Notation for Arguments

1. Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U

2. Sequent Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U Sequent Notation: S>T, T>U | S>U

3. Sequent Notation for Arguments Vertical Notation: S>T T>U S>U Sequent Notation: S>T, T>U | S>U

4. Translating Arguments Ifthe Bible is REVELATION thenit will WITHSTAND attack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation.

5. Translating Arguments Ifthe Bible is REVELATION thenit will WITHSTAND attack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation. If R then W. W. So R.

6. Translating Arguments Ifthe Bible is REVELATION thenit will WITHSTAND attack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation. If R then W. W. So R. If R then W, W | R

7. Translating Arguments Ifthe Bible is REVELATION thenit will WITHSTAND attack. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation. If R then W. W. So R. If R then W, W | R R>W, W | R

8. Translating Arguments Ifthe Bible is REVELATION thenit will WITHSTAND attack.. It does withstand attack. So it is revelation. If R then W. W. So R. Sequent Notation: R>W, W | R Vertical Notation: R>W W R

9. Translating Arguments Which sentence is the conclusion? Premise Indicators: Since Because For : Conclusion Indicators: So Therefore Hence Thus Consequently :

10. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza.

11. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. Pbecause I. I results in P.

12. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. Pbecause I. I results in P. P> I

13. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. Pbecause I. I results in P. P> I WRONG! ‘Because’ Indicates a PREMISE!

14. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. Pbecause I. I results in P. Conclusion Premise

15. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. Pbecause I. I results in P. I, I results in P | P Conclusion Premise

16. Translating Arguments Papa John’s is better PIZZA because they use better INGREDIENTS. Better ingredients results in better pizza. Pbecause I. I results in P. I, I results in P | P I, I>P | P Conclusion Premise

17. Translating Arguments Don’t confuse antecedent indicators with premise indicators.

18. Translating Arguments Don’t confuse antecedent indicators with premise indicators. The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE. E if C. C>E

19. Translating Arguments Don’t confuse antecedent indicators with premise indicators. The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE. E if C. C>E The moon is EDIBLEbecause it is made of CHEESE. Ebecause C.

20. Conclusion Premise Translating Arguments Don’t confuse antecedent indicators with premise indicators. The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE. E if C. C>E The moon is EDIBLEbecause it is made of CHEESE. Ebecause C.

21. Conclusion Premise Translating Arguments Don’t confuse antecedent indicators with premise indicators. The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE. E if C. C>E The moon is EDIBLEbecause it is made of CHEESE. Ebecause C. C | E

22. Conclusion Premise Translating Arguments Why > is different from |. The moon is EDIBLE if it is made of CHEESE. E if C. C>E The moon is EDIBLEbecause it is made of CHEESE. Ebecause C. C | E Click here for more