1 / 26

Redox Geochemistry

Redox Geochemistry. WHY?. Redox gradients drive life processes! The transfer of electrons between oxidants and reactants is harnessed as the battery, the source of metabolic energy for organisms

Download Presentation

Redox Geochemistry

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Redox Geochemistry

  2. WHY? • Redox gradients drive life processes! • The transfer of electrons between oxidants and reactants is harnessed as the battery, the source of metabolic energy for organisms • Metal mobility  redox state of metals and ligands that may complex them is the critical factor in the solubility of many metals • Contaminant transport • Ore deposit formation

  3. REDOX CLASSIFICATION OF NATURAL WATERS Oxicwaters - waters that contain measurable dissolved oxygen. Suboxic waters - waters that lack measurable oxygen or sulfide, but do contain significant dissolved iron (> ~0.1 mg L-1). Reducing waters(anoxic) - waters that contain both dissolved iron and sulfide.

  4. O2 Aerobes Oxic H2O Dinitrofiers NO3- N2 Maganese reducers Post - oxic MnO2 Mn2+ Iron reducers Fe(OH)3 Fe2+ SO42- Sulfate reducers Sulfidic H2S CO2 Methanogens CH4 Methanic H2O H2 The Redox ladder The redox-couples are shown on each stair-step, where the most energy is gained at the top step and the least at the bottom step. (Gibb’s free energy becomes more positive going down the steps)

  5. Oxidation – Reduction Reactions • Oxidation - a process involving loss of electrons. • Reduction - a process involving gain of electrons. • Reductant - a species that loses electrons. • Oxidant - a species that gains electrons. • Free electrons do not exist in solution. Any electron lost from one species in solution must be immediately gained by another. Ox1 + Red2 Red1 + Ox2 LEO says GER

  6. Half Reactions • Often split redox reactions in two: • oxidation half rxn  • Fe2+ Fe3+ + e- • Reduction half rxn  • O2 + 4 e- + 4H+  2 H2O • SUM of the half reactions yields the total redox reaction 4 Fe2+ 4 Fe3+ + 4 e- O2 + 4 e- + 4 H+ 2 H2O 4 Fe2+ + O2 + 4 H+  4 Fe3+ + 2 H2O

  7. Redox Couples • For any half reaction, the oxidized/reduced pair is the redox couple: • Fe2+ Fe3+ + e- • Couple: Fe2+/Fe3+ • H2S + 4 H2O  SO42- + 10 H+ + 8 e- • Couple: H2S/SO42-

  8. ELECTRON ACTIVITY • Although no free electrons exist in solution, it is useful to define a quantity called the electron activity: • The pe indicates the tendency of a solution to donate or accept a proton. • If pe is low, there is a strong tendency for the solution to donate protons - the solution is reducing. • If pe is high, there is a strong tendency for the solution to accept protons - the solution is oxidizing.

  9. THE pe OF A HALF REACTION - I Consider the half reaction MnO2(s) + 4H+ + 2e- Mn2+ + 2H2O(l) The equilibrium constant is Solving for the electron activity

  10. THE pe OF A HALF REACTION - II Taking the logarithm of both sides of the above equation and multiplying by -1 we obtain: or

  11. THE pe OF A HALF REACTION - III We can calculate K from: so

  12. WE NEED A REFERENCE POINT! Values of pe are meaningless without a point of reference with which to compare. Such a point is provided by the following reaction: ½H2(g)  H+ + e- By convention so K = 1.

  13. THE STANDARD HYDROGEN ELECTRODE If a cell were set up in the laboratory based on the half reaction ½H2(g)  H+ + e- and the conditions aH+ = 1 (pH = 0) and pH2 = 1, it would be called the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE). If conditions are constant in the SHE, no reaction occurs, but if we connect it to another cell containing a different solution, electrons may flow and a reaction may occur.

  14. STANDARD HYDROGEN ELECTRODE ½H2(g)  H+ + e-

  15. ELECTROCHEMICAL CELL Fe3++ e- Fe2+ ½H2(g)  H+ + e-

  16. ELECTROCHEMICAL CELL We can calculate the pe of the cell on the right with respect to SHE using: If the activities of both iron species are equal, pe = 12.8. If a Fe2+/a Fe3+ = 0.05, then The electrochemical cell shown gives us a method of measuring the redox potential of an unknown solution vs. SHE.

  17. DEFINITION OF Eh Eh - the potential of a solution relative to the SHE. Both pe and Eh measure essentially the same thing. They may be converted via the relationship: Where  = 96.42 kJ volt-1 eq-1 (Faraday’s constant). At 25°C, this becomes or

  18. Eh – Measurement and meaning • Eh is the driving force for a redox reaction • No exposed live wires in natural systems (usually…)  where does Eh come from? • From Nernst  redox couples exist at some Eh (Fe2+/Fe3+=1, Eh = +0.77V) • When two redox species (like Fe2+ and O2) come together, they should react towards equilibrium • Total Eh of a solution is measure of that equilibrium

  19. FIELD APPARATUS FOR Eh MEASUREMENTS

  20. CALIBRATION OF ELECTRODES • The indicator electrode is usually platinum. • In practice, the SHE is not a convenient field reference electrode. • More convenient reference electrodes include saturated calomel (SCE - mercury in mercurous chloride solution) or silver-silver chloride electrodes. • A standard solution is employed to calibrate the electrode. • Zobell’s solution - solution of potassium ferric-ferro cyanide of known Eh.

  21. CONVERTING ELECTRODE READING TO Eh Once a stable potential has been obtained, the reading can be converted to Eh using the equation Ehsys = Eobs + EhZobell - EhZobell-observed Ehsys = the Eh of the water sample. Eobs = the measured potential of the water sample relative to the reference electrode. EhZobell = the theoretical Eh of the Zobell solution EhZobell = 0.428 - 0.0022 (t - 25) EhZobell-observed = the measured potential of the Zobell solution relative to the reference electrode.

  22. PROBLEMS WITH Eh MEASUREMENTS • Natural waters contain many redox couples NOT at equilibrium; it is not always clear to which couple (if any) the Eh electrode is responding. • Eh values calculated from redox couples often do not correlate with each other or directly measured Eh values. • Eh can change during sampling and measurement if caution is not exercised. • Electrode material (Pt usually used, others also used) • Many species are not electroactive (do NOT react electrode) • Many species of O, N, C, As, Se, and S are not electroactive at Pt • electrode can become poisoned by sulfide, etc.

  23. Figure 5-6 from Kehew (2001). Plot of Eh values computed from the Nernst equation vs. field-measured Eh values.

  24. Other methods of determining the redox state of natural systems • For some, we can directly measure the redox couple (such as Fe2+ and Fe3+) • Techniques to directly measure redox SPECIES: • Amperometry (ion specific electrodes) • Voltammetry • Chromatography • Spectrophotometry/ colorimetry • EPR, NMR • Synchrotron based XANES, EXAFS, etc.

  25. Free Energy and Electropotential • Talked about electropotential (aka emf, Eh)  driving force for e- transfer • How does this relate to driving force for any reaction defined by DGr ?? DGr = nDE or DG0r = nDE0 • Where n is the # of e-’s in the rxn,  is Faraday’s constant (23.06 cal V-1), and E is electropotential (V) • pe for an electron transfer between a redox couple analagous to pK between conjugate acid-base pair

  26. Electromotive Series • When we put two redox species together, they will react towards equilibrium, i.e., e- will move  which ones move electrons from others better is the electromotive series • Measurement of this is through the electropotential for half-reactions of any redox couple (like Fe2+ and Fe3+) • Because DGr = nDE, combining two half reactions in a certain way will yield either a + or – electropotential (additive, remember to switch sign when reversing a rxn) -E  - DGr, therefore  spontaneous • In order of decreasing strength as a reducing agent  strong reducing agents are better e- donors

More Related