160 likes | 170 Views
The Effect of Personality Variables on the Ability to Deceive. Sarah Vogt Hanover College. Research Question. Are people with certain personality characteristics better able to deceive?. Personality Variables: Symptoms of Psychopathy.
E N D
The Effect of Personality Variables on the Ability to Deceive Sarah Vogt Hanover College
Research Question Are people with certain personality characteristics better able to deceive?
Personality Variables: Symptoms of Psychopathy Why are they related to deception?Those with psychopathic symptoms are often compulsive liars and manipulators What is it? Robert Hare (1999): Key Symptoms of Psychopathy: • Interpersonal: superficiality and lack of empathy • Social Deviance: impulsivity and the need for excitement • Focused on symptoms instead of psychopathy as a general concept--there are many contributing personality variables
Research on Deception • Ekman & Friesen (1974): suppressing anxiety when lying in one channel (e.g., voice) can cause it to “leak” through another channel (e.g., face): “nonverbal leakage”= poor deception • Female nurses saw 2 videos (1 pleasant, 1 unpleasant): told to act as if they were watching both pleasant • Result: more anxiety during unpleasant clip • Similar to my study: Method for measuring nonverbal leakage using exposure to video clips rather than lying—need reason to feel anxious
Procedure Overview • Informed Consent • Complete questionnaire or watch clips (eliminate order effects) • Debriefing and Permission
Participants • Young men and women (N = 21), aged 18-31 • 5 men, 16 women • All were Caucasian
Measuring Symptoms of Psychopathy(“Attitude Assessment”) • Based on Hare’s (1999) Psychopathy Checklist--10 symptoms measured, 3-6 questions for each symptom (Likert Scale-based) • Lack of Guilt: “When I know I have done wrong, I feel really bad inside.” (r) • Willingness to Manipulate: “I can get myself out of trouble easily and feel okay about it.”
The Participant’s Task Red Dragon (unpleasant) • 11 video clips • Clips unpleasant (horror) and pleasant/neutral (other films). • Instructed to conceal emotion as if watching all pleasant/neutral clips (Ekman & Friesen, 1974) • Face was videotaped • Permission granted to record video and use in presentation Sideways (pleasant)
Detecting Deception • Clips for each participant reassembled in random order • Nonverbal leakage score for each clip: • 0 = no nonverbal leakage • 1 = some nonverbal leakage • 2 = significant nonverbal leakage
Measuring Deception • Measured departure from neutral/positive reaction (0, 1, 2): level of “nonverbal leakage” • Were instructed to maintain neutral/positive reaction (typical leakage = fear, disgust) • Lower overall nonverbal leakage score = hypothesized to be the better deceivers • Ran dependent t-test between ratings for pleasant and unpleasant films: very accurate at t(20) = 8.07, p = 2.17 x 10-7
Results: Deception and Lack of Guilt r(21) = -0.476, p = .029
Results: Deception and Willingness to Manipulate r(21) = -0.493, p =.023
Other Results • All other psychopathy symptoms not correlatedwith nonverbal leakage: Egocentricity: r = -.04, p = .87 Superficiality: r = -.22, p = .38 Lack of empathy: r = -.32, p = .18 Impulsivity: r = -.05, p = .85 Need for excitement: r = -.30, p = .20 Lack of responsibility: r = -.18, p = .46 Early behavior problems: r = -.26, p = .28 Adult antisocial behavior: r = -.02, p = .93
Discussion/Limitations • There were personality traits related to the ability to deceive: lack of guilt and willingness to manipulate • Lack guilt (do not feel guilty when doing wrong): may be better liars because they do not feel guilty for lying, thus showing less emotion when lying • Willingness to manipulate (skilled and willing to manipulate): may be better liars because they practice it regularly • Helps explain why people we know are such good liars • More participants in May 2007