280 likes | 423 Views
Fast and Slow Dynamics in Neural Networks with Small-World Connectivity. Sara A. Solla Northwestern University. With: Santiago Madruga, Hermann Riecke, Alex Roxin. Roxin, Riecke, Solla - Phys. Rev.Lett. 92 , 198101 (2004) Riecke, Roxin, Madruga, Solla - Chaos 17 , 026110 (2007).
E N D
Fast and Slow Dynamics in Neural Networks with Small-World Connectivity Sara A. Solla Northwestern University With: Santiago Madruga, Hermann Riecke, Alex Roxin Roxin, Riecke, Solla - Phys. Rev.Lett. 92, 198101 (2004) Riecke, Roxin, Madruga, Solla - Chaos 17, 026110 (2007)
Complex Networks: Form to Function To which extent does network topology determine or affect network function?
Model of NetworkConnectivity: a Small-World Network Many complex networks have a small-world topology characterized by dense local clustering or cliquishness of connections between neighboring nodes yet a short path length between any (distant) pair of nodes due to the existence of relatively few long-range connections. This is an attractive model for the organization of brain anatomical and functional networks because a small-world topology can support both segregated (specialized) and distributed (integrated) information processing. Bassett, Bullmore - The Neuroscientist 12, 512 (2006)
Small-World (SW) Brain Networks • Activity in hippocampal slices has been successfully modeled using SW networks of excitatory neurons that reproduce both bursts (CA3) and seizures (CA1) [Netoff, Clewley, Arno, Keck, White - J. Neurosci. 24, 8075 (2004)]. • Large-scale synchronization associated with epileptic seizures has been modeled using SW networks of Hindmarsh-Rose neurons [Percha, Szakpasu, Zochowski, Parent - Phys. Rev. E 72, 031909 (2005)]. • Small-world networks are increasingly being applied to the analysis of human functional networks derived from EEG, MEG, and fMRI experiments [Eguiluz, Chialvo, Cecchi, Baliki, Apkarian - Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 018012 (2005)]. • The aggregate system of neurons and glial cells can be viewed as a small-world • network of excitable cells [Sinha, Saramaki, Kaski - Rev. E 76, 015101 (2007)]. • A large-scale structural SW model of the dentate gyrus has been formulated and used to identify topological determinants of epileptogenesis [Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen, Santhakumar, Morgan, Huerta, Tsimring, Soltesz - J. Neurophysiol. 97, 1566 (2007)].
Dentate Gyrus: a Small-World Network Complex network topology: neither regular, nor random L : average path length C : clustering coefficient The average number of synapses between any two neurons in the dentate gyrus is less than three - similar to the average path length for the nervous system of C. Elegans, which has only 302 neurons as opposed to over one million! [Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen, Santhakumar, Morgan, Huerta, Tsimring, Soltesz - J. Neurophysiol. 97, 1566 (2007)]
Excitable Integrate-and-Fire Neurons Spikes are produced whenever: Followed by a reset: Excitable neurons if: <
Sustained Network Activity p=0 p=0.05
Sustained Network Activity p=0.05 p=0.15
Failure to Sustain Oscillations 100 0 Ensemble average over many network configurations with the same density p of shortcuts. Some of the configurations will sustain persistent oscillatory activity, while some will burst and fail. Is there a well defined transition for large networks?
Failure to Sustain Oscillations Failure involves the interaction of two time scales: 1)A cellular time scale associated with the timeTR needed for a neuron to recover to the point where a single synaptic input will make it fire: , where 2)A network time scale associated with the TN (p) for the first return of activity in a small-world network: [Newman, Moore, Watts - Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 3201 (2000)]
Transition to Failure The failure transition occurs at a size-dependent critical density of shortcuts, determined by the condition The critical density pcr scales with the logarithm of the size N of the system.
Sustained Oscillations: Backbone Pathway Backbone neurons shown in red; N=1000, p=0.10, and TR = 2.494.
Sustained Oscillations: Attractors Oscillatory solutions characterized by their period, their mean firing rate, and the standard deviation of their firing rate. N=1000, p=0.05, D= 0.10 Number of attractors vs N
Fast Waves: D=0.10 p= 0.01, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, from (a) to (f)
Slow Waves: D= 0.16 p= 0.01, 0.20, 0.40, 1.00, from (a) to (d) Activity in (d) is noisy and exhibits synchronized population spikes
Slow Waves: Increasing D D= 0.06, 0.08, 0.10, 0.12, 0.14, 0.16, 0.18
Reentrant Network Activity: p = 0.8 D= 0.16
Reentrant Network Activity: p = 1.0 D= 0.16
Chaotic Neural Activity N=1000, D= 0.16 Dashed vertical line indicates TR, the minimum value of the interspike interval (ISI) if neurons receive only one input per cycle. As p increases, an increasing number of neurons exhibit ISIs below TR. These ‘faster’ neurons receive multiple inputs via shortcuts, and they sustain network activity while the `slower’ neurons recover.
Chaotic Neural Activity Temporal complexity of activity patterns in chaotic regime. N=1000,D= 0.18 Lifetime of chaotic activity: stretched exponentials. p=1, D= 0.18 andD= 0.165
Summary • Small-world networks of excitable neurons are capable of supporting sustained activity. This activity is sparse and oscillatory, and it does not require excitatory-inhibitory interactions. • A transition to failure occurs with increasing density of shortcuts. Below the failure transition, the number of attractors increases at least linearly with the size N of the system. A connectivity backbone can be associated with each attractor. • Above the transition, the network dynamics exhibit exceedingly long chaotic transients; failure times follow a stretched exponential distribution. Periods of low activity are mediated by `early firing’ neurons that receive more than one shortcut input. This chaotic activity does not require a balanced excitatory-inhibitory network. CONNECTIVITY MATTERS!!!