150 likes | 256 Views
November 3, 2005 F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, C. Roda G. Usai, I. Vivarelli, G. Volpi. Performance of linear fit. Performance of linear fit.
E N D
November 3, 2005 F. Crescioli, M. Dell'Orso, G. Punzi, C. Roda G. Usai, I. Vivarelli, G. Volpi Performance of linear fit
Performance of linear fit • Main update during summer concerns study on 3D reconstruction of tracks using old 2D sectorization and the new 3D sectorization with granularity in eta-phi. • Started since few day a massive production of data with a custom generation for FTK: • Impact Parameter (d) distribution uniform from 0-2 mm • Uniform in 1/Et with Et>1 GeV
3D Sectors • Sector in FTK nomenclature is a combination of modules, one per plane, created in the same way of patterns.Each sector have a set of constants • In 2D sectors the modules have only two ID: plane and phi ID.Main division for interval of phi. • A 3D sector is composed of pieces with different phi ID and eta IDMain division for interval in phi and eta.
Curvature, phi and d • No difference from results showed in July. Impact parameter training is not completed. We must wait the end of new data production,
Longitudinal parameters 2D Sectors • Reconstruction of cot(theta) and z0 is possible with the 2D sectorization. • Appear some not-linearity effects.
Longitudinal parameters 2D Sectors • Z0 reconstruction show a loss of resolution as function of cot(theta) of tracks
Longitudinal parameters 3D Sectors • The 3D sectorization permit a good reconstruction of cot(theta) and z0 parameters of tracks Resolution in cot(theta) reconstruction is comparable with off-line; appears some non-linearity effects that need more studies.
Longitudinal parameters Z0 reconstruction have a resolution of 10% worse than off-line but don't show not linearity effects.
Parameters reconstruction • Transverse plane parameters (Curvature, d and phi) don't have improvement from the 3D sectorization. • Longitudinal parameters can be reconstructed better using 3D sectorization.
3D vs 2D • 2D sectorization have ~400 sectors: • Can reconstructs with a resolution near to the off-line 3 parameters (d, phi, 1/Pt) • 3D sectorization have 150k sectors (prediction): • Can well reconstructs 5 parameters (d, phi, 1/Pt, cot(theta), z0) In 2D reconstruction are used 7 geometrical constants for any sector and any parameters, 13 geometrical constants in 3D reconstruction Summary of performances (ftk resolution over offline res) par. 2D 3D curv: 1.6 1.6 phi: 1 1 d: .7(*) .7(*) z0: 4.5 1.1 cot(theta): 2.5 1 * training not completed
New MC samples production • New production characteristics are: • Uniform distribution on impact parameter, with greater beam spot than previous to complete the training • Uniform distribution on curvature • Pt threshold 1 GeV/c instead 6 GeV/c, to have a better training on soft tracks.
New MC samples production • Flat in 1/pt (curvature) • Flat in angle • Flat in Impact Parameter
New MC samples production • Flat in eta • Gaussian distribution in Z0 With this production we will complete the training of constants used by linear fit for all parameters.
Goals of the new MC samples and Time Table • New production need, using lxbatch, 2 days for 100k events job; we can run about 30 jobs at same time. • With 10M events, ready in very few days, we will renew the old study adding training for impact parameter. • With 100M events, approximatively one month, we think to complete patterns studies at full resolution.
Goals of the new MC samples and Time Table • The chain used for training proposal integrates FtkSimWrap module and can be easily modified to product data file with the format of FTKSim. • Some updates on this production, and in future some documents for the use of FTKSimWrap in Athena, are contained at: http://fcdfhome.fnal.gov/usr/volpig/ftk/training.html