1 / 28

JERICO

The JERICO project aims to establish a long-term and sustained network of coastal observatories in Europe. This kick-off meeting in Paris will discuss organization, management, coordination, communication, and technical and financial reports.

nswanson
Download Presentation

JERICO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. JERICO Kick-off meeting Maison de la Recherche PARIS 24 & 25 May 2011

  2. JERICO A Joint European Research Infrastructure network for Coastal Observatories

  3. Towards a long-term and sustained European • network of coastal observatories EC umbrella (directives, policies, communications) Marine Core Services (DG ENT / GMES) Coastal modelling Oceanic modelling Coastal and shelf seas continuous in situ measurements MY OCEAN National/regional activities/projects Rivers discharges EURO ARGO (ESFRI) Fisheries data Social/commercial activities EMSO (ESFRI) MY OCEAN EUROFLEETS (I3) Marine data thematic centers SEADATANET (I3) standards and web portal WISE-Marine (DG ENV) EMODNET (DG MARE)

  4. How the project is structured ?

  5. NIVA IMR SYKE SMHI DMI MI NERC CEFAS BL P A R T N E R S DELTARES NIOZ IBWPAN MUMM HZG INSU IFREMER OGS INGV CNR CMCC IH AZTI CSIC PdE IO-BAS UOM HCMR

  6. KICK-OFF MEETING • INFORMATION ON ORGANIZATION • MANAGEMENT, COORDINATION • COMMUNICATION, JERICO website • TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL REPORTS • FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT • WP ACTIVITIES (coordination, tasks, workshops, deliverables, milestones, ...) • VOTES & CONCLUSION

  7. CONTRACTS • Grant Agreement in progress • Ifremer and EC signatures done • All Form A are signed • Final GPF available • JERICO_(262584)_2011-03-16[1]_final GPF • JERICO_(262584)_2011-02-22[1]_Annex I • Consortium Agreement in progress • Final CA sent to partners this week, last questions before 5th June and signatures before the 20th June

  8. MANAGEMENT TEAM • Patrick FARCY, coordinator, WP11 • Ingrid Puillat as deputy coordinator • Dominique GUEGUEN, finance and administration • Nadine Rossignol, assistance to the coordinator

  9. COORDINATION TEAMS • Scientific coordination within WP1 • Pascal Morin, CNRS • Dominique Durand, NIVA • Ingrid Puillat, Ifremer • STEERING COMMITTEE • WPLs TEAM

  10. STEERING COMMITTEE • W. PETERSEN – HZG • S. KAITALA – SYKE • D. HYDES – NERC (TBC by vote #1) • D. MILLS – CEFAS • D. DURAND – NIVA • G. NOLAN - MI • A. GREMARE – CNRS • S. SPARNOCCHIA – CNR • K. NITTIS – HCMR • J. TINTORE – CSIC • P. FARCY – IFREMER

  11. STEERING COMMITTEE • Invited advisers (without right of vote) • EEA : Tim Haigh • Marine Board : Aurelien Carbonnière • Vote #2 • MEETING EVERY 9 MONTHS • Coordinated with a workshop if possible • Before General Assemblies • Email/phone meeting if necessary

  12. GENERAL ASSEMBLIES • KICK-OFF MEETING [Mi]: Paris, May 2011 • Partners and EC representatives • GA 2 [Mi]: Greece (HCMR), October 2012 • Partners, associated partners • Mid term review : Brussels, April 2013 • SC, WPL team, EC representatives • GA 3 [Mi]: Norway, April 2014 • Partners, associated partners • Final GA [Mi]: France, April 2015  All

  13. WPL TEAM • Pascal Morin – CNRS, WP1 • Henning Wehde – IMR, WP2 • Wilhelm Petersen – HZG, WP3 • Georges Petihakis – HCMR, WP4 • Alessandro Crise – OGS, WP5 • David Mills – CEFAS, WP6 • Patrick Farcy (acting) – Ifremer, WP7 • Stefania Sparnocchia – CNR, WP8 • Srdjan Dobricic – CMCC, WP9 • Glenn Nolan – MI, WP10

  14. WPL TEAM • One co-coordinator for each WP as deputy (Twin) • Meetings are organised by the team but not “contractual” • Internal activity reports M 9, 24, 27 (Vote #3) • Activity report 1, month 18 • Activity report 2, month 36 • Final Activity report, month 48

  15. WPL TEAM • Each WPL organise its own WP and has to have tasks leaders (with deputy if required), work plan, milestones, deliverable schedule. • Provide for internal management, financial and effort progresses every 9 months. • WP Leaders have to organise the coordination of their WP.

  16. ADVISORY COMMITTEES • SAC. The SAC will be aware of : • TNA call evaluation • JRA R & D strategy and results • Evaluation of the intermediats and final reports on the Strategy for the future • FCT • Technological forum organisation (2) • Interface between marine research infrastructure and industry • Propose to give label to sensor/equipment

  17. SAC (proposal – Vote #4) • 1) Dr. Janet Newton, biological oceanographer, P.I. at the  University of Washington and the Executive Director for the Northwest Association of Networked Ocean Observing Systems (NANOOS) • 2) Dr George Zodiatis, Physical Oceanographer, University of Cyprus. • 3) Dr. Richard Dewey, Physical Oceanographer, University of Victoria, Canada. • 4) Dr Hans Dalhin, Director of EUROGOOS • 5) Dr Roger Proctor, Program Leader, IMOS, University of Tasmania, Australia

  18. FCT board (Vote #5) • Glenn Nolan • Yannick Aoustin • Franciscus Colijn (Univ Kiel - Ferrybox) • Laurent Mortier (LOCEAN - glider) • Alicia Lavin (IEO – fixed platforms) • Secretary : French “pôle Mer”, association of SME’s in marine R & D

  19. TNA selection committee (Vote #6) • The WP8 leader, Stefania Sparnocchia. • The coordinator : P Farcy. • The WP1 coordination team : P Morin, D Durand, I Puillat. • The 5 SAC experts(Newton, Zodiatis, Dewey, Dalhin, Proctor) • The 3 FCT board experts (Colijn, Mortier, Lavin)

  20. TNA Selection Timescale • Validation of the call by the selection panel • CALL • Selection of the TNAs by the selection panel (scientific excellence). • Validation of the proposal by the manager of the infrastructure : feasibility, timescale, availability … suggestion of adjustement. • Final assessment by the selection panel.

  21. ASSOCIATED PARTNERS • IMOS, Australia • CIESM • TUBITAK, Turkey • SHOM, France • IZOR, Croatia • IEO, Spain • More TBD: EUROSITES/EMSO, … • EMODNET

  22. JERICO WEBSITE • www.jerico-fp7.eu • Jerico website managed by the WP6 • As simple as possible. • Link to the data service access • Beta version available for end of June • A temporary Google site : https://sites.google.com/site/jericofp7/home/kick-off

  23. COMMON DOC BASE • FTP or collaborative server : all documentations stored on a disk with protection and backup, • Official documents • Project management, mailing lists • Financial documents and templates • WP 1 to 10 files • Access by Jerico website or directly • Managed by Nadine

  24. Mailing lists • Jerico.partners = official partner • Jerico.adm = administrative contacts * • Jerico.Steeringcommittee = ST members • Jerico.STbackup = ST secretary * • Jerico.WPleaders = WP leaders • Jerico.WPcoleaders = WP co-coordinators * • WPx for the WPx mailing list * • jerico@ifremer.fr = management team • Jerico.SC = Science coordination

  25. WP 11 - Management • Task 1: day to day management • Task 2: financial follow-up (Tuesday am) • Task 3: Technical reporting, M18, 36, 48 • Task 4: Quality assurance plan (with HCMR) Identity set (with NIVA) • Task 5: Consortium animation • Task 6: Other management related issues • Exchanges with Australia and USA • Associated partners

  26. DELIVERABLES • Consortium agreement: M2 • Quality Assurance plan: M3 • Identity set: M6 • First periodic report: M18 • Second periodic report: M36 • Final periodic report: M48

  27. VOTES • #1: David Hydes, NERC representative in the Steering committee • #2: EEA and Marine board representatives are permanent invited members of the Steering Committee • #3: The GA approve to do internal activity reports (including financial aspects) in Months 9, 24 & 27 • #4: The GA approves the SAC constitution. • #5: The GA approves the FCT board constitution.

  28. VOTES • #6: The GA approves the Selection panel for TNA call constitution. • #7: The GA approves the proposal of the Coordinator to delay the payment of the advances for WP7 activities till the partners have defined the data provided (month 10). • #8: The GA approves the proposal of the Coordinator to delay the payment of the advances for WP8 activities till the partners will be selected by the selection committee (month 12)

More Related