180 likes | 294 Views
PCC Strategic Communications Workshop. 5 June 2013. Overview. Workshop outcomes Challenge common comms misconceptions Using comms as a strategic tool for change Recap PCC leadership brand and impact on comms Plot overarching comms strategy for full PCC term
E N D
PCC StrategicCommunications Workshop 5 June 2013
Overview • Workshop outcomes • Challenge common comms misconceptions • Using comms as a strategic tool for change • Recap PCC leadership brand and impact on comms • Plot overarching comms strategy for full PCC term • Identify hot stakeholders, issues and tactics • Direct the priority comms activity for 2013-14 • Golden rules for a successful session! • Trust the process and don’t jump to outcomes/actions • Everyone to interact, question and share their views • Frank and open approach, confidentiality assurance
Strategic Communications doesn’t‘Tell people things’ It identifies ‘What do you want people to think, feel and do differently?’ and helps make this happen
Myth-busting: Five common comms mistakes • Spreading effort too thinly across multiple issues • Better to tackle single priority issues sequentially • Presuming message sent = message understood • Seek feedback and monitor behavioural changes • Hearing those who speak loudest • Significant groups may be smaller and harder to hear • Need means of access and encouragement to do so • Over-emphasis on media relations and coverage • Media reach and public trust continues to erode • More people self-source (local TV is an exception) • Thinking ‘no comment’ is still the cardinal sin • Sometimes a carefully-worded ‘nothing’ is best!
Myth-busting: Five things strategic comms can’t do! • Achieve change or have long-term impact alone • Needs to be supported by wider organisational actions • Deliver ‘something for nothing’… …although it can deliver ‘a lot for relatively little’! • With investment of time, access and resources • Achieve change or a lasting impact overnight • Most effective strategic comms is planned, long-term • Reactive responses important, but aligned to strategy • Create entirely favourable media or public views • Media continues to have a legitimate role to scrutinise • Different stakeholders will view actions differently • Defend the indefensible • Organisations and people inevitably make mistakes • Build public trust by putting hands up, not covering up
The more you want comms to achieve, the greater the difficulty… …but significant and real change is possible with a clear strategy, time, consistency and layering effective tactics
Strategic Comms as a tool for change • Now a valued tool for major crime investigations • Building internal trust and access leads to innovation and operational impact • Tackling Domestic Abuse under-reporting • Changing internal attitudes, building advocacy and increasing victim confidence
Brand, sphere and communications impact • Personal brand operates across three spheres • Internal values and motivators (some private) • Visible personal leadership brand and styles • As the personification of the Office (and vice-versa) • Consistency across the three spheres • Inconsistencies can be exposed (e.g. social media) • Reputation of the Office is greater and longer-term than any individual, although it can evolve with them • Points of distinction or alignment to the Force • Both its senior individuals and its corporate brand
Upfront In the fray – leading Determined Innovative Physically engaging Focussed, seen to be focussed and delivering Committed PCC leadership brand • At the end of year one what does PCC Katy Bourne want to be known for: making a difference – and specifically to victims of Domestic Abuse • For whom: Women, families, victims • To what: Under-reporting – the process and treatment of victims • What is Katy Bourne’s personal style:
PCC leadership narrative • What is the story Katy Bourne wants to tell? • Katy Bourne really understands what it’s like for victims (particularly of DA & ASB) • Focus on Victims – what’s the distinctive angle? • The treatment of victims in the CJS • Focus on Domestic Abuse – what’s the distinctive angle? • Something that happens behind closed doors • Affects all involved: especially families and children • Ideal to lead nationally
Why Communications Strategy matters Building this long-term strategy and identifying priority tactics for the PCC
Stakeholder identification • Pre-populated with common stakeholder groups and some identified PCC priorities • Granulation is essential • Don’t be scared to break-down wider groups • If they have different triggers/concerns, split them • Prioritisation and mapping • Many models - important thing is to use one! • Our suggested method merges two – measuring influence/engagement and positivity
Stakeholder prioritisation • With colour-coded labels of • likely view on the issue: • Positive (a potential advocate) • Neutral or unknown • Negative (a likely opponent) Engagement (how engaged they already are with you) • Use the model to expand, segment and prioritise the pre-populated groups • Who are the top 3-5 over the full PCC term of office? Influence (how much they can affect or are affected by an issue)
Outcome mapping • At end of the current PCC term identify what you want your stakeholders to: • Think • Feel • Do • Specify ‘Ideal’ and ‘Acceptable’ outcomes • Work back to identify definable and achievable milestones on a journey to these outcomes
Strategy into tactics and predicting pitfalls • Tactics must be aligned to deliver your strategy and designed to reach different stakeholders • Identify triggers, opportunities and challenges • Need to invest more time and effort to achieve more ambitious outcomes (Think -> Feel -> Do) • Four to six tactics using different channels over time is ten times more likely to have lasting behavioural impact than repeating the same tactics or deploying multiple tactics for a short time • Spot the pits, so you don’t fall into them! • Identify ‘big turn offs’ for each stakeholder to avoid • Or tactics that could undermine your style and values
Triggers, opportunities and challenges • Triggers for effective tactics can be • Time-based (e.g. existing campaigns or seasonal) • Values-based (e.g. family or financial motivations) • Issues-based (things that matter most to that group) • Be clear which triggers are: • Opportunities (either existing or generated by you) • Challenges – but identified early and proactively dealt with, they can turn into opportunities • Apply this to your priority stakeholders and outcomes to identify potential triggers and tactics
Suggested way forwards • Following this, the PCC Comms Team should • ‘Fill in the blanks’ for other priority stakeholders • Produce a ‘term of office’ Comms Strategy • Finalise a 2013-14 Comms Delivery Plan • Draw on CCPED to help design, deliver and review • The Plan will set themes and phases, achieving milestones and outcomes set by the PCC • Continually review milestones and outcomes in-year • Re-run this session to review long-term priorities and set Comms Delivery Plan for 2014/15