290 likes | 428 Views
Construction and technical aspects of Brownfield Regeneration. Barbara Vojvodíková, Filip Khestl, Tereza Murínová.
E N D
Construction and technical aspects of Brownfield Regeneration Barbara Vojvodíková, Filip Khestl, Tereza Murínová „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.“
Awareness • Which technical aspects we should pay attention to? • What can be read upfrom various map data and why it is necessary to know it? • Which information we need to get for objects on brownfields and why? • Why we have to pay attention to the ownership structure?
Goals of the teaching unit • Present various technical aspects of regeneration • Explain what can be encountered on a brownfield site • Explain how to mitigate risk of unpleasant surprises by choosing the right approach • Which types of objects we may find on brownfields • How to can we assess or diagnose them • What is potential future utilization of these sites
Content • What buildings can be found on brownfield sites • What information we should collect to get a complete view of a site. • Construction types and their diagnostics • Why it is important to consider ownership issues
Types of buildings on brownfields • Office buildings • Production plants and factory buildings • Special buildings - heating plant, waste water treatmentplant... • Towers and chimneys • Roads and railway siding • Networks - sewerage, electricity, water ...
Office building – coal mine Odra– Ostrava (CZ) 2004 2010 Photos by B. Vojvodíková
Office building – coal mine HeřmaniceOstrava (CZ) 2001 2010 Photos by B. Vojvodíková
Production halls and buildings Figure 1 Ostrava Trojice valley -2001 Figure 2 – Ostrava – Přívoz, CZ - 2004 Figure 3- Volos, Greek - 2000 Photos by B. Vojvodíková
Towers and chimneys Figure 1- Bismarc. Gelsenkirchen Germany 2011 Figure 3 – Zlaté Hory - CZ 2011 Figure 2 – Alexander, Ostrava. CZ- 2011 Photos by B. Vojvodíková
Pros and cons of keeping a dominant object on a site Pros (+) • Object which is architectonically interesting can serve as a symbol of the place • Tourist attraction • Landmark Cons (-) • Expensive maintenance • Difficult to find meaningful reuse
Roads and railway siding Figure 1 – Třinec steelworks, CZ, 2011 Area of former railway Figure 2 - Vitkovice steelworks, CZ, 2009 Photos by B. Vojvodíková
Networks - sewerage, electricity, water Figure 1 - Schwartze Pumpe, Germany - 2011 Photo by B. Vojvodíková Figure 2 - Horní Suchá, CZ, 2008 Photos by J. Lipner
What should be assessed to get enough information about a site (1) General maps • Historical maps • Town plan, local map • Plan of distribution networks and grids • Land-use limits scheme, Flood plans • GIS resources, Ortophoto maps • Cadastral map
Significance of cadastral map for identification of ownershipOwners of former coal mine Heřmanice Picture byJ. Novosák
What should be assessed to get enough information about a site (2) Specific maps • Map of rainfall (rainfall – runoff relationships) • Culmination flow rates of nearby streams • Nearby boreholes and their interpretation • Environmental audits.
Information to seek about objects (1) General information – focused on construction • Details about the construction of the object • Project documentation • Foundation bearing capacity • Disposition, dimensions, spans – gaps • Materials used • Building services, distribution networks. Cultural and historical technical heritage
Further information lowering the risk of unpleasant surprises Record of usage • Ways of use, processes, modes of productions, technologies used • Volumes, frequencies • Used substances • Changes in use, end of use (dates) • Accidents, emergencies, sudden deaths, fires, leaks.
Absolutely essential part of evaluation potential for future use Information from the site • Walk over • Site visit – assessment of the situation • State of vegetation, animals, colours, smells • Every photograph available • Communication with (former) employees, employers, neighbours, witnesses • Quality of water in nearby wells.
Assessment of building constructions RULE NO.1: • Existing older building should always be supposed that its state is worse than it looks at first glance. • This opinion we can change only on the basis of assessment results.
Examples of old constructions (even this can be a brownfield) Old church in Ústí nad Labem Předlice – CZ- 2012 Photos by B. Vojvodíková
Examples of old constructions interior Old castle – Český Rudolec- CZ - 2011 exterior Photos by B. Vojvodíková
Diagnostic methods Diagnostics is carried out using destructive or non-destructive methods • Destructive methods • impact on construction • precise methods • (compactness characteristics, cut probes, etc.) Photos by F. Khestl
Diagnostic methods • Non-destructive methods • None or only minimal construction damage • Less precise methods, it is necessary to precise them by destructive methods (correlation coefficient) • Recommended for objects of historical value • (visual methods, firmness measuring, electric, radiation or electromagnetic methods, tensometric tests)
Ultrasonic impulse method Sound relay measurementon constructions (propagation speed is being measured) Photo by F. Khestl
Demolition Positive effects • it removes the stigma of past use; • it reduces the structural risks; • it reduces contamination risks; • it may help speed up the development process; • it may prove to be more cost effective (cheaper then a complex reconstruction); • it may produce higher development values for the site
Demolition Negative effects: • it uproots the historical connections of the location; • it is a costly process, especially where there is a large amount of material to be dumped; • it is a less sustainable option regarding material use or reuse (material is carried away and new materials need to be brought on to the site); • it is a less sustainable with regard to transport; • there are increased accident risks to workers and the public.
Why it is necessary to pay attention toownership • Single ownership is usually the most favourable situation. • Usually with an increased number of owners the chance for successful reclamation decreases. • Shared development objectives are very difficult to realize in the case of a complicated ownership structure.
Conclusions • Before start of the planning projects on brownfields an assessment has to be made. • Various building types represent various risks for their future use • It is necessary to take into account state of existing constructions and make rational decission about their eventual demolition • Special attention has to be paid to ownership issues
Thank you for your attention http://browntrans.vsb.cz „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.“