570 likes | 742 Views
Game Design Confessional. Dan Teasdale Senior Designer Pandemic Studios. What’s this session about?. “Why don’t you talk about all the mistakes you’ve made” Designers make mistakes …but never actually admit it I am a designer Dan’s Seven Deadly Design Sins
E N D
Game Design Confessional Dan Teasdale Senior Designer Pandemic Studios
What’s this session about? • “Why don’t you talk about all the mistakes you’ve made” • Designers make mistakes • …but never actually admit it • I am a designer • Dan’s Seven Deadly Design Sins • This speech isn’t about me telling you how to do your job
Gluttony, Part 1 I actually have 9 sins to confess, not 7
Pride, Part 1 I have had a stereotypical designer ego
The evidence against me? • I thought my ideas were best • I thought the rest of the team were ‘out of touch’ • I was a Nintendo Fanboy • I cringe when academics who’ve never worked on a game lecture about Game Design • I never confessed to my sins
Now that I’ve alienated half the room and made the other half think I’m an asshole, lets move on…
Anger I’ve been angry at the rest of the team for not reading my detailed and well-thought out design documents and specifications
Why weren’t they reading your documents? • Because they were huge! • …or they were, just only once
And did getting angry help? • Nope – people still didn’t read my docs • Half the time, ended up ignoring the docs and implementing something wildly different
So, how have you tried to resolve this? • HTML? • Nobody knows when it’s updated • Small Word Docs? • Nobody knows where they live • Design Site/CMS? • Hard to update • Wiki? • Solves these problems internally, not so good externally
What did you learn from all this, my child? • Nobody likes reading stuff twice • Most people only want to know the main jist behind the game, and detailed specs when they have to work directly on something • It’s a pain in the ass to update, collate, and view reference content in HTML or Word
Have I repented? • No. Not ideal, still stuff that needs to be done next project, like making Word-like output
Pride, Part 2 I have designed “Think like the Designer” missions
Blasphemy 1: Leading the Player • DAH Prototype: “Hypnotize Joe”,”Abduct Joe(x3)”, “Abuct a Car (x4)”,“Blow up the Police Station”, “Level City Hall” • BORING and FRUSTRATING • Tell the player WHY they’re doing this! • Designing for broader goals not only removes the tedium of “Why am I doing this” but also allows players to complete them their way • See Rockstar North!
Blasphemy 2: Timers as a crutch • “It Came From the Basement!” - What, my mission isn’t fun? Add a timer. • I couldn’t play Pikmin because of this • Use your mechanics! • If you want to use time as a mechanic, at least make it related to what you’re doing • See Rockstar North (for a bad example)
Blasphemy 3: Escort Missions • DAH: “Protect Scientist Joe as he walks calmy through eight lines of cops and soldiers to a panel with a button you could press yourself” • On paper, it sounds good. In reality, too many out-of-player-control fail conditions • Escort missions are obfuscated timers that can fail randomly.
What made you blaspheme like this? • Laziness? • Don’t take a step back? • Didn’t follow the Magic 400 Rules of Design That Don’t Exist? • …well, a little of all
Did you feel the weight of this mistake, my child? • On AMRTS, the mission in question was flip-flopping on balance right up to release • On DAH, it meant I got a lot of angry emails from people who thought I was a sucky designer • Still didn’t stop me from bitching about the same things in other games
Have I repented? • Yes, to the point where I’m annoying the other designers.
Envy I’ve always been envious of people who have a fresh perspective when playing my game
Why is this such a bad thing? • You lose sight of what the game is • Oddballs - goal had 5 layers of indirection • Created these layers over time, didn’t realise it.
The fallout? • Figured out a plan to resolve it • Cancelled before we could implement it
How should I approach this in the future? • Pretty much impossible to ignore 18 months of experience when evaluating your own game • Next best thing is to think about how people think
Well, how do people think? • Perceptual Control Theory • Dryest bit of this speech, but also probably the most base-level in terms of player interaction • If you want to take a quick nap, now’s the time
Perceptual Control Theory • Originally theorised in the 50’s as a way to explain human and animal behavior • The core concept of PCT is that every action we take is to reduce ‘error’ • Components that make up PCT are Perception and Reference
When your reference is the same as your perception… • Everything is fine and happy • Basically a ‘non-event’, no need to change anything • Example: My reference for this audience was 90% male gaming nerds • Perception meets Reference, wasn’t shocked when I saw you all
When your reference is different to your perception • Brain goes into an infinite loop • Creates Error - can be externalised as stress, angst, hate, controller throwing • The error persists until either • Your reference changes to meet your perception • You act to change your perception to meet your reference
An example? • Metal Gear Solid 2 • At the start, your perception meets your reference for a sequel to MGS • An hour later, your perception is changed dramatically and is different from your reference, thanks to Raiden • Good example of how error can be good and bad!
Have I repented? • Totally • If I’d done this on Oddballs, you’d be playing it now • Perception/Reference externalisation works for determining pretty much all human behavior
Gluttony, part 2 I have Knee-Jerk designed
What do you mean, ‘Knee-Jerk’ designed? • That is, I’ve designed something or extended something purely because of an external issue • No - Bad, Lazy • …and bites you in the ass in the long run
Example 1: DAH Conversation System • “A mission where you stop the mayor from giving a speech would be cool” • “It would be even cooler if you could give the speech” • Started out as a minigame for a single mission
DAH Conversation System • “Dan, you’re awesome and we love you. Lets use it in all the missions” • Then extended as a mechanic across a number of missions, not just speech delivery
DAH Conversation System • Thought System was pretty shallow • “Thoughts are really just for humor value at the moment, and they’re pointless otherwise. This is a problem. Let’s make it that Crypto says the thoughts that he finds in people’s brains!” • (cue sirens) • Then tied into core game mechanics
DAH Conversation System • After E3, took a few days break and looked back on what we had • Still had a mechanic suiting a minigame, but was used along the gameplay critical path • Didn’t hold up to the stress • Hunting down a particular person across a whole city just for their thought is ass boring. • Realised we had created a monster out of a small minigame setpiece due to knee-jerking.
DAH Conversation System • Took the benefits of this system, and slimmed it down • Convincing each person of “Good”,”Bad”,”Neutral” or “Instant Fail”. No grey areas • Removed dependence on finding thoughts • Humor delivery first, progression second • Back to “Really Fun!”, not “Critical Grinding”
Have I repented? • Yes - If I get to the point where I’m making radical changes, then think about it from the ground up.
Greed (and a little Sloth) I have created unoriginal concepts and worked on unoriginal games for money, fame, or out of laziness
Some people say that you’re to blame? • People always blame designers for being unoriginal • People usually after that pitch their own original ideas to me
What original ideas have been pitched to you? • From email: “It’d be a team-based FPS, but set in World War I!” • In person: “It’s a huge saga over thousands of years where you’d play death, then you’d control the reaper in a huge RTS that was also an FPS, then the reaper would impregnate your sister and you’d control the reapers babies. It’d also be a three part novel, and I wrote the outline already. Can you make my game for me?”
So, where have you committed this sin? • Attached to resume… • …Quake 2 weapons mod • “<game title> is a 3D RTS set in the fantasy world of <pre-established world>” • I worked on Army Men RTS
How are you going to stop this? • GO OUTSIDE! • You’re more likely to think of new ideas if you see new things • Pikmin arose from Miyamoto playing in his garden
So, you’ve repented, my son? • Sorta…it’s good to get ideas from other games • It’s easy to convey ideas as “It’s like the MGS Codec” or “It works like the GTA minimap” • So, referencing other game mechanics is good - just try to avoid ripping off entire games.
Sloth I’ve failed to prototype due to either not identifying the need, or because of schedule constraints
Sloth THIS IS EVIL!
Where did you blaspheme like this!? • DAH Redesign • Started off on right track, prototyped an 80% UFO, 20% Alien game
Where did you blaspheme like this!? • Fun UFO mode, not-so-fun Alien Mode • THQ and US Office had a reference for 80% Alien, 20% UFO • Came up with redesign for Alien Mode, didn’t prototype
Did you feel a just punishment for your actions? • Lost six months of design time prototyping on the fly (although it timed well because of it) • Generated a lot of resentment amongst other team members (“What’s the game?!”) • Had to start production still looking for the “30 seconds of fun” for alien mode • Disclaimer: Alien Mode is fun now. Please buy lots of copies of DAH