1 / 51

Quality of Chest Compressions in Prehospital Care: Can it be done effectively

Quality of Chest Compressions in Prehospital Care: Can it be done effectively. Baxter Larmon, PhD, MICP Professor Medicine and Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Director UCLA Center for Prehospital Care. No Conflicts to Declare. May 20 th 2013.

niran
Download Presentation

Quality of Chest Compressions in Prehospital Care: Can it be done effectively

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Quality of Chest Compressions in Prehospital Care: Can it be done effectively Baxter Larmon, PhD, MICP Professor Medicine and Emergency Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA Director UCLA Center for Prehospital Care

  2. No Conflicts to Declare

  3. May 20th 2013

  4. More than 150 published within the last year

  5. I will focus on two UCLA projects • Los Angeles Quality Improvement project • On going • Study by UCLA Center for Prehospital Care • Currently submitted for publication and presented at ECC Scientific Assembly

  6. CARDIAC ARRESTA TIME FOR CHANGEQuality Improvement Project Los Angeles County Dr. Dan Davis UCSD Center for Resuscitation Science Assistance by: William Koenig MD, Baxter Larmon, PhD, Susan Mori, RN, Todd LeGassick, MPH

  7. QI Project • Partnership • UCSD • LA County DHS • UCLA Center for Prehospital Care • Zoll Corporation • Equipment and Education support ONLY • Started December 2010 • Five Fire Departments in LA County • 1 Department dropped out

  8. QI Project • Pre – ART • Defib pads were modified, monitors had memory cards placed • No educational intervention • Providers were asked to contact a ART Coordinator when a cardiac arrest occurred • ART coordinator would gather data with 48 hours of arrest when possible

  9. QI Project • Pre-ART • Standard Procedures • Post – ART • Same as above • Feedback on monitor turned on • Intervention / during regular CE • First Month 2 hour lecture • Next Month 1.5 skills • Data collected

  10. Data Collection • Duration • Total time of arrest in minutes • Compression Depth within Target - % ofTarget >2 and < 3.5 inches • Compression Rate within Target • % Target 100 -120 compressions per minute • Time in Compressions • % of time that chest compression performed during entire arrest

  11. Data Collection • Overall quality entire duration • % of time that both depth and rate are within target • Time to Shock • Time in minutes of stopping compression to deliver shock • Number of Shocks

  12. Data Presentation • 109 cases Collected • 71 pre ART • 38 post ART • Convenient Sampling from 1 Fire Department • 3 Pre ART and 3 Post ART • All presented data was in a 3 month window Still collecting data

  13. Pre ART

  14. Pre ART 1 / Case # 62 Duration of Arrest = 20 Minutes 0 % in Depth Target Target = 2- 3.5 inches

  15. Key Pre ART 1 / Case # 62 CPR Periods Target Zones Depth of Compression Rate of Compression Key CPR Periods Target Zones Duration of Arrest = 20 Minutes 1 % Target Rate Target Rate = 80 -120 minute

  16. Pre ART 1 / Case # 62 Duration of Arrest = 20 Minutes 0 % in Target of both Rate and Depth

  17. Pre ART 2 / Case # 65 Duration of Arrest = 26 Minutes 10 % in Target Depth Target = 2- 3.5 inches

  18. Pre ART 2 / Case # 65 Duration of Arrest = 26 Minutes 11 % in Target Rate Target Rate = 80 -120 minute

  19. Pre ART 2 / Case # 65 Duration of Arrest = 26 Minutes 1 % in Target of both Rate and Depth

  20. Pre ART 3 / Case # 55 Duration of Arrest = 30 Minutes 2 % in Target Depth Target = 2- 3.5 inches

  21. Pre ART 3 / Case # 55 Duration of Arrest = 30 Minutes 26 % in Target Rate Target Rate = 80 -120 minute

  22. Pre ART 3 / Case # 55 Duration of Arrest = 30 Minutes 2 % in Target of both Rate and Depth

  23. Pre ART 3 / Case # 55 Duration of Arrest = 30 Minutes Delay in compressions average 47 seconds in 5 shocks

  24. Post ART

  25. Post ART 1 / Case # 74 Duration of Arrest = 34 Minutes 92 % in Target Depth Target = 2- 3.5 inches

  26. Post ART 1 / Case # 74 Duration of Arrest = 34 Minutes 81 % in Target Rate Target Rate = 80 -120 minute

  27. Post ART 1 / Case # 74 Duration of Arrest = 34 Minutes 88 % in Target of both Rate and Depth

  28. Post ART 2 / Case # 72 Duration of Arrest = 21Minutes 81 % in Target Depth Target = 2- 3.5 inches

  29. Post ART 2 / Case # 72 Duration of Arrest = 21Minutes 99 % in Target Rate Target Rate = 80 -120 minute

  30. Post ART 2 / Case # 72 Duration of Arrest = 21Minutes 81 % in Target of both Rate and Depth

  31. Post ART 3 / Case # 71 Duration of Arrest = 43 Minutes 90 % in Target depth Target = 2- 3.5 inches

  32. Post ART 3 / Case # 71 Duration of Arrest = 43 Minutes 90 % in Target Rate Target Rate = 80 -120 minute

  33. Post ART 3 / Case # 71 Duration of Arrest = 43 Minutes 82 % in Target of both Rate and Depth

  34. Post ART 3 / Case # 71 Duration of Arrest = 43 Minutes Delay in compressions average 3 seconds in 6 shocks

  35. Comparison Pre and Post ART

  36. Total Elapsed Time of Cardiac Arrest (minutes) Need Graph, % Pre ART Post ART

  37. Comparison Pre and Post ARTCompression Depth in Target (%) Need Graph, % Pre ART Post ART

  38. Comparison Pre and Post ARTCompression Rate in Target (%) Need Graph, % Pre ART Post ART

  39. Comparison Pre and Post ARTOverall Chest Compression Quality Need Graph, % Pre ART Post ART

  40. Hard To Teach An Old Dog A NEW Trick

  41. Feedback Graph

  42. Presented toAHA ECC

  43. Method • 35 Paramedic students recently completing a AHA HCP BLS Course • Each subject randomly drew three cards • Each card allowed them to perform chest compressions for a 2 minute period of time in three different positions • Backboard on the ground • Backboard on the stretcher in the lowered position • Backboard on a stretcher in the raised position

  44. Method continued • They were given a six minute rest between each attempt • Data was collected

  45. Conclusion • Effective compressions must be done on the ground or on a stretcher in the lowered position • There is a degradation of chest compression over time

  46. Currently studying this Summer • Quality of Chest Compressions on a moving gurney • Does body mass index effect the quality of chest compressions

More Related