ENCM 515 Review talk on 2001 Final

1. ENCM 515 Review talk on 2001 Final A. Wong, Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Calgary, Canadawona @ ucalgary.ca

2. To Be Tackled Today • Review Important concepts of DSP • 2001 ENCM 515 Final Exam • Question 1 • Question 2

3. Disclaimer • The answers given in this presentation are the views of the presenter and not necessarily the answers accepted by Dr. Smith

4. Requirements for “perfect” DSP architecture - 1 • Fast instruction cycle -- not clock speed • Fast hardware multiplier • Floating point for easier design -- avoids scaling and overflow • High precision • wide busses for register, memory, processing units • Fast loop operation

5. Requirements for “perfect” DSP architecture - 2 • Several data buses available to reduce memory bus conflict/transfer overhead • Harvard architecture and/or instruction caches to avoid instruction and data-fetch clashes • Duplicate resources for parallel computation Dedicated address calculation hardware

6. Requirements for “perfect” DSP architecture - 3 • Extensive temporary registers to avoid unnecessary fetches of continually used data • Architecture allows easy parallel operation in multiprocessor systems -- NEW • Cycle time adjustable by instruction -- UNCOMMON • Duplicate resources for parallel computation of real and imaginary components -- UNCOMMON -- SIMD?

7. 2001 Final Exam - 1 • Assume that non-volatile registers have been saved as needed and that the DAG registers I4, M4, B4, L4, I3, M3, I12, M12 have been set correctly • A – circle the compute component of ONE 21k instruction • B – circle the first totally parallel instruction in code • C – circle the instructions that demonstrate Filling the algorithm pipeline

8. 2001 Final Exam – 1 -- DSA • A – circle the compute component of ONE 21k instruction -- OK • B – circle the first totally parallel instruction in code -- OK • C – circle the instructions that demonstrate Filling the algorithm pipeline – the dm and pm in 2 and the + and * in 4

9. 2001 Final Exam - 2 • Briefly explain, using the context of this code, the concept of pipeline in parallel instruction processors. • Answer – pipelines are necessary for parallelizing the above code since it involves using the same registers at different stages of the instruction cycle (Fetch, Decode, and Execute)

10. 2001 Final Exam - 3 • The code would be more understandable if the first instruction had been written as F9 = 0, R2 = 256 but that wasn’t not possible. Explain. • Answer – There is a set number of bits on the data bus, if the instruction uses too many constants, there may not be enough bit to store the number.

11. 2001 Final Exam – 3 – D.S.A • The code would be more understandable if the first instruction had been written as F9 = 0, R2 = 256 but that wasn’t not possible. Explain. • Answer – There is a set number of bits on the data bus, if the instruction uses too many constants, there may not be enough bit to store the number. • Answer – Incomplete – better – each constant takes 32 bits, total of 64 bits needed and only 48 bit program bus to carry instructions

12. 2001 Final Exam - 4 • The code will not provide the correct synchronous detection result. There are a number of ways of fixing the code. Would changing instruction 2 to F13=F13–F13, F1=dm(I4,M4), F5=pm(I12,M12); be one of them? • Answer – yes, because F13 is not set to 0 at first, it may be containing “garbage” when used, resulting in error.

13. 2001 Final Exam - 5 • Explain the differences and relative advantages between processors with a von Neumann and Harvard architecture. Address Bus Address Bus Address Bus CPU CPU ROM Data ROM Data Data Bus Data Bus Data Bus Harvard Von Neumann

14. 2001 Final Exam – 5 – D.S.A. • Picture’s are nice – but N. Q. A. – The question said “Relative advantages and disadvantages” and you never discussed these at all. Address Bus Address Bus Address Bus CPU CPU ROM Data ROM Data Data Bus Data Bus Data Bus Harvard Von Neumann

15. 2001 Final Exam - 6 • Using processors discussed in ENCM 515 provide examples of processors with a von Neumann and with a Harvard architecture. • Answer • von Neumann (68k) • Harvard (29k)

16. 2001 Final Exam - 7 • The SHARC 21k does not have a Harvard architecture but a Super Harvard ARChitecture. What are the advantages of having a super Harvard over the normal type, and under what circumstances will these advantages disappear. • Answer – The 21k allows caching of instruction for fast access. The advantage disappears when the cache is full or when cache thrash occurs.

17. 2001 Final Exam - 8 • Consider the code given earlier, will instruction 6 be cached? If it is, how do you know? If not, why? • Answer – No, caching only occurs when data access on PM bus conflicts with instruction access on the PM bus

18. 2001 Final Exam – 1 – D.S.A • Answer – No, caching only occurs when data access on PM bus conflicts with instruction access on the PM bus • ANSWER Yes -- 4 inside the loop clashes with 6 outside the loop

19. Homework • Saturation – arithmetic – Design, write and document an 21k assembly language code segment that accesses N points of a floating point array PMarray[] over the PM data bus, TRIPLES each value and sets all results above +25.0 to be equal to +25.0 before storing the result into a floating point array DMarray[] over the DM data bus. .segment/pm seg_pmda; .var PMarray[256]; // The initial array .endseg; .segment/dm seg_dmda; .var DMarray[512]; // The final array .var N; // The number of values to be converted .endseg;