60 likes | 592 Views
American Bar Association Section of Intellectual Property Law PANEL DISCUSSION The Future of Patent Preparation and Prosecution Sponsored by Committee 508 Economics of the Profession Why Have a Panel Discussion? Cross Currents Big GP firms can’t do prep & pros profitably/effectively.
E N D
American Bar AssociationSection of Intellectual Property Law
PANEL DISCUSSION The Future of Patent Preparation and Prosecution
Why Have a Panel Discussion?Cross Currents • Big GP firms can’t do prep & pros profitably/effectively. • Boutiques are dying. • Companies don’t want to train/support prep & pros. • Companies can’t find effective counsel for prep & pros.
Four Law Firm/Corporate Representatives • Boutique Patent Law Firm • Schwegman, Lundberg, Woessner & Kluth • GP Firm With Patent Section • Howrey Simon Arnold & White • Corporation That Sends Out Most Prosecution • Microsoft • Corporation That Keeps Most Prosecution In-House • GlaxoSmithKline
FORMAT • Bradley A. Forrest – Shareholder, Schwegman, Lundberg, Woessner & Kluth, Minneapolis, MN • Roger May – Partner, Howrey Simon Arnold & White, and President & CEO, Maxiam (A Howrey company), Chicago, IL • Mark A. Guetlich – Corporate Attorney, Patent Group, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA • Robert A. Brink – VP, Intellectual Property, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC • Questions