210 likes | 339 Views
Conjunct COST B27 and SAN Scientific Meeting, Swansea, UK, 16-18 September 2006. Oscillatory phase synchronisation: A brain mechanism of memory matching and attention. Paul Sauseng 1,2 , Wolfgang Klimesch 1 , Walter R. Gruber 1 , Niels Birbaumer 2. 1. 2. Top Down. Matching.
E N D
Conjunct COST B27 and SAN Scientific Meeting, Swansea, UK, 16-18 September 2006 Oscillatory phase synchronisation: A brain mechanism of memory matching and attention Paul Sauseng1,2, Wolfgang Klimesch1, Walter R. Gruber1, Niels Birbaumer2 1 2
Top Down Matching Bottom Up • Introduction • Methods • - Exp. Pardigm • Data Processing • Results • Gamma Sources • cfPSI • PLI • Phase Coh. • Conclusions
Busch et al. (2004) MUM Herrmann et al. (2004a) Herrmann et al. (2004a) Herrmann et al. (2004b) How is matching between top-down and bottom-up information implemented in the human brain? • Introduction • Methods • - Exp. Pardigm • Data Processing • Results • Gamma Sources • cfPSI • PLI • Phase Coh. • Conclusions
Theta oscillations (around 5 Hz), fronto-parietal network and top-down activation • Introduction • Methods • - Exp. Pardigm • Data Processing • Results • Gamma Sources • cfPSI • PLI • Phase Coh. • Conclusions Sauseng et al. (2005) Sarnthein et al. (1998) von Stein & Sarnthein (2000): Integrative brain processes like top-down activation are reflected by long-range theta and/or alpha activity Sauseng et al. (2006)
Interaction between GAMMA and THETA ? MUM local distributed Herrmann et al. (2004a) • Introduction • Methods • - Exp. Pardigm • Data Processing • Results • Gamma Sources • cfPSI • PLI • Phase Coh. • Conclusions
invalid trial valid trial Experimental Paradigm + • Introduction • Methods • - Exp. Pardigm • Data Processing • Results • Gamma Sources • cfPSI • PLI • Phase Coh. • Conclusions 2500 ms + 34 ms + 600-800 ms 50 ms Time [ms]
Time-frequency analysis Beamformer source analysis of 35-45 Hz activity Local sources (dipole clusters) into maxima of gamma sources Raw EEG at scalp level transformed into ongoing source activity using the dipolar model derived from gamma activity EEG data acquisition and analysis 22 healthy subjects 32-channel EEG at 250 Hz • Introduction • Methods • - Exp. Pardigm • Data Processing • Results • Gamma Sources • cfPSI • PLI • Phase Coh. • Conclusions
Claims and measures Memory matching is reflected by gamma:theta interaction and amplified by attention => cross-frequency phase synchronisation index (cfPSI) consistency of phase differences between different frequencies over trials Is gamma:theta phase synchronisation phase locked to stimulus onset? And does evoked gamma activity reflect memory matching (MUM)? => phase locking index (PLI) consistency of phase angle of one frequency in respect to stimulus onset over trials Is top-down activation reflected by a fronto-parietal theta network? => phase coherence consistency of phase differences between electrode sites over trials at one frequency • Introduction • Methods • - Exp. Pardigm • Data Processing • Results • Gamma Sources • cfPSI • PLI • Phase Coh. • Conclusions
Local Gamma sources (BESA) • Introduction • Methods • - Exp. Pardigm • Data Processing • Results • Gamma Sources • cfPSI • PLI • Phase Coh. • Conclusions
+ + + + + + Cross-frequency Phase Synchronisation Index (40 Hz : n Hz) D cfPSI (target right – target left) • Introduction • Methods • - Exp. Pardigm • Data Processing • Results • Gamma Sources • cfPSI • PLI • Phase Coh. • Conclusions
Cross-frequency Phase Synchronisation Index (40 Hz : 4-8 Hz) • Introduction • Methods • - Exp. Pardigm • Data Processing • Results • Gamma Sources • cfPSI • PLI • Phase Coh. • Conclusions 4-way interaction F4,84 = 3.35, p<.05 no sign. effects in other frequency bands
Valid condition Invalid condition Phase Locking Index • Introduction • Methods • - Exp. Pardigm • Data Processing • Results • Gamma Sources • cfPSI • PLI • Phase Coh. • Conclusions
+ + + Phase Coherence (on the scalp level) Theta • Introduction • Methods • - Exp. Pardigm • Data Processing • Results • Gamma Sources • cfPSI • PLI • Phase Coh. • Conclusions Gamma
MUM gamma : theta phase synchronization 100 – 200 ms evoked gamma during first 100 ms poststimulus ATTENTION evoked theta between 100 and 300 ms Herrmann et al. (2004a) Conclusion: a cascade of brain oscillatory mechanisms of memory matching • Introduction • Methods • - Exp. Pardigm • Data Processing • Results • Gamma Sources • cfPSI • PLI • Phase Coh. • Conclusions Fronto-parietal theta network pre- and poststimulus
This research was supported by the Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftDFG (Project BI 195/51-1)
Cross-frequency Phase Synchronisation Index (cfPSI) µV t 2 pi 0 pi t µV t 2 pi 0 pi t
pi -pi Cross-frequency Phase Synchronisation Index(cfPSI) 2 pi 0 pi t
pi pi pi pi -pi -pi -pi -pi pi -pi Cross-frequency Phase Synchronisation Index(cfPSI)
Cross-frequency Phase Synchronisation Index(cfPSI) difference
Phase Locking Index(PLI) t stimulus onset
Phase Coherence Phase locking value (PLV) Lachaux et al. (1999) Consitency of phase difference between 2 electrodes / sensors over trials cfPSI, PLI, Phase Coherence: 0 = no phase synchronisation / locking 1 = absolute phase synchronisation / locking