. NOx = 0.361 – 0.0043(Cm) + 0.022(EO2) – 0.00055(SOFA) Definitions: Cm is cofiring percentage, mass basis [0 – 10] EO2 is excess O2 at furnace exit (wet basis) [1 – 4] SOFA is separated overfire air damper positions for all 3 levels [0 – 240] r2 = 0.87, 68 observations Probabilities of random occurrence: equation, 4.2x10-28; intercept, 2.3x10-24; Cm, 1.2x10-5; EO2, 5.9x10-4; SOFA, 5.0x10-22 NOx Reductions at Albright (2)

  26. NOx Reduction at Seward Station

  27. NOx Reduction at all EPRI Demos

  28. Fuel reactivity is a key to NOx control using staged combustion Biomass fuels, in general, are highly reactive although weathering reduces nitrogen reactivity in switchgrass The relative reactivity of biomass, and various coals, can be used as a technique to evaluate potential in NOx management The DTR technique for analyzing fuels has significant benefits in evaluating initial combustion processes applied to NOx management Conclusions

More Related