1 / 33

Gestational Diabetes Review & Advances in Treatment

Gestational Diabetes Review & Advances in Treatment. Virginia Underwood, Capt, USAF, MC Family Practice Resident David Grant Medical Center. Overview. Definition Screening Conventional Treatments New Treatments Goals Postpartum Screening. Questions.

nizana
Download Presentation

Gestational Diabetes Review & Advances in Treatment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Gestational DiabetesReview & Advances in Treatment Virginia Underwood, Capt, USAF, MC Family Practice Resident David Grant Medical Center

  2. Overview • Definition • Screening • Conventional Treatments • New Treatments • Goals • Postpartum Screening

  3. Questions • Does screening for and treating GDM affect infant or maternal morbidity or mortality? • Does antepartum fetal testing prevent stillbirth or infant morbidity? • Does postpartum glucose tolerance testing have an appreciable long term impact on women with a history of GDM?

  4. Epidemiology • 3-7% of pregnant women in the U.S. • Increasing prevalence • Risk factors: • >25 yrs • Hispanic, Native American, South or East Asian, Pacific Islands, African American • BMI >25 • Previous history glucose intolerance • History obstetric outcomes associated with GDM • History diabetes in a first degree relative

  5. Question #1 Does screening for and treating GDM affect infant or maternal morbidity or mortality?

  6. GDM Criteria *2 or more criteria met = positive diagnosis (cutoff points in mg/dl) † 1 or more criteria met = positive diagnosis

  7. Screening & Diagnosis • Screen: 50g glucose 1 hour glucose challenge • non-fasting state (higher or similar values with fast) • Diagnosis: 100g, 3 hour glucose tolerance test • Positive test = 2 or more thresholds met/exceeded • No smoking prior • Unrestricted diet: at least 150g carbohydrates/d for at least 3 days prior (to avoid spurious high values) • One abnormal value with increased risk for macrosomic infants & associated morbidities

  8. When to Screen? • 24-28 weeks gestation • Early screening: • marked obesity • personal history of GDM (33-50% likelihood recurrence) • glycosuria • strong family history of diabetes

  9. Maternal glucose intolerance Adverse pregnancy outcomes

  10. Recommendations • USPSTF: “evidence is insufficient to recommend for or against routine screeening.” (did find fair - good evidence that screening for GDM and treatment of hyperglycemia could reduce the frequency of fetal macrosomia) • ADA: officially recommends screening for GDM, but may omit low risk women • ACOG: universal screening is the most sensitive approach; screening may be omitted in low risk women, but universal screening as more practical approach

  11. Treatment Questions • Does GDM pose serious risks to offspring? • Does treatment reduce those risks? • Does treatment reduce other risks associated with GDM (obesity/diabetes in offspring)? • Does reducing glycemia reduce risks? (macrosomia & cesarean delivery)

  12. Macrosomia Brachial plexus injury Fracture with delivery Fetal hypoglycemia Fetal hyperbilirubinemia Fetal hypocalcemia Childhood obesity Neuropsychological outcomes Development of diabetes Perinatal mortality 3rd/4th degree lacerations Instrument deliveries Cesarean delivery Preeclampsia Future diabetes mellitus Potential risks

  13. Confounding Factors • Fetal size: maternal glucose levels, maternal BMI, pregnancy weight gain, parity • Spectrum of sugars of normal to diabetic patients (single abnormal value of 3hGTT  large for gestational infants) • Normal pregnancies with very narrow glucose range (euglycemia difficult to achieve) • Alerting physicians to increased risk

  14. Confounding Factors • Large number of subjects needed • 450 infants undergoing cesarean delivery to prevent one permanent brachial plexus injury • Lowered cesarean delivery threshold: resulting morbidity and costs outweigh benefits?

  15. Research-Crowther et al. • Multicenter, 1000 women • 75g oral glucose tolerance test between 24-32 weeks gestation • Subjects: below 140 fasting, and between 140-198 at 2 hours after glucose challenge • Intervention: glucose monitoring, dietary counseling/insulin to maintain sugars • Goals: premeal/fasting <99 and 2h postprandial <126 • Control: routine care where GDM screening not standard

  16. Crowther et al. Results • Intervention group with reduced: • Perinatal death (5 v. 0) • Shoulder dystocia • Bone fracture • Nerve palsy • Macrosomia (≥4kg: 21% v. 10%) • Postpartum depression (health status)

  17. Crowther et al. Results • Cesarean delivery rates similar between groups • Control group with reduced: • Inductions of labor • Admissions to neonatal intensive care unit

  18. Research- Langer et al. • 555 gestational diabetics diagnosed after 37 weeks v. 1110 subjects treated for gestational diabetes mellitus and 1110 nondiabetic subjects • Adverse outcomes: 59% for untreated, 18% for treated, and 11% for nondiabetic • 2- to 4-fold increase in metabolic complications and macrosomia/LGA in the untreated group & no difference between nondiabetic and treated Increasing evidence that identifying women with GDM is important because appropriate therapy can decrease fetal and maternal morbidity, particularly macrosomia

  19. Upcoming studies • Maternal-Fetal Medicine Network multicenter trial of treatment of mild GDM • HAPO- Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome study

  20. Treatment Recommendations • American Diabetes Association: • Nutrition counseling • Carbohydrates: 35-40% of daily calories • (caution for ketosis  IQ/psychomotor development) • BMI >30kg/m2: lowering daily calories by 30% (goal 25kcal/kg actual weight per day)

  21. Treatment Recommendations • Trial 2 weeks (if initial fasting <95) • Initial fasting >95 unlikely to be controlled • Exercise: • Weight reduction and improve glucose metabolism • Effects on fasting glucose/tolerance & macrosomia

  22. Glucose goals • Fasting <90-105 • 1h <130-140 • 2h <120 • 38% with initial fasting glucose <95 required insulin for optimal control • 70% with initial fasting glucose 95-104

  23. Monitoring • Frequency not established • Reduces?: • Perinatal mortality/hypoglycemia/shoulder dystocia • Macrosomia • Timing: • Fasting v. postprandial (nadirs v. glucose excesses) • 1h v. 2h postprandial • Severe/preexistent v. mild  frequency

  24. Insulin • When: • > 95 or 105 fasting • >120 2 h postprandial • Initial dose: 0.7U/kg/day • AM 2/3  2/3 NPH, 1/3 Reg • PM 1/3  1/2 NPH, 1/2 Reg • *once daily ultralente with very short acting lispro insulin

  25. Oral hypoglycemics • Previous concerns: (Diabinese & Orinase) • 1st generation sulfonylureas • Potential teratogenicity • Transport across placenta (hypoglycemia) • Glyburide: • 2nd generation sulfonylurea • Does not enter fetal circulation (in vitro/vivo) • Comparable maternal/neonatal outcomes • Less maternal hypoglycemia • Metformin (PCOS, gestational diabetes, first trimester miscarriage rates)

  26. Glyburide • Start: 2.5 mg once or twice daily • Increase: by 2.5 mg to 5 mg at weekly intervals as needed until maximum dose of 20 mg daily • Peak plasma level of glyburide: 2–4 hours after administration • Timing administration with hyperglycemia (daytime/fasting) • Fasting hyperglycemia on diet: higher dose/bid • 5-20% conversion to insulin *fasting plasma glucose <110 & no sulfa allergy

  27. Question #2 Does antepartum fetal testing prevent stillbirth or infant morbidity?

  28. Antepartum Fetal Testing • Purpose: identify patients at risk for stillbirth • Stillbirth rare occurrence • Practice patterns: starting at 32-40 weeks gestation • ACOG: • Glucose not well controlled • Requiring insulin • Concomitant hypertension • NST/AFI, full biophysical profile • No evidence regarding fetal ultrasound  macrosomia Insufficient evidence regarding impact of antenatal fetal testing on stillbirth rate, and neonatal morbidity

  29. Question #3 Does postpartum glucose tolerance testing have an appreciable long term impact on women with a history of GDM?

  30. Postpartum screening • 50% women with GDM developing diabetes mellitus in a 28yr study (v. 7% of controls) • Possible preexistent diabetes • 6-8wks postpartum • 2h OGTT (75g) • Impaired: 140-199 (100-125) • DM: ≥ 200 (≥ 126) • Diet, exercise, weight reduction counseling No long-term follow-up studies that verify the benefit of postpartum diagnostic testing

  31. Summary • Definition • Screening • Conventional Treatments • New Treatments • Goals • Postpartum Screening

  32. Bibliography • 1. Langer O, Conway DL, Berkus MD, Xenakis EM-J, Gonzales O. A comparison of glyburide and insulin in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. NEJM 2000;343:1134–8. • 2. Saade, George. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Pill or a Shot?. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005; 105:456-7. • 3. Turok d, Ratcliffe S, Baxley E. Management of gestational diabetes mellitus. American Family Physician 2003; 68: 1767-1772. • 4. Greene M, Solomom C. Gestational diabetes mellitus – time to treat. NEJM 2005; 352: 2544-2546. • 5. Crowther C, Hiller J, Moss J, McPhee A, Jeffries W, Robinson J. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. NEJM 2005; 352: 2477-2486. • 6. Kjos S, Buchanan T. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus – current concepts. NEJM 1999; 341: 1749-1756. • 7. Naylor C, Phil D, Sermer M, Chen E, Farine D. Selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. NEJM 1997; 337: 1591-1597. • 8. Caughey A. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy. Johns Hopkins Advanced Studies in Medicine 2006: 309-318. • 9. Gestational Diabetes. ACOG Practice Bulletin. 2006: 518-531.

  33. Questions? Sugar-free chocolate mousse cake

More Related