1 / 16

THE APOCALYPSE

THE APOCALYPSE. AN OVERVIEW OF THE BOOK’S HISTORY OF INTERPRETATION By Noel Platt. THE ANTI NICEAN AGE. Two main views of the Apocalypse were held during this period: (1) The Historicist view ( Historico-eschatological) view. Supported by Papias, Justin Martyr, Hippolytus, Irenaeus,

niveditha
Download Presentation

THE APOCALYPSE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. THE APOCALYPSE AN OVERVIEW OF THE BOOK’S HISTORY OF INTERPRETATION By Noel Platt

  2. THE ANTI NICEAN AGE • Two main views of the Apocalypse were held during this period: • (1) The Historicist view (Historico-eschatological) view. • Supported by Papias, Justin Martyr, Hippolytus, Irenaeus, • Revelation largely concerned with contemporary or imminent historical happenings but with some future elements. • Justin Martyr., ‘Dial. C. Tryph. 81 • Irenaeus., ‘Against Heresies V’ • Hypolytus., ‘On the Devil & Antichrist’ • (2) The Allegorical view. • Maintained by the Alexandrian School under Origen and Clement of Alexandria • Swete ,H.B., The Apocalypse of St. John, MacMillan & Co. (1911)

  3. THE ANTI NICEAN AGE • The First Latin Commentary. • Produced by Victorinus of Petau, in the third century. • The first to advocate the Nero Redivivus Myth – that the beast whose deadly wound was healed was Nero risen from the dead. • The first to set forth a RECAPITULATION theory – that Revelation repeats the same facts in different forms again & again under the seal, trumpet and bowl visions.

  4. THE FOURTH CENTURY TO THE REFORMATION. • Tyconius’ Commentary. • A systematic allegorical theory • Andreas’ Commentary. • Combined historical & allegorical elements • Berenguard’s Commentary. • Similar to Andreas’, with Rev. covering the whole of human history. • Joachim’s Commentary. • Identified Revelations visions with 12th century historical expectations. • Nicholas of Lyra’s Commentary (14th century) • Rev depicts history from the time of Domitian to his own time.

  5. THE REFORMATION • This period was marked by the emergence of two influential views: • The Futurist View (Endgeschichtlich view) • Ribeira Francisco., ‘Commentarius in sacram beati Joannis apocalypsim’ Salamanca 1591 • First chapters of Rev about the first century • The rest of Rev about the last 3 ½ years of time. • Babylon is a degenerate Rome of the future –not Papal Rome. • The Preterist View (Zeitgeschichtlich view) • de Alcazar Louis., ‘Vestigato arcani sensus in Apocalypsi’ Antwerp 1614 and 1619. • Most of Rev. fulfilled in first century before destruction of Jerusalem. • Rev 4-11 are about conflict between the Church & Judaism • Rev 12-19 concerned with conflict between Church & Paganism. • Rev 20-22 deals with the Church’s final triumph.

  6. 17th & 18th Century views. • Various Historical views emerged from: • Joseph Mede • The scheme spanned from Domitian’s time to his own • Sir Isaac Newton (the famous Scientist!) • The scheme spanned from Domitian’s time to his own • William Whiston • The scheme spanned from Domitian’s time to his own • Vitringa • As above • Bengel • As above • Grotius • Proposed a Preterist historical view • Hammond • Offered a Preterist historical view • Eichhorn • Proposed a Drama Theory.

  7. 19th & 20th Century • Historicist views were losing credibility during this period because their predictions invariably failed and constantly had to be updated to fit the latest impending historical situation. • The ‘Millennial Dawnists’ in the U.S A used the book of Revelation & Daniel to produce a series failed prophecies of the return of Christ. • More commentators began to embrace the Futurist position. (Maitland, Williams, Bisping & others). • Development of New Approaches.

  8. 19th & 20th Century • Historical Critical Analysis gave rise to a variety of theories: • Source theories • Revelation’s author used SOURCES to write his book. • Revision theories. • Rev was revised by a series of authors • Incorporation theories • Compilation theories • Oral Tradition –Form Criticism (Formgeschichte) • Gunkel ., ‘Schopfung und Chaos’ 1895. • Author of Rev derived his material from oral traditions found in Apocalyptic writings, the Old Testament and eschatological tradition handed down over the centuries • Eschatological oral tradition is traceable to a particular ‘FORM’.

  9. 19th & 20th Century • Archaeology • Ramsay W, M., The bearing of Recent Discovery on the Trustworthiness of the New Testament, London, 1915. • In 1880 he started an archaeological investigation of the ancient cities to whom the letters in Rev. were written and concluded: • The manner in which each Church is described in Rev is consistent with the natural scenery and geographical environment. • Yamouchi E.M., ‘New Testament Cities in Western Asia Minor:light from archaeology on cities of Paul and the Seven Churches of Revelation’, Grand Rapids, 1980. • Has continued archaeological work in this field.

  10. The 19th & 20th Century • Emergence of the Eclectic/ Idealist view. • Milligan W.,’ The Revelation of St John’ 1886 • The Apocalypse embraces the whole Christian age • It deals with the action of great principles • It should be interpreted in a Spiritual Sense. • Additional influences: • Jesus’ Olivet Discourse (Mat 24) • Recollections from Jesus’ life from John’s Gospel • The historical and prophetic books of the Old Testament. • Related views: • The Sychronist view. • Hendriksen W., ‘More than Conquerors’, Grand Rapids, 1967. • Combines Eclectic tenets with a RECAPITULATION theory. • Revelation consists of Seven Parallel Sections. • Each repeats the themes of the previous section more vividly • Each section spans the entire period from the first to the second coming of Christ. • Symbols refer to principles of human conduct or divine moral government.

  11. Other 20th Century Views • THE PATCHWORK THEORY • Moffatt,J., Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament ,Edinburgh, 1918 • Moffatt proposed that Revelation compiled from a Patchwork of Sources to produce a series of visions stitched together by a number of intermezzos (Rev 7:1-17, 10:1-11, 14:1-20). • THE POETIC THEORY • Kiddle, M., 'The Revelation of St John, London,1940 • Revelation has no previously thought out scheme of development because it’s author was a visionary poet. Each recurring theme adds new colour to the overall impression

  12. Other 20th Century Views • THE SYMBOLISM THEORY • 'Farrer. A.,A Rebirth of Images, Westminster, 1949 • There are three keys to Revelation: • The number 7 • Astrology • The Jewish Liturgy • A highly subjective theory. • THE DRAMA THEORY • Benson, E., 'The Apocalypse: Structure and Principles of Interpretation, 1900, • The book written along the lines of a Greek Drama • Angelic announcements parallels the use of the Gods in Greek drama • It’s Hymnic sections are compared with the Greek Chorus. • THE SEVEN FOLD DESIGN THEORY • Proposed by several scholars:‘ • Lohmeyer. E. Die Offenbarung des Johannes', 1953 • LoenertzR.L., 'The Apocalypse of St. John, trans into English by H.J Carpenter, London 1947 • Loenertz proposes the book divided into seven groups of seven sections • Lohmeyer, an even more intricate scheme.

  13. Other 20th Century Views • THE LITURGICAL PATTERN THEORY • Shepherd M. 'The Paschal Liturgy and the Apocalypse', London 1960 • Rev based on the Paschal (Passover) Liturgy • Rev 1-3 represents the Scrutinies • Rev 4-6 represents the vigil. • Rev 7 represents the initiation. • Rev 8-19 depicts the Synaxis • Rev 19-22 depicts the Eucharist. • The evidence for the liturgy appears to be LATER than the apocalypse and thus no dependence can be placed on it.

  14. Other 20th Century Views • THE CONCENTRIC PATTERN THEORY • Schssler-Fiorenza, E., 'Composition and Structure of the Apocalypse', Catholic Bible Quarterly 39, 1977, 344-366, reprinted in 'The Book of Revelation. Justice and Judgment', 159-180 • Rev based on a concentric structured series of seven visions climaxing/centring on the fourth vision: • (A) Rev 1:1-8 • (B) Rev 1:9-3:22 • (C) Rev 4:1-9:21 & Rev 11:15-19 • (D) Rev 10:1-15:4 (Centre of concentric structure) • (C') Rev 15:5-19:10 • (B') Rev 19:11-22:9 • (A') Rev 22:10-21. • Connections between A and A', B and B', C and C' are not easy to establish • Rev does not seem to give the impression of coming to a climax in the centre, -rather at the end.

  15. Other 20th Century Views • THE HISTORICAL PROPHETIC THEORY • Corsini, E., Apocalisse prima e dopo', Eng. tr. 'The Apocalypse', Wilmington, 1983 • Rev points towards Christ’s first coming. • The first part of the book prepares the way for an exposition of Christ’s death from various points of view. • Rev 17-19:10 is concerned with Christ’s death as 'Judgement on History', Rev 19:11-20:15 deals with Christ’s death as the final destruction of all evil forces. • The remainder is concerned with connecting Christ’s death with the new Jerusalem. • THE HISTORICAL APOCALYPTIC THEORY • Hopkins, M., 'The Historical Perspective of Apocalypse 1-11', Catholic Bible Quarterly 27, 1965, 42-47 • The first eleven chapters of Rev depict the church's triumph over Judaism • The second half (Rev12-22) predicts the impending judgements of God on Rome • It is not clear however, why the seal and trumpet visions should relate to the past and the bowls to the future

  16. Other 20th Century Views • THE PESHER THEORY • Thiering, B. Jesus of the Apocalypse. London: Corgi. (1997), • The Christian community employed the same technique (Pesher) that the Qumran community used to read the historical happenings of it’s time into the Old Testament scriptures • Revelation is a compilation of books written by different authors, James Niceta (Rev 8:6-14:5), John Aquila (Rev 1:1-8:5), Tychicus (Rev 14:6-19:21) and another John (Rev 20:1-22:21), who used the Pesher technique. • This claim appears to be inconsistent with the results of linguistic studies which conclude that the book is a synthetic unity written by a single author. • Produces a radical view of first century happenings which lacks adequate justification.

More Related