World Food Prize International Symposium

1. World Food Prize International Symposium October 12 – 14, 2005 NASULGC Food and Society Initiative Mortimer H. Neufville

2. Food and Society Project Objectives 1.To develop a strategic plan to increase public and federal support within NASULGC institutions for research and extension programs related to A. Food and wellness B.Food and sustainable communities C.   Food and global economic development

3. 2. Developing partnerships within organizations, agencies, and institutions that reflect the relationship of food and agriculture to human wellness, environment, science, technology and education, sustainable communities, and global economic development. Food and Society Project Objectives

4. 3.Convene effective forums to foster dialogue between stakeholders and decision makers to increase their awareness of the need for greater support for food and agriculture. 4.Recommend appropriate education, advocacy, organization and strategy, to pass legislation and obtain increased funding. Food and Society Project Objectives

5. Research Priorities A. Food and health 1. Diet and health 2.Diet and chronic diseases 3. Obesity

6. Research Priorities B.Food and global environment 1. Adaptive ecosystems management 2. Genomics 3. Water C. Food safety and nutrition 1.Food and globalization 2. Conflict resolution and national security

7. National Academy of Sciences national dialogue on food and its relationship to health, the environment and globalization. The academies worked with NASULGC to bring together NIH, NSF, HHS, USDA and university scientists to discuss the issues and identify the priorities. The conference was held in MAY 2004 entitled “Exploring a vision, integrating knowledge, food and health.”

8. The participants identified the problem areas of food and its relationship to a healthy society and they are obesity, diabetes, chronic diseases, as well as food safety and biosecurity.

9. It was suggested that the Office of Science and Technology Policy 1. Bring together the relevant agencies in a multiagency effort to address the problems and 2. The government must declare obesity as a national priority and it must be part of the agenda of a national task force established to implement recommendations that will address all aspects of this chronic ailment.

10. NASULGC and USDA recommendations relating to research and education to address the problem of childhood obesity. 1. Community building 2. Diet and exercise 3. Diet, nutrition and health

11. USDA advisory committee to look at funding for food and agricultural sciences research, chaired by Dr. William Danforth recommended the creation of a National Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA) with eight priorities, one of which was obesity. In the FY 2006 appropriations language the senate indicated that further study of Federal funding for food and agricultural sciences, research and education, should be conducted by NSF. This will have a significant impact on future funding and could be an avenue for us to launch a major obesity, diet, nutrition, and health initiative.

12. An Agenda for the Future 1.Enhancing research programs that advance the research questions posed by scholars around the comprehensive nature of overweight and obesity among youth 2. Identifying promising practices and evaluation models to be promoted by USDA and other government agencies that can reduce overweight and obesity 3. Developing a coordinated policy recommendation at the Federal, state and local levels for education that support the reduction of overweight and obesity among youth.

13. The Land Grant University System 1.Ensuring the integration of knowledge-based programming into youth, family, and community extension programs that address the issue of overweight and obese youth. 2.Conducting pilot studies and program evaluations that contribute to the development of policy recommendations at the local, state, and national levels. 3. Strengthening undergraduate and graduate programs in the integration of nutrition and health.

14. The Land Grant University System 4. Identifying best practices in higher education that prepare the practitioner-scholar for work in community based prevention programming in youth overweight and obesity. 5. Working closely with local communities to identify and evaluate promising practices which encourage healthy lifestyle and healthy weight for youth.

15. Next Steps 1. Collating the best practices that we have identified 2. Having a repository website for these best practices 3. Networking with our stakeholders 4. Marketing what we and our various constituents have done 5. Determine the research gaps and agree on solution interventions

16. Education and extension should be engaged in programs relating to: 1.Community planning 2.Exercise in the workplace and at home 3.Community development 4.Classroom initiatives 5.Enhancing the learning environment 6.Nutrition education 7.Food consumption 8. Developing incentive and reward programs for building constituencies

17. Recommendations 1. University presidents should be asked to play a critical leadership role in articulating the role of land-grant university research, education, and extension in addressing the obesity epidemic, championing the need for increased funding, and promoting greater visibility for faculty in advancing new knowledge and determining best practices.

18. Recommendations 2.  The Farm Bill should be utilized of affirm USDA's role in obesity prevention and to assure for adequate funding to address research gaps, conduct program evaluation, and train land-grant faculty members to address this major health issue. 3.  There is an immediate need to identify and share best practices in Extension and outreach related to nutrition education that leads to healthy lifestyles and prevents obesity.

19. Recommendations 4.  Cooperative Extension should make a commitment to bring the total resources of agriculture, youth development, family consumer sciences, nutrition, and community resource development together to address the obesity epidemic with a holistic programmatic agenda. 5.  Degree programs, professional preparation, and service learning opportunities for university students need to be adapted to produce a cadre of professionals trained to address complex health issues such as obesity.

20. Recommendations 6.  Land-grant universities should assume leadership for the coordination of community-based wellness initiatives that influence the adoption and implementation of best practices for all citizens, i.e. the establishment and implementation of school wellness plans, community asset mapping, etc.  7.  An eXtension community of practice should be developed to place the land-grant university system in a visible leadership position regarding healthy lifestyles including healthy weight and utilize innovative technology to reach the American public.

21. Recommendations 8.  Land-grant universities should provide leadership for public policy education that prepares families, practitioners, and community leaders to exert influence on policy development at the federal, state, and local levels

22. TAKE HOME MESSAGES FOR ACTION Adopt the slogan • Childhood Obesity Prevention (Healthy Weight, for Healthy Lifestyle) To achieve this requires: • Sustained efforts in research and intervention. Phased efforts may provide more meaningful results and change. • Community-based multidimensional efforts of shared responsibility

23. TAKE HOME MESSAGES FOR ACTION • High quality interventions that achieve impacts receive more visibility and resources for replication. • The National Land-Grant System and its partners should identify gaps in research, education and extension and reorient priorities to these areas. • Professional preparation at all levels, including informal continuing education and emphasize a research/practitioner model to effectively deal with obesity.