220 likes | 362 Views
Future directions in Ground-Based Gamma-Ray Astronomy. Simon Swordy - TeV Particle Astro II, UW Madison, 2006. Discuss. Future of ground-based gamma-rays, postulate: "Where there's a will there's a way..". Will. Way. Some History. The Crab in early x-rays from a rocket flight. Also.
E N D
Future directions in Ground-Based Gamma-Ray Astronomy Simon Swordy - TeV Particle Astro II, UW Madison, 2006
Discuss.. Future of ground-based gamma-rays, postulate: "Where there's a will there's a way.."
Will Way
What happened next? Then Now Balloon/ x-rays >20keV still awaiting NuSTAR NASA/Explorer Rocket/ x-rays<10keV etc....
WHY did <10keV do so much better? The technology of x-ray mirrors as focusing optics could be used <10keV, (now also possible >20keV, hence NuSTAR) Low energy x-ray detectors could be built from silicon -> CCDs Low energy single photon resolution became sub arcsec The energy window ~20-100keV is only being more fully explored recently because modern detector technology in SWIFT has angular resolution ~17arcmin. (Coded mask and CdZnTe).
Ground-based gamma-ray astronomy will not be able get much better than ~5arcmin (for single gamma), so several objects will always seem close to point-like (e.g. Cass A, Tycho, Crab..) It cannot compete with optical, radio, soft x-ray in the detailed morphology of sources..... but it can provide a clear outline of the extreme non-thermal pieces of our Galaxy and beyond. So..... Will Way
"Easy" ways to go.. Make 'em bigger (increase to an array size of sqkm) Make 'em higher (go up a bigger mountain) "Tricky" ways to go... Lower energy threshold (going up a mountain helps, high QE devices help) Increase FOV for air cherenkov (some optical limits to this) Seemingly impossible stuff... Get better single photon angular resolution Increase live-time for air cherenkov
Some examples: S. Fegan, V. Vassiliev, UCLA "HE-ASTRO" concept • Array • 217 telescopes • 8 hexagonal rings + 1 • 80m separation • Telescope and Detector • ø10m equivalent • QE = 0.25 (Bialkali) • 15º field of view • Facts and Figures • Outer radius: 640m • Single cell area: 5543m2 • Total area: 1.06km2 Distance From Center Of Array [m] Distance From Center Of Array [m]
Observation Modes Current IACTAs Narrow field of view <0.01 km2 @ 40 GeV 0.05-0.1 km2 @ 100 GeV 0.2-0.3 km2 @ 10 TeV Field of view [πsr] Field of view [deg] Square KM Array Continuum of modes Trade area for solid angle Parallel mode Narrow field of view 1 km2 @ 40 GeV 2 km2 @ 100 GeV 4-5 km2 @ 10 TeV “Fly’s Eye” mode Wide field of view 0.02-0.03 km2 @ 40 GeV 0.1-0.2 km2 @ 100 GeV 3-4 km2 @ 10 TeV Collecting Area [km2]
New Info… HAWC or miniHAWC? (300m versus 150m baseline)
CTA - European Initiative (HESS+MAGIC) Hofmann: Array layout: 2-3 Zones High-energy section ~0.05% area coverage Medium-energy section ~1% area coverage Low-energy section ~10% area coverage FoV increasing to 8-10 degr. in outer sections 70 m 250 m few 1000 m Eth ~ 10-20 GeV Eth ~ 50-100 GeV Eth ~ 1-2 TeV
Option: Mix of telescope types Not to scale !
Sensitivity on Crab: Whipple 5/√hr Milagro ~8/√yr (wide angle) VERITAS-4, etc 23/√hr HAWC 7/√hr (wide angle) HE-ASTRO 23 /√hr (wide angle) HE-ASTRO 166 /√hr (sees Crab in 3s!)
Ground Gamma-Ray Timeline Whipple, HEGRA, CANGAROOII, Milagrito HESS, MAGIC VERITAS, CANGAROOIII, Milagro HESS2, MAGIC2 VERITAS2, CANGAROOIII+?, MiniHAWC CTA, HE-ASTRO, HAWC, +….
Some Ways Forward: • In principle, collection area can be increased ad infinitum. The collection area of present ACTs is defined by the light pool size. The detector becomes larger than the light pool above ~105m2. Future ACT arrays head toward >1km2 • Higher altitude sites help ACTs and ground arrays, probably >3000m (presently ~2000m). • Coverage of full sky is highly desirable -> north and south facilities. • Given expected world-wide resources (<$500M?) this will probably be a limit -> two observatories • All-sky monitoring capability at <0.1 Crab level seems essential. Possibly with a co-located HAWC-type detector, or with a single HE-ASTRO-type detector, or maybe something new. • The interested science community will probably grow significantly - we need to get our world-wide act together