Download
1 / 33
370 likes | 835 Views
A Framework of Course Development Processes. English 6010 Week 4. Framework Components. Needs Assessment Determining Goals and Objectives Conceptualizing Context Selecting and Developing Materials and Activities Evaluation Consideration of Resources and Constraints. Needs Assessment.
E N D
A Framework of Course Development Processes English 6010 Week 4
Framework Components • Needs Assessment • Determining Goals and Objectives • Conceptualizing Context • Selecting and Developing Materials and Activities • Evaluation • Consideration of Resources and Constraints
Needs Assessment • Objective needs • use of language in real-life communication • current proficiency level • Subjective needs • cognitive and affective needs of the learner in the learning situation (personality, confidence, attitudes, expectations with regard to the learning of English) • individual cognitive style and learning strategies
Assessing subjective needs • Student’s attitudes toward • the target language and culture • Learning • themselves as learners • purposes for studying the language • preferences with respect to how they will learn • If subjective needs are not taken into account, then objective needs may not be met
When does one conduct a needs assessment? • Depending on the context, needs assessment can be conducted in: • Stage 1- the planning stage • Stage 2- the teaching stage • Stage 3- the replanning stage
How does one conduct a needs assessment? • Questionnaires (common) • Interviews with students and others (I.e., professors, administrators) • Observation and participation in situations in which the students will use English • Tests and interviews that measure proficiency to determine what students already know (diagnostic exam, Michigan Test for example or your own diagnostic exam or pre-assessment technique)
Target and learning needs • Target need • what the learner needs to do in the target situation (participate in job interview) • Learning need • what the learner needs in order to learn (specific vocabulary, structure, knowledge of register)
Issues • Needs assessment is not a value-free process • It is influenced by • the teacher’s view of what the course is about • the institutional constraints • the students’ perception of what is being asked of them • Needs assessment should be evaluated and it should be viewed as an ongoing process, both in its development and in its use
Determining Goals and Objectives • Goals: overall, long-term purposes of the course. • destination of the course • purposes and intended outcomes of the course (backward design, thinking about outcome first) • Objectives: express the specific ways in which goals will be achieved. • represent the various points that chart the course toward the destination (What will my students need to do in order to achieve these goals? For instance, “Students will be able to identify the main idea”, “students will be able to write a thesis statement”)
How do we determine goals? • Students’ needs assessment • The policies of the institution • The way the teacher conceptualizes the context • Proficiency levels • Goals-cognitive (master of linguistic and cultural knowledge) affective (motivation, positive attitude) transfer (learning how to learn and transfer to another context)
Bloom’s Taxonomy for Developing Clear Objectives BLOOMtaxonomy.doc
Types of Objectives according to Graves • Coverage objectives • Activity objectives • Involvement objectives • Mastery objectives • Critical thinking objectives
Issues • Many teachers do not formulate goals and objectives at all or do so only after having thought about what they will teach and how. • Although one may establish very clear goals and objectives, once we teach a course we revisit those goals and objectives and then they may become clear to us. (re-planning stage) • Goals and objectives are a statement of intent, subject to reexamination and change once the course is under way. (maybe the strategies you plan to use are not working for your students and you may need to reconsider half way through the course, this is part of the ongoing reflection process )
Structural syllabus • Top down approach to develop a syllabus • the institution or you as a teacher has already determined what the learning outcomes will be and the specific skills (writing, reading, speaking, listening) that students are expected to master at the end of the course • usually involves grammatical rules of the language being taught, for example nouns, verbs, adjectives, statements, questions, subordinate clauses (English 3101/3102)
Notional-functional syllabus • content of the language teaching is a collection of the function being performed when the language is used, or of the notions the language is used to express. • Examples of functions include: informing, agreeing, apologizing, requesting. • Examples of notion include: size, age, color, comparison, time, and so on.
A situational syllabus • The content of language teaching is a collection of real or imaginary situations in which language occurs or is used. A situation usually involves several participants who are engaged in some activity in a specific setting. The language occurring in a situation involves a number of functions, combined into a plausible segment of discourse. The purpose is to use the language that is used in a specific situation. For instance, seeing the dentist, going to a restaurant, complaining to the landlord, and so on.
A skill-based syllabus • content of the language teaching is a collection of specific abilities that may play a part in using language. This type of syllabus group linguistic competences (pronunciation, vocabulary, grammar, and discourse) together into generalized types of behavior, such as listening, to spoken language for main idea, giving effective oral presentations, and so on.
A task-based syllabus • The content of the teaching is a series of complex purposeful tasks that the students want or need to perform with the language they are learning. Task based differs from situation-based teaching in that while situational teaching has the goal of teaching the specific language content that occurs in the situation, task-based has the goal of teaching students to draw on resources to complete some piece of work (applying for a job, getting housing information over the phone)
A content-based syllabus • The subject matter is primary, and language learning occurs incidentally to the content learning. The content teaching is not organized around language learning, but vice-versa. An example is a science class taught in English in a Spanish speaking context (an immersion or bilingual curriculum may use such syllabus)
Negotiated Syllabus • You may have ask your students to evaluate the syllabus and then ask them if there is anything else that should be included based on their expectations of the course • You could also negotiate the readings depending on your constraints • You could have students help design the syllabus or design it after the initial needs analysis
Syllabus cont’d • Remember you need to provide also for students with disabilities and very specific guidelines and policies about homework, grading policy, attendance policy, quizzes, and behavior policies as well • Provide a tentative schedule with readings and dates. This may vary, but it will give the students a clear idea of what to expect.
Selecting and developing materials and activities • Organization of content and activities- two principles are “building and recycling.” • Building from the simple to the complex, for instance to learn how to write a narrative before writing an argumentative essay. In a basic course, learning main idea before providing an opinion or critique of a reading.
Recycling- students encounter previous materials in new ways. For instance, an individual reading activity maybe recycled in a role play activity with other students.
Organization of Content and Activities • Two approaches to organize a course: • Cycle- for instance, you organize it by dividing the class into sections-discussion, group work, writing (all thee activities may deal with reading comprehension) • Matrix- compiling a list of possible activities and then decide what to do depending on the students needs and availability of materials • Both approaches suggest a collection of core material to be learned and activities to be conducted within a specific time-frame.
Evaluation • How will you assess what students have learned? • Have they learned what you taught? Have they incidentally learned something else? (tests, self-reflections, student-teacher conference) • How will you assess the effectiveness of the course? • Was the course effective? Where did it fall short? (students’ evaluation of the course, teachers’ self-evaluation, peer-observation)
Consideration of Resources and Constraints • Class-size • Technology • Classrooms • Materials • Time • Institutional philosophy • Language policies • curriculum
A Cautionary Word on Course Development • The components discussed by Graves (1996) should notserve as a checklist for the teacher but rather as a set of tools for understanding and directing the process of course development. • Each component is one way of working with the whole.
Categorizing techniques • From manipulation to communication • Mechanical, meaningful, and communicative drills • Controlled to free techniques • For the difference between manipulative (controlled) and communicative (free) techniques see Brown (2001) page 133 • For a complete taxonomy of language techniques see Brown (2001) pages 134-135
Textbooks • Deciding to prepare your own materials as opposed to using a textbook • Teachers’ guide are a good resource • Literacy and alternative contexts • Posters, charts, magazines • Comic books and comic strips, graphic novels • Movies, documentaries, videogames
Technology • The use of language labs • Audio-books • Personal computers • Grammar exercises online • Audiotapes (recording journal entries, listening activities) • Overhead projection • Videogames (yes, we can learn from them as well)
CALL • Collaborative projects- data analysis, webpage design • Peer editing of compositions- online (webCT) • Class forum • Emails • Blogs • Online portfolios
Critically examine a syllabus • Does it have clear goals appropriate for the course level? • Are the objectives clear? • Can you point at specific assessment measures for each objective? • What kind of syllabus is this? Is it structural, functional? • Do you see a particular theoretical framework in the design of this syllabus (behaviorist, cognitive, constructivist) or is it a combination of more than one? Exchange your ideas/comments/analysis in small groups.
